Ca court overrules voters???

Teak · #**191** (**permalink**) 05-26-2008, 03:10 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by smart makes a comeback

It is off topic,,and perhaps better saved for a seperate thred...,but when I hear people refur to Jefferson as a liberal thinker...it sends chills down my spine. Even for his time, he was reactionary, and was pulled into Liberal thought kicking and screaming

More on topic, to hear a die hard right winger call another a "cronic whiner" lends a whole new meaning to textbook psycho projection

This from the dumbest rock on the pile. Well, assmakesacomeback, your good for laughs, anyway.

areyoushittin'me? · #**192** (**permalink**) 05-26-2008, 03:48 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by bluedog

Well....it certainly was presented in the right FORMAT, being the joke that it is, make believe animation. It should be ingested with all the comprehension in which it was derived, ONE DIMENSIONAL, and a good joke. Personally, I if want to be entertained by Make Believe and find laughter I prefer "Jeff Dunham" and Achmed the dead terrorist a least he presented "three dimensional" animation. BD

(addressing your edit)

Will you be voting for Walter?

My fellow Americans... And any foreigners that know how to read or type on a keyboard. But you can't vote, so don't bother sending me any e-mail. I probably couldn't understand you anyway.

So... AMERICA: As you can tell from this page, I'm running for President. Why? Because the country needs my no-nonsense, straightforward approach to the issues. For example, you have heard the phrase, 'no child left behind.' What? Are you kidding me? You should see my grandkids! If they're acting like a brats, your darn right I'll leave them behind. And with no stinkin' forwarding address! Little MORONS.

It's these kinds of issues that I'll be dealing with for the next few months. Please check back every-so-often. We'll be putting up my blogs and videos. Should be fun, informative, thought-provoking, controversial, and better than a lot of crap on TV.

Have a lovely day.

Sincerely and with much patriotism,
WALTER

smart makes a comeback · #**193** (**permalink**) 05-26-2008, 04:45 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Teak

This from the dumbest rock on the pile. Well, assmakesacomeback, your good for laughs, anyway.

And being the blithering cowardly laughable idiot you are, (Not to mention the chrinic whiner)you fail to come up with a single solitary word to support your disagreement with anything I have said, or anything MULP has schooled you on..

This is predictable...as like most mealey mouth pussy right wing boycunts, your scope is limited to non sustainable 3rd grade school yard insults, as a distraction from the most visable fact,that those you address are your superior in every way, and you have been soundly bitch slapped

Get your GED, a job, a set of balls and stop your whineing.....it is pathetic

Oh,,,and everyone knows...you're not laughing, you are chomipng at the bit like the beaten bitch you are

Teak · #**194** (**permalink**) 05-26-2008, 07:10 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by smart makes a comeback

And being the blithering cowardly laughable idiot you are, (Not to mention the chrinic whiner)you fail to come up with a single solitary word to support your disagreement with anything I have said, or anything MULP has schooled you on..

This is predictable...as like most mealey mouth pussy right wing boycunts, your scope is limited to non sustainable 3rd grade school yard insults, as a distraction from the most visable fact,that those you address are your superior in every way, and you have been soundly bitch slapped

Get your GED, a job, a set of balls and stop your whineing.....it is pathetic

Oh,,,and everyone knows...you're not laughing, you are chomipng at the bit like the beaten bitch you are

Mulp is the whiner, you are the dumb fuck. Doubt you bothered to get your GED when confined, to busy playing hoops. Just look at the shit posted above. If you can't spell, at least learn to use spell check. I'd swear you were trying to mimic NYOB. Now just go visit you parole officer, piss in the bottle, and hope they don't send your sorry ass back to Joliet.

The only reason you're not on the ignore list is because your idiotic remarks are good for laughs. Otherwise they are just juvenile ramblings usually seen on community playgrounds.

mulp · #**195** (**permalink**) 05-26-2008, 07:19 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Teak

Mulp, you ain't no Socrates, Jefferson, Madison, or Adams and to even try comparing yourself to any of them points out what an inflated ego you have. In all the claptrap you have posted you have done nothing but whine about conditions. I'm willing to bet that is how you have led your entire life, never contributing one thing positive to any aspict of it.

So, why do you feel in necessary to engage in an ad hominem argument, instead of explaining why government should proscribe some relationships between couples? Why should government impose the views of corporations led by people seeking to impose their will on minority individuals?

Why should any citizen settle for any discrimination against any minority, no matter how few, and no matter how baffling that minority is to them?

Why should government, we the people, impose a view of nature that is clearly not a true view of nature?

How can the government view the mutually beneficial relationship which impinges on no one else as a threat to anyone else and thus seek to suppress it and them?

Of course, those same individuals seem to have little reservation about acting with violence toward others they don't understand, and who these people refuse to even superficially try to understand?

I make no claim to be Socrates, in either stature or importance, but he serves, as do others, as a role model.

Who are your role models? Bush? Cheney? Rove? Reagan? Nixon? Clinton? Carter? LBJ? Delay? Will you claim that you will be the person you use as a role model? Perhaps your role model are the Athenians who condemned Socrates, and then erected statues honoring him as if he were the hero he suggested they should regard him as?

areyoushittin'me? · #**196** (**permalink**) 05-26-2008, 08:12 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Teak

I'm willing to bet that is how you have led your entire life, never contributing one thing positive to any aspict of it.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Teak

If you can't spell, at least learn to use spell check. I'd swear you were trying to mimic NYOB.

Do tell, what aspict of his spelling bothers you most?

Teak · #**197** (**permalink**) 05-26-2008, 08:39 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by mulp

So, why do you feel in necessary to engage in an ad hominem argument, instead of explaining why government should proscribe some relationships between couples? Why should government impose the views of corporations led by people seeking to impose their will on minority individuals?

Why should any citizen settle for any discrimination against any minority, no matter how few, and no matter how baffling that minority is to them?

Why should government, we the people, impose a view of nature that is clearly not a true view of nature?

How can the government view the mutually beneficial relationship which impinges on no one else as a threat to anyone else and thus seek to suppress it and them?

Of course, those same individuals seem to have little reservation about acting with violence toward others they don't understand, and who these people refuse to even superficially try to understand?

I make no claim to be Socrates, in either stature or importance, but he serves, as do others, as a role model.

Who are your role models? Bush? Cheney? Rove? Reagan? Nixon? Clinton? Carter? LBJ? Delay? Will you claim that you will be the person you use as a role model? Perhaps your role model are the Athenians who condemned Socrates, and then erected statues honoring him as if he were the hero he suggested they should regard him as?

The only role models I ever had, or needed, were my parents. Who taught me the value of a dollar, a strong work ethic, to accept responsibility for my actions, and to rely upon no one to cover for my poor life choices. It's a real shame that such principles have been lost to such a large portion of our population. But that is solely the fault of the socialist tide swamping this country.

Thank God I will not live to see this countries demise should the socialist party win out.

smart makes a comeback · #**198** (**permalink**) 05-26-2008, 08:53 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by mulp

So, why do you feel in necessary to engage in an ad hominem argument, instead of explaining why government should proscribe some relationships between couples? Why should government impose the views of corporations led by people seeking to impose their will on minority individuals?

Why should any citizen settle for any discrimination against any minority, no matter how few, and no matter how baffling that minority is to them?

Why should government, we the people, impose a view of nature that is clearly not a true view of nature?

How can the government view the mutually beneficial relationship which impinges on no one else as a threat to anyone else and thus seek to suppress it and them?

Of course, those same individuals seem to have little reservation about acting with violence toward others they don't understand, and who these people refuse to even superficially try to understand?

I make no claim to be Socrates, in either stature or importance, but he serves, as do others, as a role model.

Who are your role models? Bush? Cheney? Rove? Reagan? Nixon? Clinton? Carter? LBJ? Delay? Will you claim that you will be the person you use as a role model? Perhaps your role model are the Athenians who condemned Socrates, and then erected statues honoring him as if he were the hero he suggested they should regard him as?

He feels it necessary to engage in an ad hominem argument, becduase there is no REAL arguenet to support his homophobia, bigotry, ignorance, and distaste for all tyhat America stands nfor.
He pines for some neo facist dictatotrship of Cynicism, hate, prejudice and voluntary ignorance

The fact is, there is no argument for opposing equal protection under the law, that is not patently anti American, and “Teak” is the classic bitter whining neo fascist anti American

Which is why due to circumstances beyond his control....he is officially shit canned

Quote:

Today 07:39 PM
Teak This user is on your Ignore List.

Cordelier · #**199** (**permalink**) 05-27-2008, 12:49 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Teak

Since marriage is not even mentioned in the U.S. Constitution, its clealy a state issue. To be decided by each state as they deem appropriate.

Donesn't each have a 14th Amendment obligation to give each citizen equal treatment under the law, though? If legal recognition of marriage is a right freely given to straight couples, then what Constitutional right does the state have to discriminate against gay couples?

Also, doesn't the 9th Amendment state that rights don't have to be explicitly mentioned within the Constitution to exist?