Mrs Clinton will run as a 3rd party!!

SuperDelegate#12 · #11 (**permalink**) 05-10-2008, 09:43 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by wow

Why should Hillary quit when she is in the lead?
Excluding Michigan and Florida is nothing more than stealing the nomination from Hillary.
Clinton supporters should not tolerate this direct violation of the US Constitution.
Hillary should sue the Democrat party.

You hit the nail right on the head there Wow. Florida and Michigan are going to be a huge issue. Even bigger than they are today. If the demos are going to exclude them, Clinton will not accept the party's decision and will go to the courts and eventially to 3rd party candidacy. She will run saying that the democrats have sold out to the radical left, and have used an "unfair" delegate selction process to "FIX" or "rig" the contest.

I talked about this last week. Mrs Clinton won Texas by 4% but Obama got more delegates than she did, how the hell is that? It's like this. If Obama wins a democrat congressional district he gets more delegates than another congressional district that Clinton won. Now remember each of these congressional districts has the same number of people in them. There for it disproportionally gives Obama delegates. I believe that this is unconstitutional, in additon to the issues of FL and MI.

SuperDelegate#12 · #12 (**permalink**) 05-10-2008, 09:50 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Upton

Here is the pledge signed by all the candidates, including Clinton.

Quote:

Quote:
THEREFORE, I _______________, Democratic Candidate for President, in honor and in accordance with DNC rules, pledge to actively campaign in the pre-approved early states Iowa, Nevada, New Hampshire and South Carolina. I pledge I shall not campaign or participate in any election contest occurring in any state not already authorized by the DNC to take place in the DNC approved pre-window (any date prior to February 5, 2008). Campaigning shall include but is not limited to purchasing media or campaign advocacy of any kind, attending or hosting events of more than 200 people to promote one’s candidacy for a preference primary and employing staff in the state in question.

That contract would be seen as unenforcable by the Supreme Court. The democrat party has engaged in a unfair electioneering process by limiting the states who can hold early primaries. Why should voters of Iowa, Nevada, New Hampshire and South Carolina be given the right to vote before the voters of Michigan and Florida? Why should the voters MI and FL be punished for their states decission to move up the primary?

I'm telling you people something if the party doesn't do something to count these votes Hillary Clinton is going to court to get this settled. Remember she is a lawyer.

crowonapost · #13 (**permalink**) 05-10-2008, 10:08 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SuperDelegate#12

That contract would be seen as unenforcable by the Supreme Court. The democrat party has engaged in a unfair electioneering process by limiting the states who can hold early primaries. Why should voters of Iowa, Nevada, New Hampshire and South Carolina be given the right to vote before the voters of Michigan and Florida? Why should the voters MI and FL be punished for their states decission to move up the primary?

I'm telling you people something if the party doesn't do something to count these votes Hillary Clinton is going to court to get this settled. Remember she is a lawyer.

The supreme court isn't gong to do shit. Yes it was completely legal & technically not even Iowa is supposed to vote early.

No they broke the rules that simple. Like all your other deluded fantasies this ain't going to change.

LCOF · #14 (**permalink**) 05-10-2008, 10:21 AM

It's got to drive the Clintons' nuts watching Obama get the treatment from the media that was always theirs. And as frustrated as they are, I don't see them breaking from the Party.

I do see her getting revenge within the Party, and Obama.

RASTAMAN · #15 (**permalink**) 05-10-2008, 10:54 AM

Revenge! For What, just b/c they lost fair n square? Obama just ran a better campaign than did Hillary, and perhaps Hillary should have ran in 2004!!!!

LCOF · #16 (**permalink**) 05-10-2008, 11:12 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RASTAMAN

Revenge! For What, just b/c they lost fair n square? Obama just ran a better campaign than did Hillary, and perhaps Hillary should have ran in 2004!!!!

You've got to be kidding. Are you pretending that revenge, get even, is not apart of the Clinton thinking? Try "tax the rich" everything about getting even exists in this dogma they proclaim.

They will not take this lying down. Trust me.

pjwky · #17 (**permalink**) 05-10-2008, 11:35 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by wow

Why should Hillary quit when she is in the lead?
Excluding Michigan and Florida is nothing more than stealing the nomination from Hillary.
Clinton supporters should not tolerate this direct violation of the US Constitution.
Hillary should sue the Democrat party.

************************************************** *******
"wow", just about the only really unfair thing for the DNC to do now would be to INCLUDE Michigan & Florida after they specifically ALL agreed to leave them out if they changed their primary dates.

Its time for the "Dishonest Duo" --Bill / Hill, to go home and enjoy the hundreds of millions they have made at the expense of the American people. ...pjwky

wow · #18 (**permalink**) 05-10-2008, 11:36 AM

These Obama supporters are no different than the Gore supporters in 2000.
They will deny the rights of voters, change the rules to get the desired results.
The US Surpeme Court needs to step in and stop this gross violation of the voter's rights.
Americans want change!!

wow · #19 (**permalink**) 05-10-2008, 11:40 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by pjwky

************************************************** *******
"wow", just about the only really unfair thing for the DNC to do now would be to INCLUDE Michigan & Florida after they specifically ALL agreed to leave them out if they changed their primary dates.

Its time for the "Dishonest Duo" --Bill / Hill, to go home and enjoy the hundreds of millions they have made at the expense of the American people. ...pjwky

Clearly, Hillary's intent was to have MI and FL included. She campaigned and had her name on the ballot in both states.