Obama's Charisma

RASTAMAN · #31 (**permalink**) 02-25-2007, 03:16 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Izdaari

Or someone more into practical reality and solving problems than ideology and partisan warfare. Someone who loves his country more than his faction.

Obama talks that way, but he doesn't vote that way. Too bad.

Moderates can't expect to win all the time....now can they!

fenianforever1689 · #32 (**permalink**) 02-25-2007, 03:27 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RASTAMAN

And you are an average Knuckle Dragging Dumb Ass Conservative who only believes and support CONSERVATIVE SOURCES..........So what's new!

No. Unlike you I post sources.

I generally only use sfgate.com and wikipedia which are both liberal sources.

rob · #33 (**permalink**) 02-25-2007, 03:34 PM

If the majority of Americans are moderates, then why shouldn't their views win all elections? A demoracy is all about the needs of the many without depriieving the minorities.

fenianforever1689 · #34 (**permalink**) 02-25-2007, 03:44 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by rob

If the majority of Americans are moderates, then why shouldn't their views win all elections?

The majority of Americans are probably not moderate on at least one issue is why.

Quote:

A demoracy is all about the needs of the many without depriieving the minorities.

Thank God that we are a representative republic then and not a mobocracy.

RASTAMAN · #35 (**permalink**) 02-25-2007, 03:49 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by fenianforever1689

The majority of Americans are probably not moderate on at least one issue is why.

Thank God that we are a representative republic then and not a mobocracy.

The point is, moderate can't expect to win with their political beliefs all the the time fore there is room for none moderates to win as well. The non-moderates have been able to embrace moderate stances, question is, can moderates except non-moderate political stances and still be good sports and ensure their party wins in 08. Nothng last forever nor should they.

fenianforever1689 · #36 (**permalink**) 02-25-2007, 04:04 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RASTAMAN

The point is,

at the top of your empty head.

crowonapost · #37 (**permalink**) 02-25-2007, 04:28 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by fenianforever1689

No. Unlike you I post sources.

I generally only use sfgate.com and wikipedia which are both liberal sources.

How is Wikipedia a 'liberal' source?

fenianforever1689 · #38 (**permalink**) 02-25-2007, 04:53 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by crowonapost

How is Wikipedia a 'liberal' source?

It is mostly edited by people who have a liberal bent is how.

That has been shown time and time again.

Also liberals also liberally quote it and use it and liberals are notorious for going to biased news sources.

Anyway, what difference does it make to you if I think that wikipedia is a biased liberal source.

Do you think otherwise or something equally nonsensical?

RASTAMAN · #39 (**permalink**) 02-25-2007, 05:16 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by fenianforever1689

No. Unlike you I post sources.

I generally only use sfgate.com and wikipedia which are both liberal sources.

Well GOOD ON YOU!! You want a Medal?

RASTAMAN · #40 (**permalink**) 02-25-2007, 05:18 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by fenianforever1689

It is mostly edited by people who have a liberal bent is how.

That has been shown time and time again.

Also liberals also liberally quote it and use it and liberals are notorious for going to biased news sources.

Anyway, what difference does it make to you if I think that wikipedia is a biased liberal source.

Do you think otherwise or something equally nonsensical?

You haven't proven anything. All you have done was stated your narrow minded conservative opinon.