Argue With Everyone Political Forums  

Go Back   Argue With Everyone Political Forums > General Political Debate > Elections

test
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 06-04-2008, 06:32 AM
RASTAMAN's Avatar
Machiavelli Incarnate
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 10,205
Default McCain Can't Read! And Republicans are a Train Wreck

MCCAIN DIDN'T READ THE INTELLIGENCE REPORT BEFORE THE INVASION (NOR DID CLINTON); A TINY MINORITY OF PEOPLE WHO TOOK TIME TO READ IT. REMEMBER 4100 AMERICAN TROOPS DIED FOR NOTHING! BECUASE OF MCCAIN AND BUSH’s WAR!

Bush, McCain, GOP and CLINTON voted to send 4100 troops to there death and for what? That is the real story here!

1. Is Iran stronger or weaker since Bush/McCain’s invasions of Iraq?

2. Has Osama bin Laden been killed or captured since Bush/McCain’s invasion of Iraq?

3. Are we paying more for gas now or before Bush/McCain’s invasion of Iraq?

4. Is our economy better of now or before Bush/McCain’s invasion of Iraq?

5. Is the White Houses creditability better now or before Bush/McCain’s invasion of Iraq?

6. Is the budget deficit higher now or before Bush/McCain’s invasion of Iraq?

7. Is the Middle East more peaceful now or before Bush/McCain’s invasion of Iraq?

8. Do we have more American Solders dead or before Bush/McCain’s invasion of IRAQ?

THE CASE FOR TREASON UNDER THE RULE OF LAW!

Commiting fraud in order to go to war. Treason by revealing Valerie Plame's identity in order to throw people off their trail. Obstruction of justice. Torture. Manslaughter. Propagandizing. Election fraud. Profiteering.
__________________
AMERICA LAND OF THE FREE HOME OF THE BRAVE--BECAUSE OF OUR CONSTITUTION.
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 06-04-2008, 07:16 AM
wow's Avatar
wow wow is offline
Machiavelli Incarnate
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: The Republic of Texas
Posts: 5,774
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by RASTAMAN View Post
MCCAIN DIDN'T READ THE INTELLIGENCE REPORT BEFORE THE INVASION (NOR DID CLINTON); A TINY MINORITY OF PEOPLE WHO TOOK TIME TO READ IT. REMEMBER 4100 AMERICAN TROOPS DIED FOR NOTHING! BECUASE OF MCCAIN AND BUSH’s WAR!

Bush, McCain, GOP and CLINTON voted to send 4100 troops to there death and for what? That is the real story here!

1. Is Iran stronger or weaker since Bush/McCain’s invasions of Iraq?

2. Has Osama bin Laden been killed or captured since Bush/McCain’s invasion of Iraq?

3. Are we paying more for gas now or before Bush/McCain’s invasion of Iraq?

4. Is our economy better of now or before Bush/McCain’s invasion of Iraq?

5. Is the White Houses creditability better now or before Bush/McCain’s invasion of Iraq?

6. Is the budget deficit higher now or before Bush/McCain’s invasion of Iraq?

7. Is the Middle East more peaceful now or before Bush/McCain’s invasion of Iraq?

8. Do we have more American Solders dead or before Bush/McCain’s invasion of IRAQ?

THE CASE FOR TREASON UNDER THE RULE OF LAW!

Commiting fraud in order to go to war. Treason by revealing Valerie Plame's identity in order to throw people off their trail. Obstruction of justice. Torture. Manslaughter. Propagandizing. Election fraud. Profiteering.
You still can not accept the fact you lost the election in 2000 and were defeated by Americans in Iraq.
__________________
The United States of Indentured Servants
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 06-04-2008, 09:28 AM
SuperDelegate#12's Avatar
Political Mastermind
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Liberty City
Posts: 1,987
Default

And your momma threw out the baby and kept the after birth, so what? Obama is still the weakest candide ever nominated.
__________________
http://www.catholicleague.org/release.php?id=1457

http://insidecatholic.com/Joomla/ind...3953&Itemid=48

OBAMA SUPPORTS KILLING LIVE BABIES!! NOT JUST UNBORN BABIES BUT LIVE BABIES!!


"We can't drive our SUVs and eat as much as we want and keep our homes on 72 degrees at all times ... and then just expect that other countries are going to say OK," Obama said.
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 06-04-2008, 08:32 PM
RASTAMAN's Avatar
Machiavelli Incarnate
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 10,205
Default

McCain represents out dated conservative Rethuglicans.....which makes McBush the weakest candidate.

The contrast is already obviously clear! Obama is 46 and looks 40; McCain is 71 and looks closer to 85, and heavily medicated with memory pills to delay his obvious onset of dementia and senility as well as Alzheimer.

Although he's got more energy than someone half his age, you can't hold back father time. The stamina edge goes to Obama b/c after all, he can still play full court basketball, while McCain needs help just to relieve himself of his bodidly fluids. Their match up will represent the largest age gap between major-party presidential candidates in American history.

The campaign will pit change vs. experience, fresh vs. outdated, youth vs. gray. Once the niceties about one's heroism and the other's inspiration ends, Obama will make the Arizona senator look like a hypocritical, clueless and warlike geezer, who is hopelessly ready to continue a Bush 3rd term and try to sell the public on a 50-100 occupation of Iraq!

Obama will expose the pipe dream ill-fated and unsustainable fallacies of McShame's 50-100 occupation, with historical evidence for proof that no western-european country has ever successfully occupied a Middle Eastern country in the last 2000 years! Let me repeat......ALL WESTERN-EUROPEAN ATTEMPTED OCCUPATION OF MIDDLE EASTERN COUNTRIES HAVE FAILED!!

History will repeat itself if lessons of the past go unheeded and ignored. It appears conservative GOP ideology and political imperialist global designs have arogantly ignored this simple fact of history.
__________________
AMERICA LAND OF THE FREE HOME OF THE BRAVE--BECAUSE OF OUR CONSTITUTION.
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old 06-04-2008, 09:09 PM
Machiavelli Incarnate
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Washington state
Posts: 3,393
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by RASTAMAN View Post
McCain represents out dated conservative Rethuglicans.....which makes McBush the weakest candidate.

The contrast is already obviously clear! Obama is 46 and looks 40; McCain is 71 and looks closer to 85, and heavily medicated with memory pills to delay his obvious onset of dementia and senility as well as Alzheimer.

Although he's got more energy than someone half his age, you can't hold back father time. The stamina edge goes to Obama b/c after all, he can still play full court basketball, while McCain needs help just to relieve himself of his bodidly fluids. Their match up will represent the largest age gap between major-party presidential candidates in American history.

The campaign will pit change vs. experience, fresh vs. outdated, youth vs. gray. Once the niceties about one's heroism and the other's inspiration ends, Obama will make the Arizona senator look like a hypocritical, clueless and warlike geezer, who is hopelessly ready to continue a Bush 3rd term and try to sell the public on a 50-100 occupation of Iraq!

Obama will expose the pipe dream ill-fated and unsustainable fallacies of McShame's 50-100 occupation, with historical evidence for proof that no western-european country has ever successfully occupied a Middle Eastern country in the last 2000 years! Let me repeat......ALL WESTERN-EUROPEAN ATTEMPTED OCCUPATION OF MIDDLE EASTERN COUNTRIES HAVE FAILED!!

History will repeat itself if lessons of the past go unheeded and ignored. It appears conservative GOP ideology and political imperialist global designs have arogantly ignored this simple fact of history.
Speaking of trainwrecks.. I started a thread on it, but just in case you've missed it, check this out:

Talking Points Memo | TPMtv: McCain Leaves Fox Speechless
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old 06-05-2008, 12:06 AM
Political Guru
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 696
Default

And Obama represents 20th Century Communism. Which did not work.
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old 06-05-2008, 03:54 AM
PIZ's Avatar
PIZ PIZ is offline
Seasoned Veteran
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Chicago
Posts: 33
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by SuperDelegate#12 View Post
And your momma threw out the baby and kept the after birth, so what? Obama is still the weakest candide ever nominated.
Obama the weakest?lol

I swear to God man, you have to be one of the most nieve people I have ever come accross, you say the stupidest things! Everyone of your post could have came from an 8 year old!

Give it a Month, Obama's gonna be well ahead of McCain once the party heals and the Dems fully unit. If anything I feel Obama's one of the strongest, well defined canidates in the last 40 years, and by the time Nov rolls around McCain will not have a chance in hell!

GROW UP, MORON!
Reply With Quote
  #8 (permalink)  
Old 06-05-2008, 07:37 AM
Political Junkie
 
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 383
Default

Obamma is the friend of the terrorist, and the nemesis of the American.
Reply With Quote
  #9 (permalink)  
Old 06-05-2008, 05:17 PM
RASTAMAN's Avatar
Machiavelli Incarnate
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 10,205
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by wow View Post
You still can not accept the fact you lost the election in 2000 and were defeated by Americans in Iraq.
What's funny here is that conservatives actually believed Bush won the 2000 and 2004 election fairly despite the evidence he needed his brothers help (Gov of Fla) to illegally and falsely blacklist over 20,000 legal predominately black voters in Fla. in 2000. And of course, the Ohio vote was stolen by Republicans in 2004, by ensuring their was a shortage of voting machines in predominately democratic precincts which resulted in voters standing in line for 8 and 10 hours before they could vote! Yet in Repub. voting precincts the longest wait to vote was 20 minutes. Guess who was responsible for ensuring enough voting machines were allocated fairly thru out the state of Ohio??? Thats right! The responsibility rested with the 2004 Ohio Republican legislature! How about the unexplained anomalies of voting machines mysteriously giving Bush votes.

Nearly half of the 6 million American voters living abroad never received their ballots -- or received them too late to vote -- after the Pentagon unaccountably shut down a state-of-the-art Web site used to file overseas registrations.

A consulting firm called Sproul & Associates, which was hired by the Republican National Committee to register voters in six battleground states, was discovered shredding Democratic registrations.

In New Mexico, which was decided by 5,988 votes, malfunctioning machines mysteriously failed to properly register a presidential vote on more than 20,000 ballots.

Nationwide, according to the federal commission charged with implementing election reforms, as many as 1 million ballots were spoiled by faulty voting equipment -- roughly one for every 100 cast.

Theres far more evidence out there proving voter fraud and voter disenfranchisement in the 2004 elections which overwhelmingly favored Bush! But hey, just four years later, how do you Repub. explain Bush's low approval ratings at this juncture during a time of War! The Answer is, voters did not vote for Bush in 2004.

So keep believing the lie that Bush won 2000 and the 2004 elections w/o cheating.
__________________
AMERICA LAND OF THE FREE HOME OF THE BRAVE--BECAUSE OF OUR CONSTITUTION.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On
Forum Jump


» Navigation

Political Links Page

Blogs by AWE Members

Advertisers support this site - if you're interested in their product, take a look!


test

$5 monthly donation:

$10 monthly donation:



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:31 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.2.0
Poltical Topsites PolitiPoll.net - Political Web Rankings