Quote:
Originally Posted by nathanbforrest45
Tokie
Let me understand this. You are saying US schools do not do as well as European schools because we teach everyone at the same level - college bound. Isn't this a factor of our belief in "equality of outcome' vs "equality of opportunity"? European schools recognize not everyone is a math whiz and don't try to create little Einsteins out of every student. In fact in one paper I read regarding universal education in secondary schools the case was made the American system was the worst system because it left those with no aptitude for math or science
uneducated.
As far as the question someone posed did I know what I wanted to do at age 12, hell I am not sure I know what I want to do at age 63  . Seriously, at age 12 I was already an independent business man. I ran a paper route with about 100 customers, I sold papers in front of a grocery store (this was before paper boxes everywhere) I also organized several neighborhood kids into a lawn mowing service. I would sell the service and the others would actually cut the grass. Did I know I wanted to be in the transportation field? No, but I did know I wanted to work for myself. My son, who works in the computer science field, built a crystal radio when he was 8 years old. His 8th grade science project was a working robot. He knew from the age of 10 what he wanted to do with the rest of his life.
I think there are many highly motivated people who know what they want to do at a younger age then we give them credit for
|
Ours is indeed a very confused system.
I mean to say that today, because high school teachers view themselves (for their own personal psycho-emotional protection--and this has become built into the system) as a sort of junior college professor, they are unable to teach to kids who are not going on to college. Period.
Now, one would hope that at least means that they would be teaching the kids stuff that would lead them to college.
Nope. That's why you'll have 10th grade Lit classes in which the term "paper" is turning a scene from Romeo & Juliet into a Hip-Hope bit or making a "poster" about the play. These are 15-16 yr old young men an women. How many posters did you do for term papers in college?
Yes, the Euro approach has it's bennies...my concern is for well, people like me. Because I suck at math and because my folks were fairly uninvolved in my schooling, I was "tracked" at a very young age into the "dummy" track. This was essentially what special ed is, today.
Of course, that Permanent Record...ecord...cord...followed me (3rd grade on) and when I'd demonstrate in classes that I was really good at--English (writing), history, some of the sciences, art and music--HOW good I was at these things, the teachers had no idea in hell what to DO with me. I ended up, usually, sitting in a corner doing my "own thing" with virtually no guidance at all. When, at age 12 or 13, you are a better writer than your teacher, the system (absent LOTS of parental involvement...and my parents had been told I was near-retearded) is not set up to handle something like that, and individual teachers, typically, with 20-30 other kids to deal with in each class, have NO idea how to deal with it.
No....unlike all those Hallmark and Kodak commercials, I never encountered "that teacher" who "made a difference." Mine were all sub-literate buffoons who could barely scratch their own asses much less teach ME anything. I had a few who did make fairly lame attempts (and two who actully STOLE a piece of my art and a piece of my writing and put their own names on them...), but the entire package in my case was not particularly college-bound.
I went to college when I was 35--AFTER I was a published writer (science/tech journals, a few fiction pieces--of course telling you all this gives my detractors in here lots of childish mudclods..."a writer!? HA! Look at his spelling!!" but they are mindless, kneejerk reactionaries...so, meh.). I remember my English 102 (research paper) "professor" who was utterly unable to comprehend my 40 pg term paper (on its way to publication in an international tech trade journal)...he just slashed an A across the top...did not even bother opening the thing...and why should he? He knew it was already being published...
So, the question in my mind is what do you do with kids who at 12 or 14 don't know what they "want to do with the rest of their life"? I had no idea at 12 or 14 what was even available.
The Brits ran into this problem and they had untold numbers of "pipe fitters" and "masons" on the dole, unable to work but a job or two a year because their country was overrun with people in these "trades" having tested low at 12 or 14.
Is there a fix-all for this? No. But our current system clearly is not working because it operates in the OTHER direction, but not "for the kids," rather it does so, so "teachers" will feel as if they are "education professionals." Fixt THAT and you fix the schools. Bring "shop" back to the middle schools and let kids at that age see what interests them. My older brother was able, through electronics shop to discover/grow his skills into becoming one of the nations foremost authorities on a type of computer programming. My younger brother discovered his knack for "fixing" things and is now the top tech where he works.
I was more intellectual than either, but because I sucked at math, the system deemed me "dummy" and that's how they tracked me back in the day. Today, they would ignore my brothers' skills and try to force them into college directions neither had any interest in or skills toward. Today, I'd probably make out pretty well.
But the kids who have no aptitude for intellectual pursuits? The sytem, protecting the egos of teachers says: screw 'em!
Tokie