 |
|

04-02-2007, 11:57 AM
|
|
Machiavelli Incarnate
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 10,963
|
|
Who're we kidding, Reps?
We don't have a veto-proof timeline for withdrawal quite yet, but we will have one about a month before the primaries begin. That should provide enough time for Republicans seeking re-election to come up with plausible denials for having recently voted to continue their excellent adventures in Iraq.
|

04-02-2007, 12:00 PM
|
 |
Machiavelli Incarnate
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: mountains of East TN
Posts: 9,146
|
|
Why is the left so dedicated to failure in Iraq? Just a simple question. They seem more concerned with surrender than victory
|

04-02-2007, 12:16 PM
|
|
Machiavelli Incarnate
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 10,963
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by nathanbforrest45
Why is the left so dedicated to failure in Iraq? Just a simple question. They seem more concerned with surrender than victory
|
>>>Let's just say the right has been given 5 years to succeed and they've failed abysmally. We're just not interested in seeing failure continue.
|

04-02-2007, 12:59 PM
|
 |
Machiavelli Incarnate
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: SW Oklahoma
Posts: 14,265
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by George O Well
>>>Let's just say the right has been given 5 years to succeed and they've failed abysmally. We're just not interested in seeing failure continue.
|
George, you might be right, but what has the Libs suggested besides withdrawl?
__________________
An informed voter scares the Goverment lackeys.
An American first and always a Conservative.
|

04-02-2007, 01:00 PM
|
 |
Machiavelli Incarnate
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: mountains of East TN
Posts: 9,146
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by George O Well
>>>Let's just say the right has been given 5 years to succeed and they've failed abysmally. We're just not interested in seeing failure continue.
|
Oh Please George, the left would not accept anything short of our total pullout leaving the Iraqi people to fend for themselves as a victory. Your side is totally committed to surrender period. Always have been, always will be.
|

04-02-2007, 03:03 PM
|
 |
Machiavelli Incarnate
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 6,355
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by nathanbforrest45
Oh Please George, the left would not accept anything short of our total pullout leaving the Iraqi people to fend for themselves as a victory. Your side is totally committed to surrender period. Always have been, always will be.
|
This is not surrender... the mission goals for this engagement where to rid Saddam of WMD's, which he didn't have... so MISSION ACCOMPLISH althought it was a MASSIVE failure that has cause the deaths of countless thousands of Iraqis and Americans...
So... when we found out that there were not WMD's BUSH WAS FUCKED and he knew it so the blunder was spinned into CREATING AN IRAQI DEMOCRACY LOL, which isn't possible without the USA holding guns to the heads of EVERYONE. They can't even protect the green zones anymore...
The second goal was to remove Saddam Hussein... he's dead.
Time to go... The was no mention to Congress that we were nation building when they approved action in Iraq.
This is a prime example of Presidential abuse of power.
__________________
Those who would give up Essential Liberty to purchase a little Temporary Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety.
— Benjamin Franklin
The government of the United States is not, in any sense, founded on the Christian religion.
John Adams from the " Treaty of Tripoly, article 11
|

04-02-2007, 03:10 PM
|
 |
Machiavelli Incarnate
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: SW Oklahoma
Posts: 14,265
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by I_Hate_the_Nazi_Right
This is not surrender... the mission goals for this engagement where to rid Saddam of WMD's, which he didn't have... so MISSION ACCOMPLISH althought it was a MASSIVE failure that has cause the deaths of countless thousands of Iraqis and Americans...
So... when we found out that there were not WMD's BUSH WAS FUCKED and he knew it so the blunder was spinned into CREATING AN IRAQI DEMOCRACY LOL, which isn't possible without the USA holding guns to the heads of EVERYONE. They can't even protect the green zones anymore...
The second goal was to remove Saddam Hussein... he's dead.
Time to go... The was no mention to Congress that we were nation building when they approved action in Iraq.
This is a prime example of Presidential abuse of power.
|
Well I guess that there must be at least 2 or 3 ways to say retreat. I bet if they had a Mardi Gras there you would say stay and rebuild.
__________________
An informed voter scares the Goverment lackeys.
An American first and always a Conservative.
|

04-02-2007, 03:32 PM
|
 |
Machiavelli Incarnate
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: mountains of East TN
Posts: 9,146
|
|
IMHO, the Iraq war is but a minor campaign on the larger mission of ridding the world of muslim extremist. I am willing to believe anything an administration tells me is the reason for going to war against one of these countries that support terrorist because I know the real reason is to eliminate those murdering bastards. Maybe you don't care what they do to this country but IHNR, I do and I sincerely believe finally we have a president who sees this problem for what it really is.
IHNR, please learn a few words besides 4 letter ones it really would make you seem like you know a little bit more than you actually do. To constantly answer every post with the f word makes you seem about as stupid as jimmythedude appers but we all know he is just pretending to be stupid
|

04-02-2007, 04:47 PM
|
|
Machiavelli Incarnate
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 10,963
|
|
"Your side is totally committed to surrender period. Always have been, always will be."
>>>Nah, "surrender" implies that there is someone in Iraq capable of accepting our surrender.
|

04-02-2007, 05:28 PM
|
 |
Machiavelli Incarnate
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 6,355
|
|
You're right... I do swear some but it more to do with my anger and passion of this subject. This isn't a discussion about tax law... people are dying and at this point in many cases it's the WRONG people dying.
About Iraq... there was no evidence that Hussein had any thing to do with the terrorists who we were seeking in the war on terror. In fact there is evidence to the contrary.
Did you hear ONE democrat including myself denounce the war in Afghanistan? No! why? Because that is where the terrorist were and when switched focus to Iraq we actually LOST ground in the war on terror.
If he wanted to go after the terrorists he would have invaded Saudi Arabia, but since he is an honorary prince of that country, he wasn't going to rock that boat...
Bush's war on terror is joke and I can't understand why you reps actually back him up.
__________________
Those who would give up Essential Liberty to purchase a little Temporary Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety.
— Benjamin Franklin
The government of the United States is not, in any sense, founded on the Christian religion.
John Adams from the " Treaty of Tripoly, article 11
|
| Thread Tools |
|
|
| Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
|