Argue With Everyone Political Forums  

Go Back   Argue With Everyone Political Forums > General Political Debate > The Courts
Register Blogs FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 03-30-2008, 04:00 PM
mulp's Avatar
Machiavelli Incarnate
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Merrimack, NH
Posts: 2,515
Default Will Hillary or Obama have right to imprison you?

According to John McCain, citing Supreme Court rulings from the US Supreme Court in cases against the Bush administration, a president Obama or President Hillary Clinton will have the unitary authority to deem any American citizen a threat and order them imprisoned without any access to US Courts.

Do you believe that the US Supreme Court was correct in its ruling, and is John McCain correct in his interpretation of the US Supreme Court decisions?

If President Obama or President Clinton orders you to be swept up, sent to a secret location, and then tortured, as President Bush argues is the right of the US president, will you confess to being a terrorist, or will you claim that you are being held contrary to your rights?

If you are being held contrary to your rights, which rights are you claiming?

Certainly you would not claim the US Constitution gives you rights, unless you believe the conservative, strict constructionist, non-judicial activist, justices are wrong, and the liberal justices are correct.
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 03-30-2008, 05:16 PM
rob's Avatar
rob rob is offline
Machiavelli Incarnate
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: SW Oklahoma
Posts: 13,606
Blog Entries: 1
Send a message via MSN to rob
Default

Can you provide a link to this statement by McCain?
__________________
An informed voter scares the Goverment lackeys.

An American first and always a Conservative.
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 03-30-2008, 08:08 PM
mulp's Avatar
Machiavelli Incarnate
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Merrimack, NH
Posts: 2,515
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by rob View Post
Can you provide a link to this statement by McCain?
It is mentioned in this episode; it doesn't have him actually saying it, but someone who asked questions of all three of the current candidates, McCain, Clinton, Obama.

This American Life

The podcast won't be available for a week, and the website doesn't provide much detail on who was featured, and I was shopping for food when the statement was made so I wasn't focused on taking notes.

Quote:
353: The Audacity of Government

We've noticed a trend in a number of actions taken lately by the United States government. Tiny things, things you probably haven't heard of, but with big implications. Harassing widows. Defying a century-old and utterly benign treaty—with Canada! So we've decided to spend an hour admitting and talking about the fact that everyone knows is true: America's become a jerk.

And yes, the always-illuminating Jack Hitt will do some of this talking.

In any case, you should not be surprised that Bush has claimed he can do this and that the
US Supreme Court has said that he can, and it makes sense that McCain would say that the US Supreme Court has said that he would be able to hold any US citizen without the courts having any say. If he didn't say that, he would be attacked by the conservatives for being weak and anti-American.
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 03-31-2008, 05:46 PM
Yellowjacket's Avatar
Political Junkie
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Ohio
Posts: 173
Default

More important than a link to McCain's alleged statement, could you cite the supreme court decision affirming this power?

Quote:
Certainly you would not claim the US Constitution gives you rights, unless you believe the conservative, strict constructionist, non-judicial activist, justices are wrong, and the liberal justices are correct.
The Constitution does not "give" you any rights, it merely affirms pre-existing rights and protects them.
Quote:
"You have rights antecedent to all earthly governments; rights that cannot be repealed or restrained by human laws; right derived from the Great Legislator of the Universe."
-- John Adams
Quote:
"The whole of the Bill (of Rights) is a declaration of the right of the people at large or considered as individuals .... It establishes some rights of the individual as unalienable and which consequently, no majority has a right to deprive them of."
-- Albert Gallatin, New York Historical Society, October 7, 1789
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old 04-02-2008, 01:12 AM
mulp's Avatar
Machiavelli Incarnate
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Merrimack, NH
Posts: 2,515
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Yellowjacket View Post
More important than a link to McCain's alleged statement, could you cite the supreme court decision affirming this power?
I don't recall what McCain cited, but how about
Hamdi v. Rumsfeld
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old 04-02-2008, 07:48 AM
wow's Avatar
wow wow is offline
Machiavelli Incarnate
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: TEXAS
Posts: 4,559
Default

mulp,

If President Obama or President Clinton orders you to be swept up, sent to a secret location, and then tortured, as President Bush argues is the right of the US president, will you confess to being a terrorist, or will you claim that you are being held contrary to your rights?

I would think if Obama or Clinton were President and had a Republican Congress that was trying to prevent the FBI/CIA from gathering intelligence to prevent a terror attack, their supporters would want them to have these powers.
This is what you get when you gamble with the lives of innocent Americans for political gain.
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old 04-02-2008, 09:18 AM
Machiavelli Incarnate
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 12,508
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by mulp View Post
It is mentioned in this episode; it doesn't have him actually saying it, but someone who asked questions of all three of the current candidates, McCain, Clinton, Obama.

This American Life

The podcast won't be available for a week, and the website doesn't provide much detail on who was featured, and I was shopping for food when the statement was made so I wasn't focused on taking notes.


In any case, you should not be surprised that Bush has claimed he can do this and that the
US Supreme Court has said that he can, and it makes sense that McCain would say that the US Supreme Court has said that he would be able to hold any US citizen without the courts having any say. If he didn't say that, he would be attacked by the conservatives for being weak and anti-American.
Why are you making accusations and then not offereing anything at all to support them?

Which Supreme Court cases said this? Because the one below doesn't say this at all.

Quote:
Originally Posted by mulp View Post
I don't recall what McCain cited, but how about
Hamdi v. Rumsfeld
The US government lost this case, so again, what case was it that McCain cited?

Lets see here, you can't come up with anything that says McCain actually said this and you can't come up with any Supreme Court case which says this either. Why should anyone believe you?
Reply With Quote
  #8 (permalink)  
Old 04-02-2008, 09:27 AM
Seasoned Veteran
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: In liberal's nightmares
Posts: 62
Default

mulp is full of it.

McCain never said it, the US SC court never ruled it.

Typical liberal misinformation trying to demonize their opponents with lies.
__________________
Great spirits have always encountered violent opposition from mediocre minds - Einstein
Reply With Quote
  #9 (permalink)  
Old 04-02-2008, 12:20 PM
Machiavelli Incarnate
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 2,842
Default

Probably they will, but only if we don't swear allegiance to the party...like in Ohio.
Reply With Quote
  #10 (permalink)  
Old 04-02-2008, 12:36 PM
wvpeach's Avatar
Machiavelli Incarnate
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: West Virginia ( Gods Country)
Posts: 4,435
Default

Certainly any president now has the right to imprison anybody with out charges . Bush saw to that.

All they have to do is say you are suspected of terrorism.

And who defines terrorism? the president of course.

You could be guilty of terrorism economically because you advocate more regulation on business . which Bush deems as a terrorist act against the economy.

Presidents that follow Bush will have the same powers.
__________________
Real Christians Don't Support Preemptive War



Life is not about counting the number of breaths you take , life is about the moments that take your breath away.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



» Navigation
Political Links Page

Blogs by AWE Members

Advertisers support this site - if you're interested in their product, take a look!




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:27 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
LinkBacks Enabled by vBSEO 3.1.0
Poltical Topsites PolitiPoll.net - Political Web Rankings