So it must be your belif that all your pet "scientists" are working pro bono for the good of mankind.

Take your heros out at NASA for instance. Who funds NASA? Answer-a bunch of Democrat Congress people. What is the Democrat stance on AGW? NASA goes against the Democrat belief=less money for NASA. Hence NASA not a valid source.

oh yeah NASA the HQ of the global conspiracy, they're linked with area 51 you know, probably alien mind control behind all that...eww very scary...

Why is this sooooooo hard for you to follow? NASA is funded by congress. Congress is controlled by Democrats. AGW is among their main agendas. No AGW, no funding for NASA. Get it? Same as the energy companies.

Not to mention that these normally lonely geek scientists finally are getting some attention from the press. And that attention equates to millions of research dollars that will keep them secure for the rest of their carreers. They likely don't give a shit what the outcome of the research will be. But you need to scare the public in order to get the funding.

__________________
Wikkipedia was made by and is used by wankers. It is wanker central, wanker city, wankotopia. They should call it Wankopedia....

ooooo I get it like the sniper on the grassy knoll and faked lunar landing yeaaah right I understand now....were you part of the covered up alien abduction? did have your anus probed too????....I guess it's true, the truth is out there....

...and of course the link between lung cancer and smoking is all a conspiracy theory.

WE MUST ONLY LISTEN TO SO CALLED EXPERTS WORKING OR BEING PAID BY THE TOBACCO INDUSTRY WHEN DETERMINING THE EFFECTS OF SMOKING TOBACCO ON A PERSON'S HEALTH.

JUST LIKE WE MUST ONLY LISTEN TO SO CALLED EXPERTS FROM THE FOSSIL FUEL INDUSTRY WHEN DETRMINING THE EFFETCS OF HUMAN ACTIVITY ON GLOBAL WARMING AND CLIMATE CHANGE.

Very sound logic from the AGW deniers who are under siege and dont have the intergrity nor the moral quality to admit that they are liars, dumb, greedy or all of the above.

Give up mental freaks - its getting very embarrassing reading your counter arguments to AGW - if we can call them counter arguments - more like spin lies and deception

__________________
Who brought down the USA and why?

"and of course the link between lung cancer and smoking is all a conspiracy theory"


No, but the hype about second hand smoke is.

__________________
Wikkipedia was made by and is used by wankers. It is wanker central, wanker city, wankotopia. They should call it Wankopedia....

So you do not have the capacity to understand how your scientists can be effected by the left's politics. Of course you can't, you don't have the capacity to be skeptical of unproven scientific claims. You accept the AGW dogma without question. You have proven faith that your scientists are above their own monetary gain and the PC politics of AGW. Oh, and right, NASA is completely above politics. Keep your faith strong, maybe the AGWers will make you a deacon or bishop in the religion.