Argue With Everyone Political Forums  

Go Back   Argue With Everyone Political Forums > General Political Debate > Economics and the Economy

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #21 (permalink)  
Old 01-17-2007, 01:34 PM
Deadshot's Avatar
Political Mastermind
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Around Kansas City, Missouri
Posts: 1,144
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by nathanbforrest45 View Post
You want to know what I can't stand? I can't stand being demonized at every turn by the radical left like IHNR and his ilk. I can't stand that "thinking for oneself" in liberal terms is thinking as they tell us to think because after all they know the one true answer and anyone who disagrees is obviously a yahoo.

But here's the rub, in this case, Iraq, and maybe only this case the Liberals were right and the Conservatives were wrong.

Give Cindy Shehan a break. Not on your life. I believe she is totally mentally unstable and is perhaps the main reason her son joined the military in the first place, to get away from her stupidity. Her husband left her for the same reason. I don't believe she harbors anything for this country other than hatred. I believe she is being willingly used by Americas enemies.

Wow. You not only slam a bereving mother, you slam her slain son by saying he only joined the military to get away from her.

Your statements speak for themselves, nat.


I am sorry Deadshot, I don't believe leftist love America, I believe given the opportunity they would all remake it in the vision of Stalin or Castro.

Stalin who brutally murdered millions of his people then threw millions away we fighting tanks with men with rifles.

Castro who's watched an island paradise turn into a third world country in 40 years time.

You don't know "leftist America."


Either they are completely stupid about the fact that liberalism (modern liberalism, which is actually socialism) does not work, never has, never will or they do understand that their policies is nothing more than a way to control those they believe are less intelligent than they are (which is everyone who is not a liberal) and are the personification of evil.

What fascinates me about your comments is that is exactly what the far left says about the right.
  1. Capitalism is failing, people are left to suffer and the rich get richer as the poor get poorer.
  2. Conservatives are not smart
  3. Conservatives are evil.

It's those sweeping statements that seperate us. Socialism is not the answer, but niether is total Capitalism. We have socialist things in our society now - Social Security, Medicaid, Medicare, Disability and Welfare. Capitalism can be made a little "nicer" we've proven it.

Both sides have smart people, if they didn't one side would dominate the other.

Neither side is evil, but both sides have evil in them.

That's the difference between you and I, Nat. You refuse to see any good in my side, I do see the good in your side, I just want you to change and become more balanced. I'm conservative on crime, but liberal on prostitution and drugs. I'm conservative on defense, but liberal on diplomacy. Liberal on social issues, but conservative on private issues. I want a balance, probably leaning left. You want it all.


To me capitalism is the only economic system that allows complete freedom. And while we have never been a completely capitalistic country the closer we were to it the more the country prospered and grew.

Read this article, Lou Dobbs, 17 Jan 07 We've got 48 million without Health Insurance, 8 million of them children. Is capitalism the best system, yeah the best we know of. But we can do better for those 8 million kids and 40 million without health coverage.


As far as Bush making mistakes in the Iraq war, yes he has, its has taken him a long time to admit it and for that I am truly sorry. But so did Lincoln in the early stages of the War between the States. Would you have clamoured for Lincoln to have stopped trying to restore the Union because of those early loses? I believe Bush's mistakes were not giving us the shock and awe he promised, for trying to fight a politically correct war. If we are going to be the victors we must fight like we mean it.
The war in Iraq is hardly the same as what Lincoln faced. Bush is nowhere close to Lincoln. Bush's mistakes have been as much about arrogance then anything else. Lincoln made the right decisions concerning picking his generals, they failed in the face of other generals like Jackson, Longstreet and Lee. Bush's mistakes have been due to policy errors and expectations of Iraq.

As far as fighting like we mean it, what do you propose? You must remember that we want Iraq as an ally both now and in the future. Going through the country killing every possible terrorist will not win us any allies in the region, yet alone turn Iraq into what Bush promised, a Democratic ally in the Middle East.
__________________

Fear leads to Anger...Anger leads to Hate...Hate leads to Suffering.
Reply With Quote
  #22 (permalink)  
Old 01-17-2007, 03:46 PM
Machiavelli Incarnate
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 12,209
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Sam View Post
George I think you are the only who posted who knows what it is. Cat knows and has spoke of it. It has had the most impact on why the militias have taken such a stronghold. I wonder if it is possible to reverse its effects completely.
I don't think it's possible to reverse its effects at all. The hate is building. It's not going to subside any time soon. We yanked the cork out of that bottle.
Reply With Quote
  #23 (permalink)  
Old 01-17-2007, 10:17 PM
Sam's Avatar
Sam Sam is offline
Machiavelli Incarnate
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Oregon
Posts: 6,847
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Deadshot View Post
The solution was NOT TO BE THERE IN THE FIRST PLACE!!!! So many told Bush that.

Jeez, rob you talk about taking responsibility. I've seen so many conservatives willing to reduce welfare to talk to a 20 year old with three kids about what she "should have done" and "how you screwed up your life" without offering a solution, a la Welfare. Isn't this the same thing?

As to a solution pick up the Iraq Study Groups report or a bill by Democratic Senator Levin each saying that the USA should begin handing over power to Iraq and NOT building up anything. We came with solutions, they were ignored. In fact eh Iraq Study Group was there to aide the Prez!!!

So come on, we tried solutions, you ignored us until this November.
Deadshot I think i have arrived where you are. I know this invasion was on poorly chosen intel and possibly intentionally misleading intel but I think we need to stay. I think our mishandling and possibly intentional misleading of the US into invading Iraq is clear. Discussing what and how it went wrong will keep the lines from being blurred. I agree that now with all this we cannot leave but is 20,000+ troops enough to repair the damage?
Reply With Quote
  #24 (permalink)  
Old 01-17-2007, 10:35 PM
Machiavelli Incarnate
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 13,248
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Sam View Post
Deadshot I think i have arrived where you are. I know this invasion was on poorly chosen intel and possibly intentionally misleading intel but I think we need to stay. I think our mishandling and possibly intentional misleading of the US into invading Iraq is clear. Discussing what and how it went wrong will keep the lines from being blurred. I agree that now with all this we cannot leave but is 20,000+ troops enough to repair the damage?
I don't think the 20K troops will accomplish much in the big scheme of things either. I am sure they will help in some areas but not enough to make a difference.

I was against it at first, but am going back to look at the idea of partioning Iraq. I was initially against the idea because I think that us having a hand in allowing the Kurds independence (and I think it would be good for them, but not necessarily Iraq). If the Kurds gain an independent state it presents problems with the Kurds in Turkey and the Kurds in Iran. They would be left on an island so to speak because I don't see anyone helping them. Plus, who gets control of the prime oil fields? That would be a fight in and of itself. I still think it might be a foolhardy idea, but am going to give it another look.

Ideally a strong leader who is willing to work to unite at least some of the Sunni and Shia needs to come to the forefront. Thing is, something like that can't be forced.
Reply With Quote
  #25 (permalink)  
Old 01-17-2007, 10:35 PM
Sam's Avatar
Sam Sam is offline
Machiavelli Incarnate
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Oregon
Posts: 6,847
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by nathanbforrest45 View Post
Let me start by saying I am not mad, I merely do not like Sam.

No, I am not as articulate as Sam or Bark or several others on this board. I only know that I believe in capitalism, God, my family and in the overall goodness in the concept of the United States of America.

And God knows I would rather live in Conservative Tennesse with all its problems than in left wing Oregon any day of the week.
I can hardly believe I am wasting time responding to you but Natthan I do not care if you dislike me. I do find it odd you follow my posts such as this one without really discussing the post at all. I find it odd you start threads on Oregon and then complain if I respond with an answer. I really do not dislike you at all I just find your constant following of my posts with silly comments strange. Jump in if you disagree and tell why you like Bremer.

If I do not care for someone on the forum I sure would not follow their posts and waste my time with 4 posts wisecracking. If they started a thread that interested me I might decide to post but that was clearly not the case.

Anyway Natthan despite you following my posts with silly wisecracks i really do not mind nor do I dislike you. I just find it all odd.Like you I value my country,my family, God, responsible capitalism so I am not sure what your point is.


Okay now back to Bremer. Does anyone here think he was the "fall guy" or did he lay the foundation for the situation we have today?
Reply With Quote
  #26 (permalink)  
Old 01-17-2007, 11:48 PM
Sam's Avatar
Sam Sam is offline
Machiavelli Incarnate
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Oregon
Posts: 6,847
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dom1 View Post
I don't think the 20K troops will accomplish much in the big scheme of things either. I am sure they will help in some areas but not enough to make a difference.

I was against it at first, but am going back to look at the idea of partioning Iraq. I was initially against the idea because I think that us having a hand in allowing the Kurds independence (and I think it would be good for them, but not necessarily Iraq). If the Kurds gain an independent state it presents problems with the Kurds in Turkey and the Kurds in Iran. They would be left on an island so to speak because I don't see anyone helping them. Plus, who gets control of the prime oil fields? That would be a fight in and of itself. I still think it might be a foolhardy idea, but am going to give it another look.

Ideally a strong leader who is willing to work to unite at least some of the Sunni and Shia needs to come to the forefront. Thing is, something like that can't be forced.
Yes your last sentence may be the missing piece of the puzzle. Someone who can lead and bring them together. Not an easy task. I can support a temporary troop surge but with very close scrutiny, accountability and a plan. Another thought of mine is if 20,000 is not enough then why do it. If we really need 50,000 wouldn't that be the way to go and secure the country not just bandaid violence for awhile. I do not know but I think it is now or never as patience is gone and Iraq has turned into a place where no one is safe except possibly the North.

Again a three state solution would have to address oil revenues and military protection.
Reply With Quote
  #27 (permalink)  
Old 01-18-2007, 09:21 AM
nathanbforrest45's Avatar
Machiavelli Incarnate
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: mountains of East TN
Posts: 10,592
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Sam View Post
I can hardly believe I am wasting time responding to you but Natthan I do not care if you dislike me. I do find it odd you follow my posts such as this one without really discussing the post at all. I find it odd you start threads on Oregon and then complain if I respond with an answer. I really do not dislike you at all I just find your constant following of my posts with silly comments strange. Jump in if you disagree and tell why you like Bremer.

If I do not care for someone on the forum I sure would not follow their posts and waste my time with 4 posts wisecracking. If they started a thread that interested me I might decide to post but that was clearly not the case.

Anyway Natthan despite you following my posts with silly wisecracks i really do not mind nor do I dislike you. I just find it all odd.Like you I value my country,my family, God, responsible capitalism so I am not sure what your point is.


Okay now back to Bremer. Does anyone here think he was the "fall guy" or did he lay the foundation for the situation we have today?

I told you why I don't like you, I think you are an arrogant twit, a true liberal who knows all the answers. When I first came across your post they were all of the "I have done more than you have" You just "knew" too much about too many things so frankly I thought you were a fraud, still do in fact.

Don't care if you like me or not. If I ever met you in person I would be cordial but I would still think you were an arrogant twit

Be of good cheer
Reply With Quote
  #28 (permalink)  
Old 01-18-2007, 10:51 AM
Sam's Avatar
Sam Sam is offline
Machiavelli Incarnate
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Oregon
Posts: 6,847
Default

Okay I get it you do not like me! I will not waste my energy not liking you. In fact i hope somethng great happens for you today that you do not have to waste your spare time chasing a girl you have not met around a forum. Now That settled why waste your time following all my threads making wisecracks(ala Jiimy style w/o the profanity) or comments with no subtance. Enjoy life a little and find topics you like to discuss.Have a great day Natthan and may God be with you Peace

Now back to Iraq,the missing bilions and Bremer...does anyone think he was the "fall guy?" or just his failed policy was so greedy and great that here we are untangling the mess of it now.

Last edited by Sam; 01-18-2007 at 10:53 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #29 (permalink)  
Old 01-18-2007, 11:13 AM
OkhamsRazor's Avatar
Political Mastermind
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Michigan
Posts: 2,429
Send a message via MSN to OkhamsRazor
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by rob View Post

The adminstration has made mistakes, but continuing to knock the mistakes without offering a solution is just plain stupid.
I would beg to differ on this point rob. There is nothing wrong with pointing out "mistakes" (though they knew exactly what they were doing), hell, they should be dragged by their feet into the light so that we may all see these "mistakes" for what they truly are. I would further submit that much of life is not knowing which is the "right" answer, path, course, but being able to quickly identify which are the wrongs ones.

Further, as crow pointed out, when a group of people "screw the pooch" so badly that there are no viable "right" answers or solutions, then it is you that are setting up roadblocks to progress. Advocating that we stay in the line of fire because there isn't a truce on the table is ridiculous and quite frankly, obstructionist posturing.

Lastly rob, there is nothing wrong with being a conservative... unless you're running for office (same goes for Dems), but continuing to support Strausian Neo-Cons which OBVIOUSLY share NOTHING with the conservatives is... is.... well.... stupid.
__________________
S.O.S. ------ United We Stand, Divided We Fall
Reply With Quote
  #30 (permalink)  
Old 01-18-2007, 09:50 PM
I_Hate_the_Nazi_Right's Avatar
Machiavelli Incarnate
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 6,355
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by nathanbforrest45 View Post
Rob, all you need to say is she is a liberal, all the rest of your qualifiers is taken for granted
Just like when we utter Neocon which instantly means ASSHOLE.
__________________
Those who would give up Essential Liberty to purchase a little Temporary Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety.

Benjamin Franklin

The government of the United States is not, in any sense, founded on the Christian religion.

John Adams from the " Treaty of Tripoly, article 11
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On
Forum Jump


» Navigation

Political Links Page

Blogs by AWE Members

Advertisers support this site - if you're interested in their product, take a look!


$5 monthly donation:

$10 monthly donation:



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:02 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.2.0