Argue With Everyone Political Forums  

Go Back   Argue With Everyone Political Forums > General Political Debate > The Courts
Register Blogs FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #21 (permalink)  
Old 04-20-2008, 02:14 PM
Chef's Avatar
Political Guru
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: USA
Posts: 599
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by dab11999 View Post
I don't think military members are above the law. I, personally, don't have much love for dogs. But, if they mean that much to him, why not spend the money and put them in a real kennel?
lets see most kennels cost $50 a day (the ones that walk the dogs and play with them) Not the ones that just stick them in a cage.

well take the $50 x at least 365 = $18,250 per dog.
__________________


http://www.marines.com/page/Home.jsp?forceHtml=true

Vote or shut up
Save energy Turn your Lights OFF!
Gun Contol is as simple as hitting your target!

http://www.water4gas.com/2books.htm

Spell check cost extra so deal with it.
Reply With Quote
  #22 (permalink)  
Old 04-20-2008, 05:43 PM
ForReal's Avatar
Seasoned Veteran
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 30
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by nathanbforrest45 View Post
Well, there are discounts given to members of the military that are not given to civilians so there is precedent. Also why not have a military ombudsman help find a family that would keep the dog until December. There are other ways around this that would not include giving special dispensation to someone and then having everyone demanding the same.
Yes, one would think the military would have some avenue of recourse for our fighting troops, maybe even the local humane society could "foster care" his dogs. Then again, maybe the soldier could resolve his own problem by allowing someone else to care for his dogs. Is it really "our" problem?
__________________
No State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.
Reply With Quote
  #23 (permalink)  
Old 04-20-2008, 07:32 PM
rob's Avatar
rob rob is offline
Machiavelli Incarnate
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: SW Oklahoma
Posts: 13,582
Blog Entries: 1
Send a message via MSN to rob
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ForReal View Post
Yes, one would think the military would have some avenue of recourse for our fighting troops, maybe even the local humane society could "foster care" his dogs. Then again, maybe the soldier could resolve his own problem by allowing someone else to care for his dogs. Is it really "our" problem?
That is what the soldier was trying to do by having his father take care of his dogs.
__________________
An informed voter scares the Goverment lackeys.

An American first and always a Conservative.
Reply With Quote
  #24 (permalink)  
Old 04-20-2008, 08:08 PM
ForReal's Avatar
Seasoned Veteran
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 30
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ForReal View Post
Yes, one would think the military would have some avenue of recourse for our fighting troops, maybe even the local humane society could "foster care" his dogs. Then again, maybe the soldier could resolve his own problem by allowing someone else to care for his dogs. Is it really "our" problem?
Quote:
Originally Posted by rob View Post
That is what the soldier was trying to do by having his father take care of his dogs.
I mean that the soldier should have someone other than his father who has his own dogs care for his dogs since the addition puts his father over the legal limit the city allows.
__________________
No State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.
Reply With Quote
  #25 (permalink)  
Old 04-20-2008, 11:16 PM
NAT's Avatar
NAT NAT is offline
Political Junkie
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 292
Default

ForReal, what if the father is the only recourse the young man could take?
Reply With Quote
  #26 (permalink)  
Old 04-21-2008, 08:23 AM
ForReal's Avatar
Seasoned Veteran
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 30
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by NAT View Post
ForReal, what if the father is the only recourse the young man could take?
Well, the city has advised the soldier's father he is breaking the law by having too many dogs, so now he has the problem of finding some alternative recourse.
__________________
No State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.
Reply With Quote
  #27 (permalink)  
Old 04-21-2008, 09:58 AM
Noibn's Avatar
Political Junkie
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 276
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by TakuanSoho View Post
Thank you, I think..... :-)

Though surprisingly well adjusted to those who knew me then!
Although, on the inside, they are shaking their heads in disbelief.

Reply With Quote
  #28 (permalink)  
Old 04-22-2008, 10:33 AM
Uncensored2008's Avatar
Political Mastermind
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 1,483
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by TakuanSoho View Post
You know I completely agree with your position, however I think in this instance the local government could have a military family member shelter provision.

But that would be an exception, otherwise I completely agree with you.
Essentially they wave the fee for the kennel license and be done with it. Identify the number of animals and document the care giver.

I wonder how much the fee for the license is? Is this being hyped over a $250 license?
__________________
Democrats have worked hard to ensure that Americans pay as much for gas as Europeans do. After a quarter-century of gas tax hikes, a ban on drilling for oil and a complete destruction of the nuclear power industry in America, I guess liberals can declare: Mission accomplished!
Ann Coulter
Reply With Quote
  #29 (permalink)  
Old 04-22-2008, 10:39 AM
Machiavelli Incarnate
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 3,057
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Noibn View Post
Although, on the inside, they are shaking their heads in disbelief.

It hurts, only because it is sooooo true.
Reply With Quote
  #30 (permalink)  
Old 04-22-2008, 10:41 AM
Machiavelli Incarnate
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 3,057
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Uncensored2008 View Post
Essentially they wave the fee for the kennel license and be done with it. Identify the number of animals and document the care giver.

I wonder how much the fee for the license is? Is this being hyped over a $250 license?
I am sure that running a kennel involves some sort of course and test, as well as having certain items at the house to ensure the humane treatment of the animals (probably cages, ect ect).

Just guessing because I really don't care, but in that nearly every other license requires some sort of certification, particularly when it involves a business (as kennels generally are), I would be surprised if it were as easy as a mere charge.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



» Navigation
Political Links Page

Blogs by AWE Members

Advertisers support this site - if you're interested in their product, take a look!




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:20 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
LinkBacks Enabled by vBSEO 3.1.0
Poltical Topsites PolitiPoll.net - Political Web Rankings