Is Abortion Unconstitutional?

NITTY · #**851** (**permalink**) 11-05-2006, 02:55 PM

While Abortion Is Infanticide,partial Birth Abortion Is An Abominal Way To Kill A Baby.
Both Are Murder In My Opinion.
Nitty

NITTY · #**852** (**permalink**) 11-05-2006, 03:12 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by mpd8488

The constitutionality of abortion is dependant on whether or not a fetus is considered to be a human being. Now I'm not a biologist, but in the first trimester the fetus is little more than a loosely organized clump of cells. Not a human, so abortion is okay. In the second trimeser it starts to get iffy, but if the fetus still has no thought it is not a human. By the third trimester it is really becoming questionable, but the fetus is still a part of the mother's body, not an independant human being.

It is one of the most morally reprehensible actions that a person can take, but if the fetus isn't a human being, it is not a person and therefore not entitled to life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness.

Just my opinion, if science says otherwise I would rather not remain ignorant.

THE LOOSLEY OGANAZED CLUMP OF CELLS ARE HUMAN CELLS THEY ARE IN THE GROWING PROCESS. IT TAKES 18 TO 21 YEARS BEFORE A LOOSLEY ORGANIZED CLUMP OF CELLS BECOMES AN ADULT PERSON. WE KEEP GROWING NEW CELLS FOR THE NEXT 60 TO 70 YEARS BEFORE WE DIE. IN THE MEAN TIME WE MAY GET FORGETFUL AND OUR THOUGHT PROCESSES DIMINISH UNTILL OUR MINDS GO BACK TO BEING CHILDREN IN THE OLD COUNTRY. DOES THAT MAKE US NOT HUMAN ANYMORE? WE GO BACK TO BEING A CLUMP OF CELLS DEPENDANT ON OTHERS TO CARE FOR US. WE ARE NO LESS HUMAN.
NITTY

PaleRider · #**853** (**permalink**) 11-05-2006, 06:52 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by NITTY

THE LOOSLEY OGANAZED CLUMP OF CELLS ARE HUMAN CELLS THEY ARE IN THE GROWING PROCESS. IT TAKES 18 TO 21 YEARS BEFORE A LOOSLEY ORGANIZED CLUMP OF CELLS BECOMES AN ADULT PERSON. WE KEEP GROWING NEW CELLS FOR THE NEXT 60 TO 70 YEARS BEFORE WE DIE. IN THE MEAN TIME WE MAY GET FORGETFUL AND OUR THOUGHT PROCESSES DIMINISH UNTILL OUR MINDS GO BACK TO BEING CHILDREN IN THE OLD COUNTRY. DOES THAT MAKE US NOT HUMAN ANYMORE? WE GO BACK TO BEING A CLUMP OF CELLS DEPENDANT ON OTHERS TO CARE FOR US. WE ARE NO LESS HUMAN.
NITTY

I keep asking and waiting for one of the pro choicers to provide some credible science that suggests that the offspring of two human beings is ever anything but a human being. I have provided plenty that says that we are human beings from conception.

They see the evidence and then promptly disregard it in favor of their position. One who holds a belief in the face of science that says otherwise can be said to be holding a position of faith. I don't think that they have the right to foist their faith on anyone, especially the 40 million human beings that they have killed already.

jimmyjude · #**854** (**permalink**) 11-05-2006, 10:53 PM

Depends upon the penumbras and emanations.

#**855** (**permalink**) 11-18-2006, 05:58 AM

That part of the Constitution you used actually is what makes it unconstitutional,"all men are created equal with the RIGHT to LIFE,LIBERTY and the pursuit of happiness",abortion takes the 3 most basic rights away,the Supreme Court violated their authority by making it legal,their job is to interpret laws,not make them.

PaleRider · #**856** (**permalink**) 11-19-2006, 06:36 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Thornbird

Areyouforreal...put a big ole flashing light out there man...I flipped on those while I was having my dinner

Oh well...the dog loves ya.

Interesting that the actual consequences of your position sicken you to the point that you would give your dinner to the dog. If that happend to a thinking person, that person might reconsider their position. Bet you aren't rethinking anything are you?