Anyone remember JOHN WAYNE GACEY? He was also a fag.

Hey NAT....your flag your flying there....is that a dog caught in an asshole?

He was married.

__________________
"I consider Homo anal sex to be a religion." - Wow, AWE poster.

XD XD XD again want me to find some stories of heterosexuals molestign children. XD XD sad really sad, that you thought that could work

__________________
WHY CAN'T WE SEE THAT WHEN WE BLEED WE BLEED THE SAME." (MUSE)

The Bible contains six admonishments to homosexuals and 362 admonishments to heterosexuals. That doesn't mean that God doesn't love heterosexuals. It's just that they need more supervision." ~Lynn Lavner

well i guess that means you don't have a source and what your saying is just a bunch of crap and opinions, which no one wants to hear. Nice, you get beat and you come back by shooting insults.

by reading all these threads: ive come to the conclusion that all of the anti-gays are around the age of 8 or 10.

__________________
WHY CAN'T WE SEE THAT WHEN WE BLEED WE BLEED THE SAME." (MUSE)

The Bible contains six admonishments to homosexuals and 362 admonishments to heterosexuals. That doesn't mean that God doesn't love heterosexuals. It's just that they need more supervision." ~Lynn Lavner

A platform for pedophiles?
By Dr. Judith A. Reisman


Dr. Judith Reisman is president of the Institute for Media Education and is the author of "Kinsey, Crimes & Consequences." More is available at Reisman's website.

The day before Minnesota passed H.F. 585 in 1993, I was asked to assist parents' rights activists there who were trying to stop this "sexual orientation" bill introduced by a small clique of Democratic legislators.

Too late.

But not too late to kill the pedophile privileges which would take effect in the Democrats' "sexual orientation" bill. The Minnesota's statute spelled out special rights for "sexual or affectional orientation" and "age," jettisoning the God-given rights of parents for the state-given rights of pedophiles. While pedophiles are stealthily included under any new "sexual orientation" law (see the American Psychiatric Association listing of myriad sexual orientations) "affectional" is well known as a term for pedophiles (child molesters) within the sexuality field.

In The Journal of Paedophilia, Dr. John Money, of Johns Hopkins University, a pedophile advocate and pediatric professor emeritus, defined "affectional" for his upper-air child molester readers. Says John:

affectional paedophilia in layman's terms ... (is) the straight forward affectional attraction to children ... a paedophilic attraction to children ... an overflowing of parental pairbonding into erotic pair bonding. ... (T)he affectional relationship, in male paedophilia at least, is ...erotic or lover-lover pairbonding ... a combination of affectionate love as well as the lust factor. ...

To their credit, once so informed about the true definition, Minnesota legislators immediately excised all "affectional" references in the legislation.
Unfortunately, as we slosh about in our post-Kinsey revolutionary sexual sewer, all professions and political parties host their share of closeted sexual psychopaths. Hastings Wyman reports that "The Democratic Party has embraced gay and lesbian America as a major constituency in its coalition of key voter groups. The Republican Party has mostly abandoned its past homophobia and has exhibited -- albeit cautiously -- a friendly face to gay people" (Capital Letters, Oct. 19, 2000).

With our children's futures depending on the character of these gay-friendly officials and political operatives, parents need to be on the look out for which party platform is perhaps pedophile ("affectional") friendly -- the Democratic, Republican or Reform parties?

A Reform Party campaign staffer confirmed to this writer that their platform seeks no "rights" on the basis of age or orientation, etc. No loopholes there for sexual subversives to barrel through. The Republican Platform opposes "discrimination based on sex, race, age, religion, creed, disability or national origin." No sexual orientation privileges -- yet.

But, closet pedophiles never go away. And they are baaack, listed as "Civil, Human, and Constitutional Rights" in the Minnesota Democratic Party platform. This Minnesota platform opposes discrimination "against anyone on the basis of race, creed, and here they go again: "sexual or affectional orientation" or "age."

Their website reads, "Democrats Leading Us Into The Future! Moving Toward Democratic Victories!" But just who will enjoy the "victories" toward which this Democratic party would move us? The national Democratic Party platform says victory would include ending "discrimination on the basis of race, gender, religion, age, ethnicity, disability, and sexual orientation" while helping out "gay and lesbian families."

We'll come back to "gay and lesbian families" later but the "age" and "sexual orientation" designations should warn vigilant citizens that "affectional" pedophile advocates, seeking to legitimize the group once known as child molesters, are well placed in the big welcoming Democratic Tent. Bill Clinton's recent federal "sexual orientation" legislation protects all "orientations" which would include "affectional" pedophiles, pederasts, sadists, zoophiles, coprophiles, necrophiles, and the like.

And, yes, child molesters do have a perfidious influence in the highest offices in our land. The covert political power of such sexual subversives often determines who is hired and fired, who gets scientific funding, whose story is reported or spiked, what laws are passed or locked in committee and whether police, prosecutors or judges find ways to aid predators or their victims.

So, especially when "age" is tied to "sexual orientation" as a protected class, parents beware! The camel's pedophile nose is well under the political party tent. Observe the "progressive" Netherlands.

The 1993 Journal of Paedophilia reported, "The Netherlands Changes Its Age of Consent Law," lowering it to age 12. Dutch pedophile Jan Schuijer explained how his group worked legislatively to end the age of consent. Schuijer writes,

We were lobbying ... (with) the gay rights movement (and) ... Mrs. Wille Swildens-Rozendaal of the Labor Party ... behind the scenes. ... (A) weak spot is ... child protection agencies are entitled to make complaints. ... The Dutch public ... angrily objected to the (age-of-consent) bill that was announced in 1985. ... Although radical legislative reform cannot be expected at the moment, a certain normalization, step by step, as regards the thinking on paedophilia ... is achieved by the new law.

Similarly "lobbying behind the scenes" in the USA, a secret cadre of pedophile political operatives and legislators are working "step by step" to legally wrest children from their parents for personal pleasure and often to profit the thriving child sex industry.
In 1993, Democrat Mark Kramer, homosexual member of the Oregon Legislative Assembly, introduced a bill that would have allowed the state to take children from competent parents to award them to non-familial adults. The Oregon legislation did not require that parents be unfit, and would give children to anyone

who has maintained an ongoing personal relationship with substantial continuity for at least one year, through interaction, companionship, interplay and mutuality. ... (Anyone) who has established emotional ties creating a child-parent relationship with a child may petition or file a motion for intervention with the court having jurisdiction over the custody, placement, guardianship or wardship of that child. ..."
Those "gay and lesbian families" slated for state "support" in the Democratic Party platform are created in various ways. Legislators (like Oregon's Kramer and Minnesota 's Clark, Bishop, Reding, Oathoff, Skoglund and many other state legislators as well) would give custody to persons who gave "interaction, companionship, interplay and mutuality" to the children -- whatever that means. Thus a judge could award children to pedophiles who create "gay and lesbian families" for a brief or extended period.
Does this wake up a few American parents out there? The Minnesota Democratic Party supports the aggressive actions by Clinton, national Democratic Party leaders and the Justice Department to try to force the Boy Scouts to sanction homosexual scout leaders. These actions should send a clear signal to parents of little boys.

As in the Netherlands, closeted sexually deviant bureaucrats, judges, legislators and other civic officials can only attain their "rights" by merging these within a legitimate American political party. And the political party that sanctions "sexual orientation" inevitably sanctions bi/homosexuals, transvestites, zoophiles, necrophiles and all other sexual pathologies too diverse to mention here, including the most treacherous of them all, pedophiles and pederasts.

So, when you cast your ballots Nov. 7, consider the pedophiles working within the tolerant Democratic Party to legalize "affectional and sexual orientation" and consider the "right" of any "age" child to jettison their biological parents to form a "gay and lesbian family" with adults who had displayed "companionship, interplay and mutuality" -- for a year.

Impossible? Just remember, you read it here first.

-30-

Posted by a thoughtful commentator on another website. This is a cut-n-past for your enjoyment.

THE DEMORATS HAVE WAY MORE PEDOPHILES AND SEX SCANDALS THAN THE REPUBLICANS. THE ONLY DIFFERENCE IT SEEMS IS THAT REPUBLICANS THROW OUT THEIR PERVERTS...DEMORATS MERELY RE-ELECT THEIRS.

(DEMOCRAT) REP. JOHN YOUNG (D-Tex.):
On June 11, 1976, Colleen Gardner, a former staff secretary to Young, told the New York Times that Young increased her salary after she gave in to his sexual advances. In November, Young, who had run unopposed in the safe Democratic district five consecutive times, was reelected with just 61 percent of the vote. The scandal wouldn't go away, and in 1978 Young was defeated in a Democratic primary runoff.

(DEMOCRAT) REP. ALLAN HOWE (D-Utah):
On June 13, 1976, Howe was arrested in Salt Lake City on charges of soliciting two policewomen posing as prostitutes. Howe insisted he was set up and refused to resign. But the Democratic Party distanced itself from his candidacy and he was trounced by his Republican opponent in the November election.

(DEMOCRAT) REP. FRED RICHMOND (D-N.Y.):
In April 1978, Richmond was arrested in Washington for soliciting sex from a 16-year-old boy. Richmond apologized for his actions, conceding he "made bad judgments involving my private life." In spite of a Democratic primary opponent's attempts to cash in on the headlines, Richmond easily won renomination and reelection. But his career came to an end four years later when, after pleading guilty to possession of marijuana and tax evasion - and amid allegations that he had his staff procure cocaine for him -- he resigned his seat.

(DEMOCRAT) REP. JOHN HINSON (D-Miss.):
On Aug. 8, 1980, during his first reelection bid, Hinson stunned everyone by announcing that in 1976 he had been accused of committing an obscene act at a gay haunt in Virginia. Hinson, married and a strong conservative, added that in 1977 he had survived a fire in a gay D.C. movie theater. He was making the disclosure, he said, because he needed to clear his conscience. But he denied he was a homosexual and refused GOP demands that he resign. Hinson won reelection in a three-way race, with 39 percent of the vote. But three months later, he was arrested on charges of attempted oral sodomy in the restroom of a House office building. He resigned his seat on April 13, 1981.

(DEMOCRAT) REP. ROBERT BAUMAN (D-Md.):
On Oct. 3, 1980, Bauman, a leading "pro-family" conservative, pleaded innocent to a charge that he committed oral sodomy on a teenage boy in Washington. Married and the father of four, Bauman conceded that he had been an alcoholic but had been seeking treatment. The news came as a shock to voters of the rural, conservative district, and he lost to a Democrat in November.

(DEMOCRAT) REP. DAN CRANE (R-Ill.)
and (DEMOCRAT) REP. GERRY STUDDS (D-Mass.):
The House ethics committee on July 14, 1983, announced that Crane and Studds had sexual relationships with teenage congressional pages -- Crane with a 17-year-old female in 1980, Studds with a 17-year-old male in 1973. Both admitted the charges that same day, and Studds acknowledged he was gay. The committee voted to reprimand the two, but a back-bench Georgia Republican named Newt Gingrich argued that they should be expelled. The full House voted on July 20 instead to censure the two, the first time that ever happened for sexual misconduct. Crane, married and the father of six, was tearful in his apology to the House, while Studds refused to apologize. Crane's conservative district voted him out in 1984, while the voters in Studds's more liberal district were more forgiving. Studds won reelection in 1984 with 56 percent of the vote, and continued to win until he retired in 1996.

(DEMOCRAT) REP. ERNIE KONNYU (D-Calif.):
In August 1987, two former Konnyu aides complained to the San Jose Mercury News that the freshman Republican had sexually harassed them. GOP leaders were unhappy with Konnyu's temperament to begin with, so it took little effort to find candidates who would take him on in the primary. Stanford professor Tom Campbell ousted Konnyu the following June.

(DEMOCRAT) SEN. BROCK ADAMS (D-Wash.):
On Sept. 27, 1988, Seattle newspapers reported that Kari Tupper, the daughter of Adams's longtime friends, filed a complaint against the Washington Democrat in July of 1987, charging sexual assault. She claimed she went to Adams's house in March 1987 to get him to end a pattern of harassment, but that he drugged her and assaulted her. Adams denied any sexual assault, saying they only talked about her employment opportunities. Adams continued raising campaign funds and declared for a second term in February of 1992. But two weeks later the Seattle Times reported that eight other women were accusing Adams of sexual molestation over the past 20 years, describing a history of drugging and subsequent rape. Later that day, while still proclaiming his innocence, Adams ended his campaign.

(DEMOCRAT) REP. JIM BATES (D-Calif.):
Roll Call quoted former Bates aides in October 1988 saying that the San Diego Democrat made sexual advances toward female staffers. Bates called it a GOP-inspired smear campaign, but also apologized for anything he did that might have seemed inappropriate. The story came too close to Election Day to damage Bates, who won easily. However, the following October the ethics committee sent Bates a "letter of reproval" directing him to make a formal apology to the women who filed the complaint. Although the district was not thought to be hospitable to the GOP, Randy "Duke" Cunningham, a former Navy pilot who was once shot down over North Vietnam, ousted Bates in 1990 by fewer than 2,000 votes.

(DEMOCRAT) REP. GUS SAVAGE (D-Ill.):
The Washington Post reported on July 19, 1989, that Savage had fondled a Peace Corps volunteer while on an official visit to Zaire. Savage called the story a lie and blamed it on his political enemies and a racist media. (Savage is black.) In January 1990, the House ethics committee decided that the events did occur, but decided against any disciplinary action because Savage wrote a letter to the woman saying he "never intended to offend" her. Savage was reelected in 1990, but finally ousted in the 1992 primary by Mel Reynolds.

(DEMOCRAT) REP. BARNEY FRANK (D-Mass.):
In response to a story in the Aug. 25, 1989, Washington Times, Frank confirmed that he hired Steve Gobie, a male prostitute, in 1985 to live with and work for him in his D.C. apartment. But Frank, who is gay, said he fired Gobie in 1987 when he learned he was using the apartment to run a prostitution service. The Boston Globe, among others, called on Frank to resign, but he refused. On July 19, 1990, the ethics committee recommended Frank be reprimanded because he "reflected discredit upon the House" by using his congressional office to fix 33 of Gobie's parking tickets. Attempts to expel or censure Frank failed; instead the House voted 408-18 to reprimand him. The fury in Washington was not shared in Frank's district, where he won reelection in 1990 with 66 percent of the vote, and has won by larger margins ever since.

(DEMOCRAT) SEN. DANIEL INOUYE (D-Hawaii):
In October 1992, Republican Senate nominee Rick Reed began running a campaign commercial that included a surreptitiously taped interview with Lenore Kwock, Inouye's hairdresser. Kwock said Inouye had sexually forced himself on her in 1975 and continued a pattern of sexual harassment, even as Kwock continued to cut his hair over the years. Inouye, seeking a sixth term, denied the charges. And Kwock said that by running the commercial, Reed had caused her more pain than Inouye had. Reed was forced to pull the ad, and while many voters took out their anger on the Republican, Inouye was held to 57 percent of the vote - the lowest total of his career. A week later, a female Democratic state legislator announced that she had heard from nine other women who claimed Inouye had sexually harassed them over the past decade. But the women didn't go public with their claims, the local press didn't pursue the story, and the Senate Ethics Committee decided to drop the investigation because the accusers wouldn't participate in an inquiry.

(DEMOCRAT) REP MEL REYNOLDS (D-Ill.):
Freshman Reynolds was indicted on Aug. 19, 1994, on charges of having sex with a 16-year-old campaign worker and then pressuring her to lie about it. Reynolds, who is black, denied the charges and said the investigation was racially motivated. The GOP belatedly put up a write-in candidate for November, but Reynolds dispatched him in the overwhelmingly Democratic district with little effort. Reynolds was convicted on Aug. 22, 1995 of 12 counts of sexual assault, obstruction of justice and solicitation of child pornography, was sentenced to five years in prison, and resigned his seat on October 1.

again what does this have to do with gay issues?? it does not matter what political party is better, homosexuals can be republican, both parties are equally flawed. Get over it

__________________
WHY CAN'T WE SEE THAT WHEN WE BLEED WE BLEED THE SAME." (MUSE)

The Bible contains six admonishments to homosexuals and 362 admonishments to heterosexuals. That doesn't mean that God doesn't love heterosexuals. It's just that they need more supervision." ~Lynn Lavner

Gay married.

__________________

GOD BLESS AMERICA

wow you of all people should know thats not allowed in most states. XD XD i love that comback though, gay married XD XD XD

__________________
WHY CAN'T WE SEE THAT WHEN WE BLEED WE BLEED THE SAME." (MUSE)

The Bible contains six admonishments to homosexuals and 362 admonishments to heterosexuals. That doesn't mean that God doesn't love heterosexuals. It's just that they need more supervision." ~Lynn Lavner