I am trying to be patient or even understand this thread at all...
If provided a factual time-line where is the need for statistics?
Unless one is going to microanalyze particular profiles and characteristics.
Kix said it right in the begining, anyone exposed to facts will find statistics useless.
Reading a time-line gives someone a quick reference to historical facts and events over a period of time.
"Learing the truth" requires some effort in research, reading and comprehensive thought.
I should stop here because I am often accused of being callous to various liberal posters here.
mmm..nah, no I'm not...
Even though they "swear" they are not biased , however, armed with facts they typically lean towards a progressive-leftist initiative..
Here's a fact, the internet is loaded with accredited, reliable non biased information.
Isn't it curious how they ask facetious questions concerning politically propagandistic and controversial matters and behave as if they maintain a neutral position while they claim to know that nothing is real.
This thread must be an example of cliches like "ignorance is bliss" and suggestions like, 'who knows'? or "nothing is as it seems"??
Sooo, when I steer attention to or make a call on such suggestive and facetious stances I am made out to be a malcontent..
heh, fuck you.
__________________
"The world is a fine place and worth fighting for" Ernest Hemingway
"The world will know that free men stood against a tyrant, that few stood against many" Spartan King Leonidas
|