Original 13th Amendment Arguments
Original 13th Amendment Arguments
The “original 13th Amendment” had in fact been ratified
prior to the Civil War by thirteen states, enough for
ratification, and was published in the official copies of the
Constitution for the usA throughout the united states. Over
30 or more official publications from Maine to Colorado
contained the “original 13th Amendment.”
That it suddenly “disappeared” and was replaced with
another 13th Amendment is now a matter of historical and
legal fact. It has been hypothesized that the unrevealed
motive behind the War of 1812 was to delay the ratification
efforts of the sovereign states regarding this “missing”,
original 13th Amendment,” and destroy the records.16
A book published in New Hampshire in 1840 by Joseph Coe
was certified by a special act of Congress, as having the
original Constitution for the usA with the original 13th
Amendment. This copy is prima facie evidence of the
original 13th Amendment having passed.
David Dodge and Brian Marsh have a certified copy of an
un-catalogued book from the archives of the State of
Virginia, also found to have the original, 13th Amendment in
it. Virginia was the 13th state required to ratify the original
13th Amendment. There is also evidence that the issue has
come before the supreme Court at least 4 times. It cannot be
used as precedent because the corporate United States
government has ordered the cases sealed.
This original 13th Amendment can be presented in any court
of law (note as distinguished from code), as a challenge to the legal fraternity who have all accepted a Title of Nobility.
Attorneys-at-Law and Esquire
are Titles of Nobility, thus cannot hold public office, nor are
they Citizens of the United States. If the missing 13th
Amendment were restored, “special interests” and “honors”
would be rendered unconstitutional.
This could compel the entire government to operate under
the same laws as the Citizens are expected to obey. Without
their current individual immunities, government officials
would be unable to abuse common Citizens without fear of
legal liability.
Imagine a government of the people, by the people, and for
the people. Imagine a government truly accountable to the
people, that could not systematically exploit
US Supreme Court:
Therefore, the U.S. citizens residing in one of the states of the union, are classified as property and franchises of the feds as an "individual entity, Wheeling Steel Corp. v. Fox, 298 U.S. 193, 80 L.Ed. 1143, 56 S.Ct. 773
State v. Manuel, 20 NC 122: "the term 'citizen' in the United States, is analogous to the term `subject' in common law; the change of phrase has resulted from the change in government."
US CITIZEN = FEUDAL SUBJECT = SLAVE
LinkBack URL
About LinkBacks
Reply With Quote
Originally Posted by KokomoJoJo
Bookmarks