Argue With Everyone Political Forums  

Go Back   Argue With Everyone Political Forums > General Political Debate > Economics and the Economy
Register Blogs FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

View Poll Results: The price of oil is at $125 a barrel because
Free markets never work; speculators make prices too high 0 0%
Cheney set the price at $125 in his 2001 secret meetings 2 50.00%
The US is no longer able to subsidize oil over production 1 25.00%
Al Gore's carbon tax is the reason oil is so expensive 1 25.00%
Voters: 4. You may not vote on this poll

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 05-12-2008, 05:43 PM
mulp's Avatar
Political Mastermind
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Merrimack, NH
Posts: 2,486
Default Do you believe in free markets and that the price of oil should be $125?

For some context and analysis, see
http://www.nytimes.com/2008/05/12/op...hp&oref=slogin

It is my view that the price of oil is where its at because those who have the most oil are realizing that their oil is much more valuable in the ground than being sold at fire sale prices to the US which will simple burn it as if burning hundred dollar bills.

So, what's your view?
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 05-12-2008, 06:03 PM
cat's meow's Avatar
Machiavelli Incarnate
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Mid-south
Posts: 10,956
Default

I think Krugman does have some valuable things to say. Good article Mulp.

Here's what I 'got.'

Supply and demand is all fine and dandy, and yes, China is becoming a bigger consumer of oil but what Krugman does miss here is the ME oil cartel of OPEC. OPEC sets production---prices, and the rest of the market basically follows. The oil, energy producing countries of South America are trying to organize into a cartel also so to wield this type of power.

Remember when Mr. Bush met with the Saudis just recently? He begged them to raise production to help the US out. They basically laughed in his face. One of the biggest underlying factors in terms of oil production and open market 'worth' is the fact that a long, ongoing war in Iraq still exists. There is no better excuse for high prices of a specific commodity than war. Oil is essential and oil is the commidity of the ME, Iraq sits squarely in the middle of those oil producing fields/countries. It is no surprise that oil has gone through the roof during the years since the invasion of Iraq in 2003. Dick Cheney (et al) truly fooled himself into thinking Chalabi was right and the invasion would create no mess; the oil fields would be safe and in control by friendly allies. It just has not worked out this way at all, it was not going to. Notice that Clinton never took on a task of invading Iraq or any ME country this way, the price of oil never rose this quickly during his 8 years in office...he knew the realities of starting a war over there and how it would be linked to the U.S. dependence on oil.
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 05-12-2008, 06:40 PM
noneof yourbusiness's Avatar
Machiavelli Incarnate
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 12,697
Default

Ill tell you I dont an most I know dont belive for a second that this increasin in prices or any increasse ever for that matter has been A "natural" market occuracne. Its gouging and artfical infaltion.
__________________
Cussing out low class inbreds isnt uninteligent, its honest

Good typing is not inteligent its dexiteritous.

Everything you just said is total bullshit

Patriotism is the last refuge of a scoundrel.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-V8Ek...eature=related
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 05-12-2008, 09:36 PM
Machiavelli Incarnate
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 12,498
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by mulp View Post
It is my view that the price of oil is where its at because those who have the most oil are realizing that their oil is much more valuable in the ground than being sold at fire sale prices to the US which will simple burn it as if burning hundred dollar bills.
I agree to an extent. It makes sense for the Saudis and others to cut supply, which they are doing.

Quote:
Originally Posted by cat's meow View Post
I think Krugman does have some valuable things to say. Good article Mulp.

Here's what I 'got.'

Supply and demand is all fine and dandy, and yes, China is becoming a bigger consumer of oil but what Krugman does miss here is the ME oil cartel of OPEC. OPEC sets production---prices, and the rest of the market basically follows. The oil, energy producing countries of South America are trying to organize into a cartel also so to wield this type of power.

Remember when Mr. Bush met with the Saudis just recently? He begged them to raise production to help the US out. They basically laughed in his face. One of the biggest underlying factors in terms of oil production and open market 'worth' is the fact that a long, ongoing war in Iraq still exists. There is no better excuse for high prices of a specific commodity than war. Oil is essential and oil is the commidity of the ME, Iraq sits squarely in the middle of those oil producing fields/countries. It is no surprise that oil has gone through the roof during the years since the invasion of Iraq in 2003. Dick Cheney (et al) truly fooled himself into thinking Chalabi was right and the invasion would create no mess; the oil fields would be safe and in control by friendly allies. It just has not worked out this way at all, it was not going to. Notice that Clinton never took on a task of invading Iraq or any ME country this way, the price of oil never rose this quickly during his 8 years in office...he knew the realities of starting a war over there and how it would be linked to the U.S. dependence on oil.
Schumer also called the Saudis out for cutting supply. He said that was part of the reason for the prices.

War is part of the reason Cat, if you think it is the primary reason you aren't really looking very deeply into it.
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old 05-12-2008, 10:16 PM
cat's meow's Avatar
Machiavelli Incarnate
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Mid-south
Posts: 10,956
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dom1 View Post
War is part of the reason Cat, if you think it is the primary reason you aren't really looking very deeply into it.
Again, I added into Krugman's commentary; I provided what he missed. If there was not a war oil would be less, how more less I cannot tell you exactly.
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old 05-13-2008, 12:09 AM
Political Mastermind
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 1,232
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by mulp View Post
For some context and analysis, see
http://www.nytimes.com/2008/05/12/op...hp&oref=slogin

It is my view that the price of oil is where its at because those who have the most oil are realizing that their oil is much more valuable in the ground than being sold at fire sale prices to the US which will simple burn it as if burning hundred dollar bills.

So, what's your view?
I think oil and a few other industries have proven that with such a heavy influence in the government they can have complete and total chaotic reign over entire populaces. These oil men are the same as the arms manufacturers, corrupt to the core but large and in charge.
That being said, free trade generally is a brilliant idea internally. I believe heavily in import taxes, though, thats just good mercantilism.
Having complete control of an industry via trusts (collective monopolies) makes you a threat to free trade when the product you are selling is essential to our lifestyle. Food, water, energy, weapons and communications.

Last edited by Suburbanite : 05-13-2008 at 12:12 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old 05-13-2008, 10:46 AM
mulp's Avatar
Political Mastermind
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Merrimack, NH
Posts: 2,486
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by noneof yourbusiness View Post
Ill tell you I dont an most I know dont belive for a second that this increasin in prices or any increasse ever for that matter has been A "natural" market occuracne. Its gouging and artfical infaltion.
I bet that's what you said to your parents when they wouldn't give you as much money as you wanted, telling you "its my money, I worked hard for it, go work for your own money."

Anyone who thinks that the Saudi should price their oil for less and pump more to make sure the price never goes higher than that set price is part of the conservatives "we deserve free lunch" crowd.
Reply With Quote
  #8 (permalink)  
Old 05-13-2008, 10:57 AM
wow's Avatar
wow wow is online now
Machiavelli Incarnate
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: TEXAS
Posts: 4,415
Default

OPEC had profits of $674 Billion in 2007.
OPEC donated $50,000 in charity in 2007.

OPEC needs to be hit with a windfall profit tax.
OPEC needs to buy carbon credits that offset all carbon released by their oil production and use of their oil around the world.
__________________
Drill offshore now
Reply With Quote
  #9 (permalink)  
Old 05-13-2008, 10:49 PM
mulp's Avatar
Political Mastermind
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Merrimack, NH
Posts: 2,486
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by wow View Post
OPEC had profits of $674 Billion in 2007.
OPEC donated $50,000 in charity in 2007.

OPEC needs to be hit with a windfall profit tax.
OPEC needs to buy carbon credits that offset all carbon released by their oil production and use of their oil around the world.
Better to invoke economic sanctions against them, a worldwide boycott on buying oil.

Force them to switching to harvesting the sun.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



» Navigation
Political Links Page

Blogs by AWE Members

Advertisers support this site - if you're interested in their product, take a look!




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:38 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
LinkBacks Enabled by vBSEO 3.1.0
Poltical Topsites PolitiPoll.net - Political Web Rankings