Quote:
Originally Posted by kgpoolerev
Upton, prove that Hagee was a friend of McCain's. Show that they were buddies or that McCain went to Hagee's church for 20 years.
You are sore that Wright turned to be such an albatross to the man who is too stupid to realized after 20 years that Wright was a racist and a hate monger. You are sore that Obama called Wright his uncle, his moral compass, and was even on Obama's staff for a short while.
|
Dude this Upton can't "prove" anything he says. He's a hack. This thread and any like it are an attempt to divert attention away from the rev Wright issue or to draw a moral equivelent. Saying, "See McCain's crazy preacher is just as bad, or worse." This is all in the liberal playbook. They
change the subject, they
scapegoat, they question the motives of the opponent. They use
hearsay and unqualified expert opinion he gives or cites an apparently expert opinion which is not from a qualified expert they will engage in
sloganeering, stereotyping and vaugeness, seeming to cite facts or logic, but his terms are so vague that no facts or logic are present.
Upton and Rasta commonly use the False premise, where he makes a statement that assumes some other fact has already been proven when it has not; in court, such a statement will be objected to by opposing counsel on the grounds that it “assumes facts not in evidence”
Accusation of taking a quote out of context one of the liberals favorite tactic is to accuses opponent of taking a quote that makes the Liberal look bad out of context. All quotes are taken out of context—for two reasons: quoting the entire context would take too long and federal copyright law. I say put "God Damn America" in to context.
Another of the liberals favorite tactics is play on the widely held fantasies of certain groups. Such as the Rev Wrights claim that the CIA sells drugs in the cities, and the Govenment gave aids to blacks on purpose.
Of course then there's Rasta an Crows favoriate personal insults.
Linear Mode
