Argue With Everyone Political Forums  

Go Back   Argue With Everyone Political Forums > Specific Political Issues > Gay Issues

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #111 (permalink)  
Old 05-03-2008, 10:22 PM
Razzputin's Avatar
Machiavelli Incarnate
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 2,995
Default There is nothing wrong with the systemized destruction of the faggots...it is good!

Quote:
Originally Posted by bodecea View Post
Marriage is a right as declared in Loving v. Virginia.
And if you look to the decision, there is no specifying man/woman only.


Unlike those straight couples who marry a zillion times, or marry for green cards, or marry to get at their step-kids, or marry for money, or marry for status, or marry for sex only.


I knew you were going to work your anal sex fantasy into this post somewhere.



Now THAT's a funny one!



And make them wear purple triangles and put them into camps and then put them into ovens. You're a fine Nazi, Gay-Rejected Repressed Razzie.



Sieg Heil! Sieg Heil! Sieg Heil!

History of gay men in Nazi Germany and the Holocaust - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

There is nothing wrong with the systemized destruction of the faggots...it is good! We destroy rats and cockroaches for much less, and no one is advocating their murder. They need to be deported, and those who have committed sex acts against children should surely be executed. It is important to remember that FAG is a CONDITION and not a race. Fags dont qualify to be a race. THEY DO QUALIFY TO BE CRIMINALIZED.

There is no reason to let fags marry, other than to identify them for the purpose of holding them responsible for their crimes against humanity / children.

Fags have no business marrying really...they are not family units....they are fag units....perverts.....seeking tax breaks that they dont deserve. Their destruction by disease is insignificant. Their deportation would benefit society. Executing the paedophiles that they support and protect will stop future acts of fag violence against the children of this country. It is right and good that we protect nature and humanity by removing this bacteria from American society.

Last edited by Razzputin; 05-03-2008 at 10:26 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #112 (permalink)  
Old 05-03-2008, 11:36 PM
bodecea's Avatar
Political Mastermind
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: California
Posts: 2,189
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Razzputin View Post
There is nothing wrong with the systemized destruction of the faggots...it is good! We destroy rats and cockroaches for much less, and no one is advocating their murder. They need to be deported, and those who have committed sex acts against children should surely be executed. It is important to remember that FAG is a CONDITION and not a race. Fags dont qualify to be a race. THEY DO QUALIFY TO BE CRIMINALIZED.

There is no reason to let fags marry, other than to identify them for the purpose of holding them responsible for their crimes against humanity / children.

Fags have no business marrying really...they are not family units....they are fag units....perverts.....seeking tax breaks that they dont deserve. Their destruction by disease is insignificant. Their deportation would benefit society. Executing the paedophiles that they support and protect will stop future acts of fag violence against the children of this country. It is right and good that we protect nature and humanity by removing this bacteria from American society.
It is simply amazing how repressed you are. Just like Ernst Rohm.
__________________
"I consider Homo anal sex to be a religion." - Wow, AWE poster.
Reply With Quote
  #113 (permalink)  
Old 05-04-2008, 01:50 PM
wolf_22's Avatar
Political Mastermind
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 2,364
Smile

Quote:
Originally Posted by bodecea View Post
Not in THIS country you don't. Maybe in China, or Russia, or Saudi Arabia.
THANK YOU!
__________________
Psych Majors are JUNG and HORNEY

Freedom is SEXY


Reply With Quote
  #114 (permalink)  
Old 05-04-2008, 04:02 PM
Machiavelli Incarnate
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 4,653
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Razzputin View Post
There is nothing wrong with the systemized destruction of the faggots...it is good! We destroy rats and cockroaches for much less, and no one is advocating their murder. They need to be deported, and those who have committed sex acts against children should surely be executed. It is important to remember that FAG is a CONDITION and not a race. Fags dont qualify to be a race. THEY DO QUALIFY TO BE CRIMINALIZED.

There is no reason to let fags marry, other than to identify them for the purpose of holding them responsible for their crimes against humanity / children.

Fags have no business marrying really...they are not family units....they are fag units....perverts.....seeking tax breaks that they dont deserve. Their destruction by disease is insignificant. Their deportation would benefit society. Executing the paedophiles that they support and protect will stop future acts of fag violence against the children of this country. It is right and good that we protect nature and humanity by removing this bacteria from American society.
Are you really that dumb or are you just having fun?
__________________
I respect your right to have your own opinion,but I do not necessarily respect your opinion.
Reply With Quote
  #115 (permalink)  
Old 05-04-2008, 06:07 PM
Political Junkie
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 117
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by bodecea View Post
Not in THIS country you don't. Maybe in China, or Russia, or Saudi Arabia.
Really? Then why is homosexual marriage only legal in one state? Why doesn't the federal government say that it is unconstitutional to deprive them?
...
Reply With Quote
  #116 (permalink)  
Old 05-04-2008, 06:09 PM
Political Junkie
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 117
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by wolf_22 View Post
I think there are two kinds of marriage- state and relgious.

state marriages tends to deal with equality, economy, and stabalizing people

realigious tends to deal with god, morals, love, and the emotional reasons why most people are motivated to marry.

what do say to gay buddihists? they are allowed to marry in their temples but the state doesn't recognize their marriages.
other sects of religion also allow gay unions.
couldn't this be a 1st amendment violation?
Define marriage as you believe it should be under law.
Reply With Quote
  #117 (permalink)  
Old 05-04-2008, 06:11 PM
Political Junkie
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 252
Default

Why does Sotmfs,assume that gays are pedaphiles.How friggin ignorant.
I can tell you how someone is raised has nothing to do with a persons
sexual predeliction.
I have been married for 27 years and have 3 adult children.My youngest
son is gay (21) and is a very popular well adjusted college student who
is involved in the local community.I am closer to this son than the other
and have long discussions with him.The son who is most like me have
a tougher time together.
I wished many times for him not to be gay,but I accept it because his
being happy is more important.But I will not ever believe in gay marraige.
I think civil unions will protect gay couples interest as well,but to call it marraige is wrong.There will always be a certain uneasiness with this in my heart, but an open mind and love gets me through it.
Reply With Quote
  #118 (permalink)  
Old 05-04-2008, 06:21 PM
Machiavelli Incarnate
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 4,653
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by RAIDER56 View Post
Why does Sotmfs,assume that gays are pedaphiles.How friggin ignorant.
I can tell you how someone is raised has nothing to do with a persons
sexual predeliction.
I have been married for 27 years and have 3 adult children.My youngest
son is gay (21) and is a very popular well adjusted college student who
is involved in the local community.I am closer to this son than the other
and have long discussions with him.The son who is most like me have
a tougher time together.
I wished many times for him not to be gay,but I accept it because his
being happy is more important.But I will not ever believe in gay marraige.
I think civil unions will protect gay couples interest as well,but to call it marraige is wrong.There will always be a certain uneasiness with this in my heart, but an open mind and love gets me through it.
Hold on were do I say gays are pedaphiles?Have you read any posts of mine?
I have a gay brother and gay friends,And I am not homophobic or stupid.
Well I have done a lot of stupid shit,but being a racist,etc is not one those
__________________
I respect your right to have your own opinion,but I do not necessarily respect your opinion.
Reply With Quote
  #119 (permalink)  
Old 05-04-2008, 06:23 PM
Machiavelli Incarnate
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 4,653
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by FreedomForWho View Post
Really? Then why is homosexual marriage only legal in one state? Why doesn't the federal government say that it is unconstitutional to deprive them?
...
Because the federal government is,well did you ever watch C-span?
__________________
I respect your right to have your own opinion,but I do not necessarily respect your opinion.
Reply With Quote
  #120 (permalink)  
Old 05-04-2008, 06:26 PM
Machiavelli Incarnate
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 4,653
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Razzputin View Post
There is nothing wrong with the systemized destruction of the faggots...it is good! We destroy rats and cockroaches for much less, and no one is advocating their murder. They need to be deported, and those who have committed sex acts against children should surely be executed. It is important to remember that FAG is a CONDITION and not a race. Fags dont qualify to be a race. THEY DO QUALIFY TO BE CRIMINALIZED.

There is no reason to let fags marry, other than to identify them for the purpose of holding them responsible for their crimes against humanity / children.

Fags have no business marrying really...they are not family units....they are fag units....perverts.....seeking tax breaks that they dont deserve. Their destruction by disease is insignificant. Their deportation would benefit society. Executing the paedophiles that they support and protect will stop future acts of fag violence against the children of this country. It is right and good that we protect nature and humanity by removing this bacteria from American society.
Parents,at first sign child is gay should have the right and as a matter of fact should be required to closely observe their children and at first indication of homosexuality kill them.
__________________
I respect your right to have your own opinion,but I do not necessarily respect your opinion.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On
Forum Jump


» Navigation

Political Links Page

Blogs by AWE Members

Advertisers support this site - if you're interested in their product, take a look!


$5 monthly donation:

$10 monthly donation:



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:37 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.2.0
Poltical Topsites PolitiPoll.net - Political Web Rankings