Argue With Everyone Political Forums  

Go Back   Argue With Everyone Political Forums > General Political Debate > The Courts

test
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #21 (permalink)  
Old 06-01-2008, 01:12 PM
Machiavelli Incarnate
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 7,474
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by NAT View Post
Source please.
Just like a liberal piece of shit...expecting someone else to do their research for them.
__________________
GOD BLESS AMERICA
Reply With Quote
  #22 (permalink)  
Old 06-01-2008, 01:13 PM
Machiavelli Incarnate
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 7,474
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by mulp View Post
So we should have the right to monitor your sex life to insure you perform your sexual duties within the framework defined by Catholic priests and the likes of Rev Fawell and President Clinton?
No. I didn't say that.

But don't the liberal scum try to legislate morality?
__________________
GOD BLESS AMERICA
Reply With Quote
  #23 (permalink)  
Old 06-01-2008, 06:46 PM
mulp's Avatar
Machiavelli Incarnate
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Merrimack, NH
Posts: 3,854
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by fenianforever1689 View Post
No. I didn't say that.

But don't the liberal scum try to legislate morality?
Well, there is no right to privacy in the Constitution according to you, so you must agree with Bush that the government needs to monitor the people to root out terrorist activity, and I can tell that what two people of the same sex might be doing terrifies you, and the idea that you are procreating and raising an offspring terrifies me.

And we liberals have no interest in telling you who or what to have sex with, or what you smoke or cook up in your lab, although I think the fallout from what you do and the cost to society justifies taxes whatever it is you do.

I want NH to be a mecca for gay marriage so gays flock to NH and spend a lot of money here on weddings. But if you aren't gay, then come here and benefit from the creativity in marriages the the NH gay community would provide. You see, the reason NH is asking for a stay in California's start is to let NH get a better start on the business - too many conservatives are interfering with business opportunity.

Where is the old NH that saw sin as a source of tax revenue instead of something to futilely attempt to prohibit...
Reply With Quote
  #24 (permalink)  
Old 06-01-2008, 07:44 PM
NAT's Avatar
NAT NAT is offline
Political Junkie
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 292
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by fenianforever1689 View Post
Just like a liberal piece of shit...expecting someone else to do their research for them.
You made the premise, you supply the info.

That's how every other forum I've been posting to for almost two decades operates.

No proof, no validity, no credibility.

So noted.
__________________
Stupid people are like a Slinky...
Pretty damn useless, but a ball to push down stairs.
Reply With Quote
  #25 (permalink)  
Old 06-01-2008, 08:06 PM
mulp's Avatar
Machiavelli Incarnate
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Merrimack, NH
Posts: 3,854
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by NAT View Post
You made the premise, you supply the info.

That's how every other forum I've been posting to for almost two decades operates.

No proof, no validity, no credibility.

So noted.
Unfair!!! No conservative should be required to prove his facts are based in reality when reality contradicts conservative ideology. Besides, if Rush Limbaugh said it, it is absolute true fact.
Reply With Quote
  #26 (permalink)  
Old 06-02-2008, 10:56 AM
Machiavelli Incarnate
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 7,474
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by mulp View Post
Well, there is no right to privacy in the Constitution according to you, so you must agree with Bush that the government needs to monitor the people to root out terrorist activity, and I can tell that what two people of the same sex might be doing terrifies you, and the idea that you are procreating and raising an offspring terrifies me.

You are racing catshit to the finish line of outrageous fallacious arguments.


Quote:
And we liberals have no interest in telling you who or what to have sex with, or what you smoke or cook up in your lab, although I think the fallout from what you do and the cost to society justifies taxes whatever it is you do.
You say that libbies don't have any interest in telling people who to have sex with?

Except of course polygamists, right?

But, that aside, that would be the ONLY thing that liberals don't want to tell people how to do.
__________________
GOD BLESS AMERICA
Reply With Quote
  #27 (permalink)  
Old 06-02-2008, 10:58 AM
Machiavelli Incarnate
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 7,474
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by NAT View Post
You made the premise, you supply the info.

That's how every other forum I've been posting to for almost two decades operates.

No proof, no validity, no credibility.

So noted.
Moron. So noted. Not that noting was needed.
__________________
GOD BLESS AMERICA
Reply With Quote
  #28 (permalink)  
Old 06-02-2008, 10:59 AM
Machiavelli Incarnate
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 7,474
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by mulp View Post
Unfair!!! No conservative should be required to prove his facts are based in reality when reality contradicts conservative ideology. Besides, if Rush Limbaugh said it, it is absolute true fact.
Yes. All conservatives bow at the altar of Limbaugh.
__________________
GOD BLESS AMERICA
Reply With Quote
  #29 (permalink)  
Old 09-12-2008, 02:20 PM
Machiavelli Incarnate
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 7,474
Default

fucking stupid liberals are too lazy to look into the decision or the mental state of Hugo Black.
__________________
GOD BLESS AMERICA
Reply With Quote
  #30 (permalink)  
Old 09-12-2008, 02:28 PM
Political Guru
 
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 919
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by fenianforever1689 View Post
will, eventually, cause the Roe decision to be overturned.


How many people even know who wade was?

How many people know that the majority was written by a crazy man?
Bam, without even going to the googlemobile I can tell you that Wade was a Texas county, not a person.

And whoever wrote the majority decision, 4 other judges agreed, some of them Reagan appointees.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On
Forum Jump


» Navigation

Political Links Page

Blogs by AWE Members

Advertisers support this site - if you're interested in their product, take a look!


test

$5 monthly donation:

$10 monthly donation:



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:15 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.2.0
Poltical Topsites PolitiPoll.net - Political Web Rankings