Argue With Everyone Political Forums  

Go Back   Argue With Everyone Political Forums > General Political Debate > Economics and the Economy

test
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #21 (permalink)  
Old 12-23-2007, 06:33 AM
Political Mastermind
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: USA
Posts: 1,423
Default

Hmm....silence.

I can only take that to mean that no, PulingNorman and his whining, leftist minions in here DON'T understand ...well, purt near anythin' about modern economics.

Thread Closed.

Tokie
Reply With Quote
  #22 (permalink)  
Old 12-23-2007, 07:11 AM
satv365's Avatar
Machiavelli Incarnate
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Southern Illinois
Posts: 3,170
Default

Alternative Minimum Tax (AMT)
Capital gains tax
Corporate income tax
Estate tax in the United States
Excise tax (includes taxes on cigarettes and alcoholic beverages)
Federal income tax
Federal unemployment tax (FUTA)
FICA tax (includes Social Security tax and related programs)
Gasoline tax
Generation Skipping Tax
Gift tax
IRS penalties
Local income tax
Luxury taxes
Property tax
Real estate tax
Recreational vehicle tax
Road usage taxes (Truckers)
Sales tax and equivalent use tax
School tax
State income tax
State unemployment tax (SUTA)
Telephone federal excise tax
Vehicle sales tax
Workers compensation tax
Marriage License tax
Parking Fine tax
Speeding ticket tax
Seatbelt ticket tax
FCC fine tax
Gun license tax
Drivers License fee tax
State Identification Car fee tax
Birth Certificate replacement fee tax
Social security card replacement fee tax
Yard sale permit tax
Leaf Burning permit tax
Liquor license fee tax
Stamp tax



I got a list of a little over 2,000 forms of direct and indirect taxation in the United States. I fail to see how the income tax on wealthy or poor. Corporation or Private Bussiness amounts to a much needed source of Income for the Government.

You people just want to redistribute wealth to the "poor" in the form of social programs that do not work, nor realy benefit society as whole.
__________________
"It is the Right of the People to alter or abolish the Government"
Declaration of Independence
"Never trouble another for what you can do for yourself."
Thomas Jefferson
"If you put the federal government in charge of the Sahara Desert, in 5 years there'd be a shortage of sand."
Milton Friedman
Reply With Quote
  #23 (permalink)  
Old 12-23-2007, 07:17 AM
Political Mastermind
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: USA
Posts: 1,423
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by satv365 View Post

I got a list of a little over 2,000 forms of direct and indirect taxation in the United States. I fail to see how the income tax on wealthy or poor. Corporation or Private Bussiness amounts to a much needed source of Income for the Government.

You people just want to redistribute wealth to the "poor" in the form of social programs that do not work, nor realy benefit society as whole.
It's not a matter of "helping" anyone in the view from the elitist top of the socialits movement. It's being able to tell morons like the libs in here that they can, by taking from "the rich" give more to them, the poor.

The idear is a simple one: make as many people as possible beholden to the largesse of the government. Only libs can promise more and more to those who are net tax benefit recievers (the poor). Add to this, increasingly onerous taxation on those who actually produce ("the rich") impoverishing many of them, forcing many out of business and thereby making more and more people (their former employees) ever more beholden to gov't just to survive, and you set yourself up quite nicely.

Hey, it worked for the Soviet Union...just look how vibrant and economically solid THEY are today!

Tokie
Reply With Quote
  #24 (permalink)  
Old 12-23-2007, 07:25 AM
satv365's Avatar
Machiavelli Incarnate
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Southern Illinois
Posts: 3,170
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Tokenconservative View Post
It's not a matter of "helping" anyone in the view from the elitist top of the socialits movement. It's being able to tell morons like the libs in here that they can, by taking from "the rich" give more to them, the poor.

The idear is a simple one: make as many people as possible beholden to the largesse of the government. Only libs can promise more and more to those who are net tax benefit recievers (the poor). Add to this, increasingly onerous taxation on those who actually produce ("the rich") impoverishing many of them, forcing many out of business and thereby making more and more people (their former employees) ever more beholden to gov't just to survive, and you set yourself up quite nicely.

Hey, it worked for the Soviet Union...just look how vibrant and economically solid THEY are today!

Tokie
The Soviet Union's economic model could not even produce Consumer goods like toilet paper and tooth paste. Let us not forget about the fact they needed to invade Asia Minor and Eastern Europe to have adequate agricultural and Oil outputs...
__________________
"It is the Right of the People to alter or abolish the Government"
Declaration of Independence
"Never trouble another for what you can do for yourself."
Thomas Jefferson
"If you put the federal government in charge of the Sahara Desert, in 5 years there'd be a shortage of sand."
Milton Friedman
Reply With Quote
  #25 (permalink)  
Old 12-23-2007, 09:59 AM
StormanNorman's Avatar
Machiavelli Incarnate
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 4,952
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Tokenconservative View Post
I love this sort of libbie conflation... right out of the Playbook.

In other comparisons, we can look at this Golden Delicious and see how closely it resembles a Clementine....

You understand that the numbers of people IN the top earning brackets are FAR greater today than they were in 1979 right?

Right?

You do, right?

Hello?

Is this thing on?

Tokie
Hi Tokie,

There is about 40% more people in those top earning brackets in 2003 compared to 1979....and there's about 40% more people in the lower brackets as well...in fact, the 40% number is true for all of the brackets. As the population grows, the brackets grow but stay in the same proportion to one another....that's how percentiles work, Tokie.....comprehend???

For example, in 1979, the top 1% accounted for 922,000 of the returns; the bottom 10% accounted for 9,220,000 of the returns (10 times more than the top 1%....make sense, right Tokie?). In 2003, the top 1% accounted for 1,288,000 returns and the bottom 10% accounted for 12,878,000 returns....same proportions, Tokie, relative to one another.

Your argument that those upper classes are "bigger" than they were in 1979 and that accounts for the larger share of income falls way short mathematically....all the brackets are bigger and bigger by the same proportion.....next.
__________________
The Lone Ranger of the AWE liberal elitists.....who was that masked man???

And now, I'm the Elitist of liberal Elitists...
Reply With Quote
  #26 (permalink)  
Old 12-23-2007, 10:05 AM
StormanNorman's Avatar
Machiavelli Incarnate
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 4,952
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Tokenconservative View Post
Hmm....silence.

I can only take that to mean that no, PulingNorman and his whining, leftist minions in here DON'T understand ...well, purt near anythin' about modern economics.

Thread Closed.

Tokie
Good try, Tokie.....thread reopened...see above.
__________________
The Lone Ranger of the AWE liberal elitists.....who was that masked man???

And now, I'm the Elitist of liberal Elitists...
Reply With Quote
  #27 (permalink)  
Old 12-23-2007, 10:09 AM
StormanNorman's Avatar
Machiavelli Incarnate
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 4,952
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Sam View Post
Nice work SN on the analysis.

Another point to consider is reported income. Do you know how many investing firms assist their clients in avoiding taxes and fabricating losses. Someone with a reported income 0f 600,000/year may actually be earning 15 million/year-that type of wealth is able to access tax shelters. The truly wealthy probably pay far less because the statistics are based on income reported to the IRS.

I know people earning 10x my income who pay far less in taxes then I do.
That's right, Sam....these numbers are strictly based on individual incomes reported to the IRS. I have no idea what the true numbers would look like.
__________________
The Lone Ranger of the AWE liberal elitists.....who was that masked man???

And now, I'm the Elitist of liberal Elitists...
Reply With Quote
  #28 (permalink)  
Old 12-23-2007, 10:10 AM
satv365's Avatar
Machiavelli Incarnate
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Southern Illinois
Posts: 3,170
Default

What are you trying to argue?

Because the rich or upper classes have more money than you, they should pay more % out of there personal income?...


Simply because they make more money than you?


That kind of discourages productivity, and demonizes anyone who gets ahead in society. It tells the people if you don't get a job, or bother to educate yourself, than don't worry! The welfare state will take care of your 7 kids, and give you everything you need...

Seems the antithesis of a free society. Take my money and give it to someone else. Simply because I have more.

It's called Socialism.

Admit it, your socialist.
__________________
"It is the Right of the People to alter or abolish the Government"
Declaration of Independence
"Never trouble another for what you can do for yourself."
Thomas Jefferson
"If you put the federal government in charge of the Sahara Desert, in 5 years there'd be a shortage of sand."
Milton Friedman
Reply With Quote
  #29 (permalink)  
Old 12-23-2007, 10:20 AM
CrankyYankee's Avatar
Machiavelli Incarnate
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Washington State
Posts: 2,714
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by satv365 View Post
What are you trying to argue?

Because the rich or upper classes have more money than you, they should pay more % out of there personal income?...


Simply because they make more money than you?


That kind of discourages productivity, and demonizes anyone who gets ahead in society. It tells the people if you don't get a job, or bother to educate yourself, than don't worry! The welfare state will take care of your 7 kids, and give you everything you need...

Seems the antithesis of a free society. Take my money and give it to someone else. Simply because I have more.

It's called Socialism.

Admit it, your socialist.
I am a socialist....well, at least to a certain degree...

The historical impmentations of socialism in many cases have left much to be desired.

As did Laissez Faire capitalism...

Human nature has many elements, culture determines which elements of human nature are nurtured....

Pure monetary reward is not the only value that can be ascribed to one's life...that is where culture needs to come in and promote something other than materialism.
Reply With Quote
  #30 (permalink)  
Old 12-23-2007, 10:26 AM
satv365's Avatar
Machiavelli Incarnate
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Southern Illinois
Posts: 3,170
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by CrankyYankee View Post
I am a socialist....well, at least to a certain degree...

The historical impmentations of socialism in many cases have left much to be desired.

As did Laissez Faire capitalism...

Human nature has many elements, culture determines which elements of human nature are nurtured....

Pure monetary reward is not the only value that can be ascribed to one's life...that is where culture needs to come in and promote something other than materialism.
As long as we have Monies. Capitalism is the best course to go. Anything else would be Government with too much Control over our daily lives.


So Promote a way to abolish money. Than we can think of a better way...
__________________
"It is the Right of the People to alter or abolish the Government"
Declaration of Independence
"Never trouble another for what you can do for yourself."
Thomas Jefferson
"If you put the federal government in charge of the Sahara Desert, in 5 years there'd be a shortage of sand."
Milton Friedman
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On
Forum Jump


» Navigation

Political Links Page

Blogs by AWE Members

Advertisers support this site - if you're interested in their product, take a look!


test

$5 monthly donation:

$10 monthly donation:



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:13 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.2.0
Poltical Topsites PolitiPoll.net - Political Web Rankings