Quote:
Originally Posted by TakuanSoho
The ex brother in law tasered his 10 year old child, then said he did so because his child asked for it (even the State Troopers office confirmed that). Is this the type of person you would want as a state trooper?
Now perhaps one shouldn't let personal information get in the way, but if you are tying your fortunes to that guy, boy you all are desperate.
|
Nothing needs to be tied to "that guy". Everything hangs on what the Governors motives were and why due process was not followed. If the kid got tasered, then charges chould have been brought against him. Child Welfare should have been involved.
But you do NOT fire the Boss of this guy and fuck up his family situation because he wouldn't fire his officer that is allegedly fucking up your family situation.
It's enough for me that their is the appearance of very questionable decisions here. I'm just waiting for more info, instead of trying to make shallow justifications pro or con. Yes, more info... which means answer questions. She's national now with a liberally biased MSM... if she screwed up, put herself above those she has gone after as a reformer... sorry, we just had eight years of that... next.
If there is nothing to all of this, and can show proper decisions were made... then game on... let's go to the vote.