Joe Biden Vs. Sarah Palin--The Debate--Who Won??

Kappy · #11 (**permalink**) 10-02-2008, 11:47 PM

DRUDGE REPORT 2008®

DRUDGE REPORT 2008®

{{{{DRUDGE POLL}}}} WHO WON THE VICE PRESIDENTIAL DEBATE?...

BIDEN 26% 36,921
PALIN 73% 105,075
NEITHER 2% 2,667

Total Votes: 144,663

areyoushittin'me? · #12 (**permalink**) 10-03-2008, 12:52 AM

Quote:

The CBS poll of undecideds had Biden winning the debate 46-21, with 33 percent calling it a tie. But few votes were moved as as result. Among the undecideds, 18 percent committed to Obama, and 10 percent committed to McCain, but 71 percent remained uncommitted.

Biden won the CNN and CBS focus groups. Palin won the Luntz focus group. The candidates tied in the Halperin focus group.

...................

Get Real · #13 (**permalink**) 10-03-2008, 01:02 AM

[quote=Badmutha;621632]What are you getting at GR??....if your referring to Obama's abandoned brother George....you can relive the pain if you want....

Barack's brother--George Obama --Lives in a hut...Poops in a bucket...the remnants of liberal talking points lay within

Oh Delusional One I see where you are coming from, George Obama's own words mean nothing just the ones the LOONS make up to take swipes at Obama.

Well my honest unbiased opinion......it was a dud.....Biden looks like the 30 year old dinosaur of change....Palin looked like the rookie Washington outsider....

....but if the liberal media uses the same scoring system as the McCain/Obama debate....then Palin..being the underdog.....clearly won if she held her own.

"liberal media, liberal media, liberal media"
Why since the media is so damn liberal did I have to suffer through 2 terms of G.W. Bush? You should have had that battle cry going on in 2000 ya' surely would have saved me lots of pain. Wasn't enough Tylenol made for that headache.

alvagoldbook · #14 (**permalink**) 10-03-2008, 06:10 AM

I could only handle about 5 minutes of the debate. One more "Gee golly willikers" from Moose-olini and I was gonna throw the TV out the window.

percysunshine · #15 (**permalink**) 10-03-2008, 06:43 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by alvagoldbook

I could only handle about 5 minutes of the debate. One more "Gee golly willikers" from Moose-olini and I was gonna throw the TV out the window.

It is a good thing that you did not do that. Your only source of knowledge in the entire universe would have disappeared in a heartbeat,

nonsqtr · #16 (**permalink**) 10-03-2008, 07:37 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by percysunshine

It is a good thing that you did not do that. Your only source of knowledge in the entire universe would have disappeared in a heartbeat,

You're on a roll today, Percy...

I just gotta comment.... um... I've gotten a really valuable education here on this forum, in just the last two weeks. Some of these nutty conspiracy types (Petey, and KokomoJoJo and Lucidthots and people like that) have just given me something VERY valuable, in terms of a concrete "tool" that I can use.

You know, and I mean, "I", and not a conspiracy nut, I'm more the practical man, the "tinkerer", the "scientist", that's me. And, I have an education and a long and varied career, so, conspiracy theories are usually met with great skepticism.

However, the flip side of that coin, is that "contempt prior to investigation" is NEVER a good thing. So, I try to keep an open mind, and LISTEN, 'cause, people post stuff for different reasons - some people, are just parrotting talking points, but, there are also some people with intelligent and unique perspectives that they'd like to communicate, and, that is more why "I" use forums like this.

And all that, is only to say, that if your only source of news is the TV, then, I think it is very fair to say, that you probably fall into the category of what the politicians would call "sheeple" -

And in that case, I have a thought:

percysunshine · #17 (**permalink**) 10-03-2008, 07:42 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by nonsqtr

You're on a roll today, Percy...

I just gotta comment.... um... I've gotten a really valuable education here on this forum, in just the last two weeks. Some of these nutty conspiracy types (Petey, and KokomoJoJo and Lucidthots and people like that) have just given me something VERY valuable, in terms of a concrete "tool" that I can use.

You know, and I mean, "I", and not a conspiracy nut, I'm more the practical man, the "tinkerer", the "scientist", that's me. And, I have an education and a long and varied career, so, conspiracy theories are usually met with great skepticism.

However, the flip side of that coin, is that "contempt prior to investigation" is NEVER a good thing. So, I try to keep an open mind, and LISTEN, 'cause, people post stuff for different reasons - some people, are just parrotting talking points, but, there are also some people with intelligent and unique perspectives that they'd like to communicate, and, that is more why "I" use forums like this.

And all that, is only to say, that if your only source of news is the TV, then, I think it is very fair to say, that you probably fall into the category of what the politicians would call "sheeple" -

And in that case, I have a thought:

Technically, that was two thoughts...chuckle

Badmutha · #18 (**permalink**) 10-03-2008, 09:25 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Get Real

Oh Delusional One I see where you are coming from, George Obama's own words mean nothing just the ones the LOONS make up to take swipes at Obama.

His own words??...that he is just fine on his $1.00/month budget and his shack is rather nice?? That he doesnt mind his millionaire brother Barack abandoning his brothers and sisters?

Quote:

"liberal media, liberal media, liberal media"
Why since the media is so damn liberal did I have to suffer through 2 terms of G.W. Bush? You should have had that battle cry going on in 2000 ya' surely would have saved me lots of pain. Wasn't enough Tylenol made for that headache.

Because in a sane world....democrats wouldnt get one vote....

Add the 95% liberal media....some brainwashing...and some bribes.....and they get about 40%

Realist1 · #19 (**permalink**) 10-03-2008, 09:36 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Badmutha

What are you getting at GR??....if your referring to Obama's abandoned brother George....you can relive the pain if you want....

Barack's brother--George Obama --Lives in a hut...Poops in a bucket...the remnants of liberal talking points lay within

Well my honest unbiased opinion......it was a dud.....Biden looks like the 30 year old dinosaur of change....Palin looked like the rookie Washington outsider....

....but if the liberal media uses the same scoring system as the McCain/Obama debate....then Palin..being the underdog.....clearly won if she held her own.

Where liberals go to die........Badmutha vs. Any Lib Out There

I just checked the Drudge Report, and he has a Poll going right now.

330,000 voted so far, and 230,000 say Sara won....

I think it's safe to say that's the National Consenus too.

Take care.

areyoushittin'me? · #20 (**permalink**) 10-03-2008, 09:50 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Realist1

I just checked the Drudge Report, and he has a Poll going right now.

330,000 voted so far, and 230,000 say Sara won....

I think it's safe to say that's the National Consenus too.

Take care.

In other words the gap is closing from the immediate reaction at Drudge?

Quote:

As with the Obama-McCain debate last Friday, the vast majority of the insta-polls went to the Democratic ticket. Biden won the CBS poll of undecideds 46-21, and the CNN poll of debate watchers 51-36. Independents in the large MediaCurves focus group panel went for Biden about 2:1.

The internals, however, weren't nearly as bad for Palin as the topline results. She got a jump in preparedness in the CBS poll, and the CNN found that a large majority of voters concluded that she had beaten their expectations.