Argue With Everyone Political Forums  

Go Back   Argue With Everyone Political Forums > General Political Debate > The Courts

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #111 (permalink)  
Old 07-19-2006, 07:47 PM
Seasoned Veteran
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 41
Default

Another thing that people are missing is that the documents that form the government of the USA apply to LIVING, breathing human beings, and most of the time - they apply ONLY to citizens. If you haven't been born yet, you are not a citizen...
Reply With Quote
  #112 (permalink)  
Old 07-19-2006, 07:51 PM
Areyouforreal's Avatar
Machiavelli Incarnate
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Cowtown, Texas
Posts: 7,418
Default

People now a days will not accept responsibility for themselves. Today abortion is just another form of birth control like marriage is just another stage of dating. It means nothing to some people.
__________________
People should not be afraid of their governments. Governments should be afraid of their people.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vp92vkXcC0w
Reply With Quote
  #113 (permalink)  
Old 07-19-2006, 08:30 PM
funktacular's Avatar
Political Guru
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Oklahoma
Posts: 833
Default

Another thing that people are missing is that the documents that form the government of the USA apply to LIVING, breathing human beings

This makes no sense because it is alive and it's just in early form of development.

they apply ONLY to citizens. If you haven't been born yet, you are not a citizen...

So your saying I can go out and shoot some illegal mexicans without punishment.
__________________
Whether they are defending the Soviet Union or bleating for Saddam Hussein, liberals are always against America. They are either traitors or idiots, and on the matter of America's self-preservation, the difference is irrelevant. - Ann Coulter

If you were born after 1972 you are a Survivor of the Abortion Holocaust. 1/3 of your generation has been killed by abortion in America!
Reply With Quote
  #114 (permalink)  
Old 07-20-2006, 08:08 AM
PaleRider's Avatar
Machiavelli Incarnate
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 3,797
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Lynus McFeedee
Anything without a brain stem is not human. Up until 4 months, the fetus is not human. You argument makes sense at 4 months...before that, you are simply enslaving women.
Got any credible science to back that up? I can provide plenty that says that the offspring of two human beings is never anything but a human being.
__________________
"It's not alive, It's not alive, It's not alive. Because I said it isnt', there's your proof jerk." ...lexi

"As far as your logical fallicy shit - shove it. I am a woman."...naturemomma
Reply With Quote
  #115 (permalink)  
Old 07-20-2006, 08:11 AM
PaleRider's Avatar
Machiavelli Incarnate
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 3,797
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by PrincessFoamy
Another thing that people are missing is that the documents that form the government of the USA apply to LIVING, breathing human beings, and most of the time - they apply ONLY to citizens. If you haven't been born yet, you are not a citizen...
Try killing a couple of illegals in front of your local law enforcement. You will learn, very quickly, that in this country, you don't need to be a citizen to enjoy the protection of the law.

By the way, unborns respirate. That means that they use oxygen. Just like you.
__________________
"It's not alive, It's not alive, It's not alive. Because I said it isnt', there's your proof jerk." ...lexi

"As far as your logical fallicy shit - shove it. I am a woman."...naturemomma
Reply With Quote
  #116 (permalink)  
Old 07-20-2006, 08:14 AM
PaleRider's Avatar
Machiavelli Incarnate
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 3,797
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Hodgepodge
I appreciate your argument, but the Declaration is not a document of laws. It is a declaration of principles. If we codify the sentiments in the Declaration, it would be law.
The thing is Hodgepodge, it was the law of the land until the Constitution was written. It was duely ratified by the 2nd continental congress and was not, and has not been suspended. Technically, it remains part of the law of the land even today and the law is just a series of technicalities.
__________________
"It's not alive, It's not alive, It's not alive. Because I said it isnt', there's your proof jerk." ...lexi

"As far as your logical fallicy shit - shove it. I am a woman."...naturemomma
Reply With Quote
  #117 (permalink)  
Old 07-21-2006, 02:34 AM
Machiavelli Incarnate
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 13,344
Default

The initial subject of the thread is whether or not abortion is constitutional or not. Not whether it is wrong or not. I suppose that it is constitutional because the court says it is at the moment. But it's constitutionality stems from the 9th ammendment and the right to privacy. I challenge anyone here to find the right to privacy in the 9th ammendment.
Reply With Quote
  #118 (permalink)  
Old 07-21-2006, 02:45 AM
Political Guru
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 903
Default

Better yet, throw out the entire decision. Look at how Roe v Wade is worded. It specifies how Congress can prohibit abortion for each trimester. That is legislation and unconstitutional. Besides, since when was the taking of human life ever protected by the constitution?
__________________
"Those who stand for nothing fall for anything." Alexander Hamilton

The price good men pay for indifference to public affairs is to be ruled by evil men.
Plato
Reply With Quote
  #119 (permalink)  
Old 07-21-2006, 11:40 AM
Hodgepodge's Avatar
Political Guru
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 982
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by PaleRider
The thing is Hodgepodge, it was the law of the land until the Constitution was written. It was duely ratified by the 2nd continental congress and was not, and has not been suspended. Technically, it remains part of the law of the land even today and the law is just a series of technicalities.
Actually, the Articles of Confereration were the supreme law of the land prior to the Constitution's ratification.

And the Declaration specifies no laws. Wanting it to be so does not make it so.
Reply With Quote
  #120 (permalink)  
Old 07-21-2006, 01:54 PM
Machiavelli Incarnate
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 13,344
Default

Since there was no court under the Articles of Confederation it is hard to say that it was the "supreme" law of the land. Rather, the individual states made their own laws which were not dependant on one another.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On
Forum Jump


» Navigation

Political Links Page

Blogs by AWE Members

Advertisers support this site - if you're interested in their product, take a look!


$5 monthly donation:

$10 monthly donation:



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:08 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.2.0