Argue With Everyone Political Forums  

Go Back   Argue With Everyone Political Forums > General Political Debate > Economics and the Economy

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 09-18-2008, 09:57 PM
Sam's Avatar
Sam Sam is offline
Machiavelli Incarnate
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Oregon
Posts: 6,843
Default AIG bailout

I know there must be a thread on this, but I cannot seem to find it.

My BIL is in the reinsurance industry and according to him consumers were never threatened concerning insurance failure and the AIG's consumer insurance units are completely well-capitalized because the law requires it.

We bailed them out because of their financial products division and basically are saving them from their inability to manage risks in investments.

Who else are we going to bailout?
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 09-18-2008, 09:58 PM
jebe's Avatar
Machiavelli Incarnate
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: somewhere between a rock and a hard place
Posts: 5,453
Default

thats; PENNSYLVANIA FIRE and CAUSUALTY.
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 09-18-2008, 10:30 PM
wvpeach's Avatar
Machiavelli Incarnate
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: West Virginia ( Gods Country)
Posts: 6,590
Default

It appears Sam we are about to bail out everybody. And not just companies that are failing now. I would say the feds mean to bail out all who fail for the foreseeable future.

Maybe even Lehman brothers will be resurrected now. Why not it appears they mean to save everybody.


And your BIL was right . Insurance policies weren't the problem. finanical products like annuities were at the most risk in the AIG mess.
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 09-18-2008, 11:16 PM
Machiavelli Incarnate
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 13,248
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Sam View Post
We bailed them out because of their financial products division and basically are saving them from their inability to manage risks in investments.
I disagree. The federal government bailed AIG out because of the influence on the "literally trillions of dollars" (according to NPR) in mutual funds, which most people on here are invested in. Therefore, anyone with mutual funds could be threatened. They were also worried that people would lose faith in banks and a possible run on banks could occur. Also, AIG had worldwide implications, not just implications here in the US.

Also, according to NPR, they said that the government might actually make some money off of this because of the assets which can be sold off as well as some gaining some money off of interest.

Even with that I don't think they should have bailed them out. I say let bad companies die, it just makes room for solid companies.
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old 09-19-2008, 12:25 AM
Doug Rozenek's Avatar
Political Junkie
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Canton, Ohio
Posts: 284
Default

It seems (if rumors are correct) that the big 3 automakers are next in line for the big govt handouts of taxpayer money. I find this to be entirely revolting in all ways. These companies have run themselves into the ground out of sheer greed and it bit them in the ass.... now we get to pay for it. The govt would have done better giving the money to we the people to pay bills with. That would have saved the companies and the citizens... but the govt don't care about the citizens because we don't donate millions to campaign funds etc.
__________________
Drummer, Songwriter
Culture Shock
www.culture-shock.us

Co-Owner
www.pennypincherpromotional.com
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old 09-19-2008, 12:45 AM
cat's meow's Avatar
Machiavelli Incarnate
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Mid-south
Posts: 12,078
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Sam View Post
I know there must be a thread on this, but I cannot seem to find it.

My BIL is in the reinsurance industry and according to him consumers were never threatened concerning insurance failure and the AIG's consumer insurance units are completely well-capitalized because the law requires it.

We bailed them out because of their financial products division and basically are saving them from their inability to manage risks in investments.

Who else are we going to bailout?
Good question and I wonder myself. This is a Catch 22. The situation is a no win because of the problems that have piled up and how they have to get dealt with. They had to take immediate action but bailing out a private company like this sets a bad example.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On
Forum Jump


» Navigation

Political Links Page

Blogs by AWE Members

Advertisers support this site - if you're interested in their product, take a look!


$5 monthly donation:

$10 monthly donation:



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:22 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.2.0