 |
|

01-06-2008, 02:04 PM
|
|
Political Novice
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 13
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Badmutha
Jkay--welcome to you--but prepare your liberal ideology for punishment. Whats the Iraq war cost at?--600 Billion I believe. The costs for a SIX year war for freedom--is about the same amont we spend EVERY YEAR in this country on the democrat provided social tit.
|
What world are you living in?? The war for freedom? Are you freaking kidding me? The Iraq war has never been about freedom....although the "term" has been used quite frequently as one (of many ever changing) talking points for this illegal and immoral war.
Quote:
|
George Bush cut taxes for the evil rich--and the government still brought in RECORD HIGH TAX REVENUES! Government cut taxes--and yet the government was still able to collect more taxes--I know this is hard for libs to understand.
|
I would burst out in laughter is this wasn't so pathetically twisted. The economy SUCKS, there is a housing CRISIS and we are facing (if not entering) a RECESSION.
Shrub and Co are directly responsible for the free fall this country is in and you have the balls to sing praises of this worm? Again, what universe are you living in?
Quote:
|
Jkay--if you live in a bowl--and I tell you your going to drown if you stay in this bowl--and you still freely decide to remain in the bowl--are you going to blame me when the water reaches your neck? The people of New Orleans are morons--who decided to stay in the bowl. And those who were helpless to get themselves out of the bowl (questionable place to live for handicapped or elderly maybe?)--were left behind by Democrat mayor School Bus Nagin (D) as well as Democrat William Jefferson (D) who decided the bribe money stashed in his freezer was worth saving--while his fellow human beings were not. And to top it off--NAGIN WAS RE-ELECTED--truely a city of liberal morons--next time let them stay in the bowl--the average IQ of Americans will rise along with the water level.
|
Ahhh I see your universe now. You are one of the elite, the powerful, pulled yourself up by your bootstraps, did ya?
I'm really not impressed with anyone blaming the poor, disabled, elderly, resource-less citizens for the lack of movement by Shrub et al.
New Orleans citizens were not helped mainly because of their demographics but also to "show" us Americans how government programs really "don't work".
I'll say it again. Those who don't believe in government have NO BUSINESS participating in it.
|

01-06-2008, 02:37 PM
|
 |
Machiavelli Incarnate
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 3,873
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by JKay
What world are you living in?? The war for freedom? Are you freaking kidding me? The Iraq war has never been about freedom....although the "term" has been used quite frequently as one (of many ever changing) talking points for this illegal and immoral war.
|
Oh Jkay--not another moveon.lib--I thought we were just talking about the cost of war--and as expected you conceded that argument and moved on to your next talking point. And next you will tell me it was a War For Oil! Which must be why the cost of oil is so affordable--because were stealing all that Iraqi oil right?
Quote:
I would burst out in laughter is this wasn't so pathetically twisted. The economy SUCKS, there is a housing CRISIS and we are facing (if not entering) a RECESSION.
Shrub and Co are directly responsible for the free fall this country is in and you have the balls to sing praises of this worm? Again, what universe are you living in?
|
What happened to the tax discussion?--I see were movingon.again. The housing crisis is a major factor--but what could Bush personally have done to avoid it. Do you Jkay want the government to hold your wallet for you--do you want government to control the housing and mortgage markets--is that part of your ideology comrade?
Quote:
|
Ahhh I see your universe now. You are one of the elite, the powerful, pulled yourself up by your bootstraps, did ya?
|
Not at all--just an average everyday citizen who believes in self reposnisblity and accountability--as well as common sense thinking--the things liberals tend to disagree with.
Quote:
|
I'm really not impressed with anyone blaming the poor, disabled, elderly, resource-less citizens for the lack of movement by Shrub et al.
|
I was never blaming them--they are the ones that truely needed help--and those are the ones that Nagin (D) and Jefferson (D) left behind. Just as I dont blame those that suck on the democrat provided social tit--its human nature to accept "free" money.
Quote:
New Orleans citizens were not helped mainly because of their demographics but also to "show" us Americans how government programs really "don't work".
I'll say it again. Those who don't believe in government have NO BUSINESS participating in it.
|
Ill say it again--stay in the bowl--just quit coming to me when it floods time after time after time.
|

01-06-2008, 03:04 PM
|
 |
Machiavelli Incarnate
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: West Virginia ( Gods Country)
Posts: 6,639
|
|
Actually Tokie
You and I once again miracles of all miracles agree .
I do not believe welfare moms should stay on welfare , if they can't get their acts together I agree put the kids in orphanages till they do . They would be better off. But you sound knowledgeable about the reforms so you should know that is what the 2 year time limit is all about . They either get work training and get a job or they get dumped off anyway. Sure they can have another baby and stretch the time out to 5 years , but that is the max now days and they get booted for life . I think we can err on the side of caution and afford the current program . I'd like to see it tightened further , maybe that will happen .
I agree young able bodied men should not get welfare . And they do not . They are not eligible and you know it tokie . Now they might be living off some woman who does , but they cannot get a dime for themselves and I think you knew that tokie . And after all we cannot go about policing who women sleep with now can we ?
I disagree who ever gets in the white house next go around is not going to get a chance to break the bank as you say. The country is too far in debt to start spending huge money on social programs till we get the debt down .
Otherwise we agree
Oh , I believe people should be in this country legally or not at all . Its a security issue really after 911 . We should not have people pouring across our southern border , they could be terrorists . I say round them all up and send them home and close our borders. So your last point was way off target .
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tokenconservative
Yes...I also realize that they were not Clinton's welfare reforms...he gritted his teeth and signed, because the Rs in Congress were prepared to overide his veto and make him look like an even bigger fool.
The Dems have been desperate to roll those reforms back ever since, even more so after their (your) scenarios, shrieked from your media, that babies would be starving in the street and old people would be turned into soylent green did not come to pass, and that in fact, folks who HAD been on welfare unto the 3rd generation (hey, I used to work in "the projects" and would see the same young, able-bodied men standing around drinking all day long, day after day...), went out and found jobs that did not exist (according to you) and made themselves productive.
Go break open your piggy bank, Peach. Let's put some $$ on it: if a socialist gets the White House (very likely) and the socialists have a clear majority in Congress (less likely, but it 'could happen) the 1994 welfare reforms will be as dust in the wind.
You up for it? $5K?
I don't, by the way, have a problem with welfare the way it is today. In a large economy such as ours (I am not satv....I don't believe we can screw the canlendar back to 1785) we need to have in place SOME government/backed programs to help those who truly need it.
Should we be giving welfare to 20 year old, able-bodied/minded men? Um..no, if they can't find a job in our economy today, they deserve to starve and die.
Should we give it to the disabled, the elderly, the mentally handicapped? Yep. Drunks and druggies who choose to love on the street? Um...no. Welfare mothers who can't read the directions on a condom packet? Um..not so much, no. Their kids? Yeah. Take them away, to foster care and they can be cared for there if "Mom" can't either keep her knees together or figure out how to apply the free "patch" she got from the clinic.
As a lefty, you of course believe all the nonsense you are fed by your media: "the poor" are all down on their luck abused women with their three kids living in their car after being chased out of their house by their abusive, drunken chronically unemployed husbands.
Right...in maybe, .000003% of the cases.
Most people who are on welfare are deadbeats who know how to work the system--and illegal aliens. I would imagine you have no problem at all with your husband's taxes going up to make sure our "brothers and sisters" from south of the border get free schooling (and free breakfast and lunch), free medical care, energy assistance in the winter and of course foodstamps,etc.
It's only right, huh?
Tokie
Tokie
|
|

01-06-2008, 03:33 PM
|
 |
Machiavelli Incarnate
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: West Virginia ( Gods Country)
Posts: 6,639
|
|
Except you have no clue what you are talking about badmutha
I cannot count the number of loud mouth men I have met on the internet , on christian discussion forums no less . Who rant on and on about their tax money being spent on bums and welfare whores and it has to stop all social programs should stop . These kinda guys are usually on the net 24/7 , so eventually somebody gets around to asking them what they do for a living , they reply I am on disability insurance .
The conversation pretty much goes like this from there .
Dead beat SSD bum: I hurt my back at work and have a lot of pain.
I smashed my hand at work and have a lot of pain
I broke my leg and its never healed right
(whatever pick your illness , they have them all)
Forum Member : Really did you have surgery ? Sorry to hear that man , hope your doing better.
Dead Beat SSD Bum: Oh I am doing all right , had a hard time getting the social security to pay for my Oxycotin ( perceset - darvon Pick your poison they take them all) Had a hard time getting the SSI to keep paying for my prescriptions last month , but my doctor wrote them a letter and That is all fixed.
Forum Member : Uh , dead beat , tell me why are you crying about social programs and tax payer money when you are living on one????
Dead Beat SSD BUM : I am not on welfare , I am on a insurance program I paid for . Just collecting my insurance is all.
Forum Member : How long you been on disability ?
Dead Beat SSD BUM , OH just for 5 years , I tried to go back to work , but my butt hurt and I couldn't afford my prescriptions , so I had to give that up .
Forum Member : Well man I hope you realize that that insurance program you are talking about is social security disability and tax payers pay for it and if you have been on it for 5 years , you have collected way more than you could have possibly ever have paid in .
Dead Beat SSD Bum: Well its better I get it then some welfare whore , besides my doctor says I may never get better , so I am trying to get permanent disability and if they give it to whores , they can by God give it to me.
These people are the real problem with the system , and their are millions of them abusing the system. I have found lots on line and know a few in person. (Barely I hate a man who could work , but won't . )
And often these people men and women live alone and suck off the system for small aches and pains most of us wake up every day to due to aging . What is really the case is that during some surgery or accident , they became prescription pill addicts and have to stay on social security disability to get their drugs. But they are in for a big fat surprise when Bush passed his prescription drug package for the elderly , he put in clauses against social security and medicaid paying for the addictive drugs like the pain killers these people are hooked on . Come 2010 , they will not be able to get their dope from the social security disability program . Not without having a real physical problem , because the guidelines are tough to get pain meds paid for my tax payer money after 2010 . That is one good thing President Bush has done.
Badmutha Please tell me you are not one of these social security disability bums? ...............Please tell me your not.
You sure do sound like some of the ones I have run into.
Please tell me your not. My faith in humanity is waning
Quote:
Originally Posted by Badmutha
Preach--I want welfare ended--and I collect nothing from the government. If you collect money from the democrat provided social tit--you surely dont want that "free" check eliminated. There are thousands of Paid Democrat Voters--who suck on and are reliant on the democrat provided social tit--how can you possibly think these people want that tit removed from their mouth. They dont--they love the tit--they will vote democrat to keep the tit in their mouth--and by no means do they want anyone to cut off the conservative milk.
Social spending is the problem--it consumes the majority of our budget--and its going to bankrupt this country
|
|

01-06-2008, 03:35 PM
|
 |
Machiavelli Incarnate
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: West Virginia ( Gods Country)
Posts: 6,639
|
|
Well said JKay
And welcome to the forum.
Quote:
Originally Posted by JKay
No, I don't think you're tuned in at all. If you can so easily look away from the cost this war has on America. The money is huge! (unfortunately I can't post the URL because I'm a new member....Google it yourself)
The neglect of basic needs of Americans, not to mention our returning vets is shameful.
I will never understand how anyone can rationalize the rape that Shrub & Co has done to this country.
|
|

01-06-2008, 03:36 PM
|
|
Political Novice
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 13
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Badmutha
Oh Jkay--not another moveon.lib--I thought we were just talking about the cost of war--and as expected you conceded that argument and moved on to your next talking point. And next you will tell me it was a War For Oil! Which must be why the cost of oil is so affordable--because were stealing all that Iraqi oil right?
|
You really don't get it do you?
War for Oil
War for Freedom
War on Terror
Call it whatever you want to call it. It doesn't change what it is. It's an illegal, blood sucking, money leeching exercise brought on by this administration.
Quote:
|
What happened to the tax discussion?--I see were movingon.again. The housing crisis is a major factor--but what could Bush personally have done to avoid it. Do you Jkay want the government to hold your wallet for you--do you want government to control the housing and mortgage markets--is that part of your ideology comrade?
|
During the reign of Georgie we've seen bankruptcy reform bill (big business win) along with reverse mortgages (big business win), credit cards being passed out, like beer at a fraternity party, while fees are increased (big business win). What would I like to see a responsible president do?
How about repealing the bankruptcy law or revising it. Usury, and responsible lending practices. (citizen win)
Quote:
|
Not at all--just an average everyday citizen who believes in self reposnisblity and accountability--as well as common sense thinking--the things liberals tend to disagree with.
|
Nope, you just don't value your fellow human beings. That is a typical symptom of "conservative compassion"
Quote:
|
I was never blaming them--they are the ones that truely needed help--and those are the ones that Nagin (D) and Jefferson (D) left behind. Just as I dont blame those that suck on the democrat provided social tit--its human nature to accept "free" money.
|
Again, you are only trying to play the bait and switch game. Who was in charge of FEMA? Oh, it was the horse judge. Appointed by whom? Little Georgie Porgie (R)
Quote:
|
Ill say it again--stay in the bowl--just quit coming to me when it floods time after time after time.
|
I will say it one more time myself. Americans cannot survive this conservative compassion any longer.
|

01-06-2008, 04:03 PM
|
 |
Machiavelli Incarnate
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Southern Illinois
Posts: 3,297
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by mulp
It is the government support for employer healthcare via all sorts of tax subsidies and special legal protections for the corporations and the insurance companies that has done a great deal to make individual policies all but unaffordable to all but the top 10% income earners.
As someone without employer provided healthcare, even with me paying the cost, and as someone without government healthcare, I would love to see the government remove all the subsidies for employer healthcare and pretty much force corporations to drop their group plans. In fact, I think the government should prohibit group healthcare policies force everyone to go to individual plans.
That is the fastest way to single payer healthcare as advocated by Dennis Kucinich.
|
That is one of but many reasons Government intervention makes Healthcare unaffordable for the common person. Your at least acknowledging it. Nice to it come from an honest democrats mouth, instead of the same ole trite about Universal Healthcare plans and stuff.
__________________
"It is the Right of the People to alter or abolish the Government"
Declaration of Independence
"Never trouble another for what you can do for yourself."
Thomas Jefferson
"If you put the federal government in charge of the Sahara Desert, in 5 years there'd be a shortage of sand."
Milton Friedman
|

01-07-2008, 07:32 AM
|
|
Political Mastermind
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: USA
Posts: 1,423
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by wvpeach
Actually Tokie
You and I once again miracles of all miracles agree .
I do not believe welfare moms should stay on welfare , if they can't get their acts together I agree put the kids in orphanages till they do . They would be better off. But you sound knowledgeable about the reforms so you should know that is what the 2 year time limit is all about . They either get work training and get a job or they get dumped off anyway. Sure they can have another baby and stretch the time out to 5 years , but that is the max now days and they get booted for life . I think we can err on the side of caution and afford the current program . I'd like to see it tightened further , maybe that will happen .
I agree young able bodied men should not get welfare . And they do not . They are not eligible and you know it tokie . Now they might be living off some woman who does , but they cannot get a dime for themselves and I think you knew that tokie . And after all we cannot go about policing who women sleep with now can we ?
I disagree who ever gets in the white house next go around is not going to get a chance to break the bank as you say. The country is too far in debt to start spending huge money on social programs till we get the debt down .
Otherwise we agree
Oh , I believe people should be in this country legally or not at all . Its a security issue really after 911 . We should not have people pouring across our southern border , they could be terrorists . I say round them all up and send them home and close our borders. So your last point was way off target .
|
I don't see any reason to tighten it further. I works very well the way it is. Of course, your bretheren on the left, want to roll things back to pre-1994...and have been doing yeomanlike work toward that end since....well, let's see...um, 1994.
When you help elect socialists to both the White House and give them a majority in Congress, given that every years since 1994, the socialists have intro'd legislation to roll back welfare reform..um, I'm just curious: what do YOU think will happen?
Able-bodied young men (or wymyn): No, they should not. That's what I said. I did not say they CURRENTLY were. They WILL be once you help put socialists in charge, though (I was referencing pre-1994 conditions where they most assuredly did get welfare...for life, if they wanted, and many did).
Policing: I believe we SHOULD, though. And we should drug-test those on welfare. If you live in subsidized housing, it is not YOUR house, and so you should give up certain rights...there should be Projects Police who can knock on your door at 2 am and demand to see who is sleeping there. If someone is sleeping there who does not have permission, you should be put out on the street.
The "debt": Social programs outlays combined, dwarf military outlays. Have since The Great Society. I don't see that changing anytime soon, do you?
Illegals: it's both a security and a legal problem. It's less a security (national) problem than a legal one. There is not reason to permit these people to stay here. BOTH sides (it was called Bush-KENNEDY, you may recall) are treasonous in this regard and those at the top, as they have colluded with an invading enemy, should be treated as what they are: traitors. This, in my opinion, includes Bush. But it also includes MOST Dems.
Tokie
|

01-07-2008, 07:36 AM
|
|
Political Mastermind
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: USA
Posts: 1,423
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by JKay
No, I don't think you're tuned in at all. If you can so easily look away from the cost this war has on America. The money is huge! (unfortunately I can't post the URL because I'm a new member....Google it yourself)
The neglect of basic needs of Americans, not to mention our returning vets is shameful.
I will never understand how anyone can rationalize the rape that Shrub & Co has done to this country.
|
I agree the VA needs TOTAL revamping. Understand, this is a socialist undertaking started by a socialist, after all...and it has done what socialist orgs. do: failed.
Once again: (and I don't post links--LIIINKKKKSSSSSS!!! Find it yourself) social programs outlays dwarf military outlays and have since sometime in the late 60s, with Great Society plans.
Of course, you want to utterly emasculate the US militarily, while simultaneously destroying our economy from within by taxing "the rich" (identified as "anyone who makes more'n me!") out of existence.
Say, you know...the Reds did that in the old USSR...how'd that work out for 'em?
Tokie
|

01-07-2008, 07:39 AM
|
|
Political Mastermind
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: USA
Posts: 1,423
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by satv365
That is one of but many reasons Government intervention makes Healthcare unaffordable for the common person. Your at least acknowledging it. Nice to it come from an honest democrats mouth, instead of the same ole trite about Universal Healthcare plans and stuff.
|
I think you may be misreading this guy, SatV.
Here is what he said: It is the government support for employer healthcare via all sorts of tax subsidies and special legal protections for the corporations and the insurance companies that has done a great deal to make individual policies all but unaffordable to all but the top 10% income earners.
As someone without employer provided healthcare, even with me paying the cost, and as someone without government healthcare, I would love to see the government remove all the subsidies for employer healthcare and pretty much force corporations to drop their group plans. In fact, I think the government should prohibit group healthcare policies force everyone to go to individual plans.
That is the fastest way to single payer healthcare as advocated by Dennis Kucinich.
This approach is designed to FORCE the government to enact a single-payer (socialized) medical system. The "single-payer" being well..you and me as working people, through ever more onerous taxation.
I thought that as a libertarian, you opposed such taxation?
Tokie
|
| Thread Tools |
|
|
| Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
|