Poor little Carson. Other jail inmates been pounding your ass a little hard?
Maybe you should complain to the Sheriff. HA HA HA HA

__________________
If you want change stop electing "liberal: democrats and "radical" Republicans. Find and support true Conservatives; those who believe in fiscal responsibilities, individual accountability, and a smaller government, with less control of your daily life.

Trying to keep-up with Retards can be interesting; but certainly not enough to research the thread for evidence of intelligence or intent.

What do you Rightard Whackjobs propose for gays, anyway?

How many times will you repeat yourselves?

Keep living in that fantasy world faggot and try not to lose an eye to all those hard ons you face.

__________________
You can never dent spiderwebs

"Bitch you don't ever quote at all. I don't think you know how"


-Cletus

Well your gay, how do you feel about it?

__________________
You can never dent spiderwebs

"Well your gay, how do you feel about it?"

Like I said pages ago, let them marry and content with all the aspects of marriage and divorce that hetrosexuals have to contend with. They are not asking for anything more than that.

__________________
If you want change stop electing "liberal: democrats and "radical" Republicans. Find and support true Conservatives; those who believe in fiscal responsibilities, individual accountability, and a smaller government, with less control of your daily life.

There ya go, Teak.

Why not drop it now, or extrapolate your new-found sense of Liberty?

I for one do not care how any rights are "obtained" as long as the same process is followed that was mandated by the constitution. And according to the constitution....the states and only the states have the right to define "legal" marriage, for it is sure is not mentioned in the constitution, and trying to declare sexual preference as a human right under any current amendment is a superfluous endeavor. For indeed no one needs to engage in the act of sex to continue one's life existence. And it cannot be considered racist due to the fact that homosexuality is not based upon any one culture nor race. And in consideration of "human rights" and race relations anyone that wants to "privately" engage in any legal activity they wish such as homosexual activity, they do not suffer in the least from racism nor lack of humanity concerns as they have "exactly" the same rights any other HUMAN has. Thus, unless they can lobby their individual states for the special right to engage in marriage and have it "redefined", they have no claim to any federal consideration as certainly "civil unions" would accomplish any legal cure for tax deduction or etc... Thus, I see no reason whatsoever to completely ignore the 10th Article of our Bill of Rights in the relief of federally mandated power. The constitution did not concern itself with marriage...why should the Federal Court system? What, are the States not capable of defining the will of its citizens in the form of elections? Or must "Big Brother" Government step in tell us exactly what we want? BD

This whole thread has been about the state of California and actions taken by the State Supream Court. Yeah, a few fools keep referencing the federal constitution, and the federal supream court, but like I said it's all about the state of California.

But there will have to be some federal adjustsments madeto the tax code.

__________________
If you want change stop electing "liberal: democrats and "radical" Republicans. Find and support true Conservatives; those who believe in fiscal responsibilities, individual accountability, and a smaller government, with less control of your daily life.