 |
|

05-13-2008, 02:47 PM
|
|
Machiavelli Incarnate
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Washington state
Posts: 3,683
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by wow
Hillary's body language in the debates tells me she has been beaten down because she is a female. She acts inferior to Obama.
|
Oh yeah, I should have mentioned the Democrats are all misogynists too. So lets go over it, Obama is leading in states won, pledged delegates, and popular vote all because the Democrats are racists and misogynists that are rigging the election.
Do I have that right now? Or do either one of you have anything else stupid to say?
|

05-13-2008, 02:49 PM
|
 |
Machiavelli Incarnate
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 4,377
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Upton
Yep, I guess that's why Obama has won 31 contests to Clinton's 17, 17 primaries to Clinton's 14, 14 caucuses to Clinton's 3.
I guess it's also why Obama has received 16,003,524 votes 113,498 more than Clinton even if you include Mi and Fla.
Yep, it's all rigged by a bunch of racists.
|
The party decided that it was Obama's turn.
As for racism, 94% of Blacks support Obama. If 94% of whites supported Hillary, the cries of racism would drown out all other sound. But the hypocrisy of the left fails to hold consistent standards.
|

05-13-2008, 03:11 PM
|
 |
Machiavelli Incarnate
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: West Virginia ( Gods Country)
Posts: 6,590
|
|
Clinton will win West Virginia , no doubt about it.
West Virginians are good people but they are set in their ways. They might give a black family the shirt off their backs but they will not vote for a Black man for president. Its just a mind set.
If you look at the demographics of West Virginia we have a low black population and the third lowest population of illegals in the country because West Virginians don't trust anybody but other West Virginians.
Hillary will win the primary.
But once Obama is the nominee I predict small turn outs for West Virginia in the general election next November. Many people will just stay home rather than vote for McCain or a black man. I know that sounds bad but its true I know West Virginians and how most of them think.
McCain because of the lack of turn out by Democrats will win the general election in West Virginia next November.
You heard it here.
|

05-13-2008, 03:51 PM
|
 |
Machiavelli Incarnate
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: The Republic of Texas
Posts: 6,872
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Upton
Oh yeah, I should have mentioned the Democrats are all misogynists too. So lets go over it, Obama is leading in states won, pledged delegates, and popular vote all because the Democrats are racists and misogynists that are rigging the election.
Do I have that right now? Or do either one of you have anything else stupid to say?
|
You are arguing against the Democrat party rules, just like Obama supporters.
If Democrats do not like rules, then do not make rules.
Hillary is being ripped off and there should be violent riots at the convention.
__________________
Bush-lite fooled the American people
|

05-13-2008, 04:25 PM
|
|
Machiavelli Incarnate
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: chapmanville, wv
Posts: 4,829
|
|
The true facts of history is presented in the fact that WVA is in the heartland of America and "NO" democratic candidate has gone on to the win the General Election that has not carried the state of WVA. This has been true from the turn of the last century (1900). If history holds true, and there is no indicator that it will not, Mr. Obama's political coffin as had the first nail hammered home in the "MOUNTAIN STATE". BD
|

05-13-2008, 04:27 PM
|
|
Political Guru
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: West Kentucky
Posts: 927
|
|
SO WHAT ??????????.....pjwky
|

05-13-2008, 04:40 PM
|
|
Machiavelli Incarnate
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Washington state
Posts: 3,683
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by bluedog
The true facts of history is presented in the fact that WVA is in the heartland of America and "NO" democratic candidate has gone on to the win the General Election that has not carried the state of WVA. This has been true from the turn of the last century (1900). If history holds true, and there is no indicator that it will not, Mr. Obama's political coffin as had the first nail hammered home in the "MOUNTAIN STATE". BD
|
It's not "this has been true from the turn of the last century (1900)" Woodrow Wilson in 1916 won reelection but lost WV. Might seem like a small thing, but I thought you might like to get your facts straight.
Since 1936, a Redskins win in their last home game had been followed by a win for the presidential incumbent, and a loss meant a loss for the incumbent. The streak was finally broken in 2004, when the Redskins lost at home to Green Bay and the Republicans retained the White House.
My point? Streaks are made to be broken.
|

05-13-2008, 04:44 PM
|
|
Machiavelli Incarnate
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 4,588
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Upton
My point? Streaks are made to be broken.
|
Huh, I would have thought it was: "people who believe in such streaks are idiots" :-)
|

05-13-2008, 04:48 PM
|
|
Machiavelli Incarnate
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: chapmanville, wv
Posts: 4,829
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Upton
It's not "this has been true from the turn of the last century (1900)" Woodrow Wilson in 1916 won reelection but lost WV. Might seem like a small thing, but I thought you might like to get your facts straight.
Since 1936, a Redskins win in their last home game had been followed by a win for the presidential incumbent, and a loss meant a loss for the incumbent. The streak was finally broken in 2004, when the Redskins lost at home to Green Bay and the Republicans retained the White House.
My point? Streaks are made to be broken.
|
Semantics? Just how many straws are you going to grasp at? I very well knew the exact date, but its much easier to round it off. Will the exact terminology help when compared with a rounded figure? What's your point....I consider the teens the early turn of a century....apparently you do not? And now you compare football to politics? Is it not the democratic party that makes every more from statistical data? Good luck in electing any Black Marxist into the seat of power in any Republican form of government. It just will not happen, there are not enough blacks and gullible eggheads around...as demonstrated in WVa. BD
Last edited by bluedog; 05-13-2008 at 04:50 PM.
|

05-13-2008, 04:49 PM
|
|
Machiavelli Incarnate
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Washington state
Posts: 3,683
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by TakuanSoho
Huh, I would have thought it was: "people who believe in such streaks are idiots" :-)
|
I'll agree with that. Another interesting point about WV: winning there does not guarantee success, for it was won by Democratic candidates Adlai Stevenson in 1952, Carter in 1980 and Dukakis in 1988.
|
| Thread Tools |
|
|
| Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
|