Thread: Is it a must that we should make a climate deal?

If negotiators reach an accord at the climate talks in Copenhagen it will entail profound shifts in energy production, dislocations in how and where people live, sweeping changes in agriculture and forestry and the creation of complex new markets in global warming pollution credits.

1. what is all this going to cost? Answer:The short answer is trillions of dollars over the next few decades.

2. Whatever global warming’s effects — and most scientific projections are less dire — there are also varying estimates of the economic costs of failing to act to address the problem soon, some of them very high.

source:NY Times, Global Times Forum

The cause of dealing with global warming is huge, especially for developing and countries. Now, do you think it is necessary that we should make a deal on this?

The only option that the warmers have is to eliminate population. That's why the new healthcare plan. Death panels will reduce our carbon footprint.

There is NO catastrophic Global Warming. We would be paying huge sums of money for nothing.

We should take the trillions of dollars and spend it on one last big party with lots of naked women and booze, before the earth swallows us up.

Never make a deal with mountbanks. They do not negotiate in good faith, and their word is worthless.

Originally Posted by percysunshine

We should take the trillions of dollars and spend it on one last big party with lots of naked women and booze, before the earth swallows us up.

Best idea yet!

Originally Posted by percysunshine

We should take the trillions of dollars and spend it on one last big party with lots of naked women and booze, before the earth swallows us up.

I'm voting for you for President.