 |
|
05-19-2008, 03:23 PM
|
|
Machiavelli Incarnate
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 15,306
|
|
Jeebus!
Supreme Court, Mr. Amerika!
|
05-19-2008, 03:24 PM
|
|
Machiavelli Incarnate
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: chapmanville, wv
Posts: 4,829
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Teak
This whole thread has been about the state of California and actions taken by the State Supream Court. Yeah, a few fools keep referencing the federal constitution, and the federal supream court, but like I said it's all about the state of California.
|
And what right does the Sate Court have in overturning the will of the people? As I said, there are no "humanitarian" concerns, and civil unions very well cover any and all legal advantages that marriage offers. The people have spoken. And indeed it will be a Federal Case if there is an appeal. As the "court" does not possess the inherent right to "opine new law" form the bench and that indeed is what happened, as they try to "redefine" marriage by Court Order, for that indeed is a Federal concern, and a breech of the US Constitution, as marriage is not. BD
Last edited by bluedog; 05-19-2008 at 03:28 PM.
|
05-19-2008, 03:28 PM
|
|
Machiavelli Incarnate
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 15,306
|
|
It's just like legislation preventing interracial marriage, or any other civil-rights issue.
Mob rule is often unconstitutional.
|
05-19-2008, 03:31 PM
|
|
Machiavelli Incarnate
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 15,306
|
|
Really, you people shouldn't let Wowsa wind ya'll up so...
He's just a Troll, afterall.
|
05-19-2008, 03:39 PM
|
 |
Machiavelli Incarnate
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Malibu, CA
Posts: 3,648
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by bluedog
And what right does the Sate Court have in overturning the will of the people? As I said, there are no "humanitarian" concerns, and civil unions very well cover any and all legal advantages that marriage offers. The people have spoken. And indeed it will be a Federal Case if there is an appeal. As the "court" does not possess the inherent right to "opine new law" form the bench and that indeed is what happened, as they try to "redefine" marriage by Court Order, for that indeed is a Federal concern, and a breech of the US Constitution, as marriage is not. BD
|
The state supream court overturned a law that was contrary to the state constitution. They did their job. Now if the people really want to follow up on this they can try to place a measure to ammend the constitution on the Nov ballot. Only this time they should insure it a properly written.
__________________
If you want change stop electing "liberal: democrats and "radical" Republicans. Find and support true Conservatives; those who believe in fiscal responsibilities, individual accountability, and a smaller government, with less control of your daily life.
|
05-19-2008, 03:41 PM
|
|
Machiavelli Incarnate
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 15,306
|
|
"this time they should insure it a properly written."
|
05-19-2008, 03:53 PM
|
|
Machiavelli Incarnate
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Malibu, CA
Posts: 3,648
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by A. Crowley
"this time they should insure it a properly written."
|
Yes professor. You don't like it, get fucked. I'm not out for a grade from some worthless professional student.
__________________
If you want change stop electing "liberal: democrats and "radical" Republicans. Find and support true Conservatives; those who believe in fiscal responsibilities, individual accountability, and a smaller government, with less control of your daily life.
|
05-19-2008, 03:56 PM
|
|
Machiavelli Incarnate
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 15,306
|
|
Maybe we can get alberto Gonzales to rate your ass, Tweaky!
|
05-19-2008, 04:00 PM
|
|
Machiavelli Incarnate
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Malibu, CA
Posts: 3,648
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by A. Crowley
Maybe we can get alberto Gonzales to rate your ass, Tweaky!
|
Who's "we"  ? Got a mouse in your pocket?
__________________
If you want change stop electing "liberal: democrats and "radical" Republicans. Find and support true Conservatives; those who believe in fiscal responsibilities, individual accountability, and a smaller government, with less control of your daily life.
|
05-19-2008, 04:06 PM
|
|
Machiavelli Incarnate
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 15,306
|
|
"Who're "we" ? Got a mouse in your pocket?"
Fixed that for ya, tweaky!
"Crotch-Rot Susie" and I will see if we can track the fool down for ya.
|
| Thread Tools |
|
|
| Display Modes |
 Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
|
