 |
|
04-11-2008, 11:54 AM
|
 |
Machiavelli Incarnate
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 4,516
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by A. Crowley
"All you have to do is replace Vietnam with the word "Iraq" and we have the same lies being repeated today."
|
In fact the Iraqi crowd did just that, dragged out all the old bullshit and replaced "Vietnam" with Iraq.
For the most part the protestors are the same people - they never grew up.
But those hippie chicks aren't so enticing braless and topless anymore. They trip and skin their knees, and scrape their nipples at the same time... |
04-11-2008, 12:38 PM
|
 |
Machiavelli Incarnate
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Omaha, which is why Dave won't come here
Posts: 3,906
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by A. Crowley
"All you have to do is replace Vietnam with the word "Iraq" and we have the same lies being repeated today."
|
...and what dumbfucks like this have never noticed is that we haven't "lost" a Battle on the field since Korea. |
04-11-2008, 12:43 PM
|
|
Political Guru
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 733
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Amazed
...and what dumbfucks like this have never noticed is that we haven't "lost" a Battle on the field since Korea.
|
Another popular rightard myth commonly squawked. One of the worst was ... can't remember then name in Vietnam, the one after the one shown in We Were Soldiers ....
And irrelevant if true. The Brits "won" most of the battles in our revolution. Winning the war is what counts. |
04-11-2008, 02:01 PM
|
|
Machiavelli Incarnate
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Omaha, which is why Dave won't come here
Posts: 3,906
|
|
Another popular rightard myth commonly squawked. One of the worst was ... can't remember then name in Vietnam, the one after the one shown in We Were Soldiers ....
And irrelevant if true. The Brits "won" most of the battles in our revolution. Winning the war is what counts.
LMAO...we didn't "lose" it, Nixon gave in to the dumbfucks like you and walked away from it, causing MILLIONS to lose their lives communists just like you, and it is absolutely true...you just hate the American Military.(BTW, you are trying to repeat this scenario in Iraq)
|
04-11-2008, 02:09 PM
|
|
Political Guru
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 733
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Amazed
Another popular rightard myth commonly squawked. One of the worst was ... can't remember then name in Vietnam, the one after the one shown in We Were Soldiers ....
And irrelevant if true. The Brits "won" most of the battles in our revolution. Winning the war is what counts.
LMAO...we didn't "lose" it, Nixon gave in to the dumbfucks like you and walked away from it, causing MILLIONS to lose their lives communists just like you, and it is absolutely true...you just hate the American Military.(BTW, you are trying to repeat this scenario in Iraq)
|
Leaving out how quickly you abandoned the rightard stupidity of never losing a battle, as you pretend to address it while switching subjects ...
We'll move on to the rest of your semi-literate rant. Hitler became popular partly on a similar appeal to the simple-minded, brain-dead chauvinists. He said Germany didn't really lose WWI; the November Criminals cheated. I reacted the same way, when the Suns lost to the Spurs last year. Trouble is history disagrees.
|
04-11-2008, 02:40 PM
|
|
Machiavelli Incarnate
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Omaha, which is why Dave won't come here
Posts: 3,906
|
|
Leaving out how quickly you abandoned the rightard stupidity of never losing a battle, as you pretend to address it while switching subjects ...
We'll move on to the rest of your semi-literate rant. Hitler became popular partly on a similar appeal to the simple-minded, brain-dead chauvinists. He said Germany didn't really lose WWI; the November Criminals cheated. I reacted the same way, when the Suns lost to the Spurs last year. Trouble is history disagrees.
(smile) Translation:" Nuh-uh, and I choose ONLY to believe myself."
We haven't lost on the Battlefield since Korea...History doesn't "disagree" at all, you do. You also choose to ignore the fact that you wish to follow the same track in Iraq, and don't care that "History" will indeed repeat itself there if we give in and run..as you Lefty's advocate. Do you actually believe insults to be "debate"?
|
04-11-2008, 02:48 PM
|
|
Machiavelli Incarnate
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 4,516
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Amazed
LMAO...we didn't "lose" it, Nixon gave in to the dumbfucks like you and walked away from it, causing MILLIONS to lose their lives communists just like you, and it is absolutely true...you just hate the American Military.(BTW, you are trying to repeat this scenario in Iraq)
|
We did lose the Vietnam war. We just didn't lose it to the NVA, we lost to the 5th column of people like Bonzo. |
04-11-2008, 02:49 PM
|
|
Political Guru
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 733
|
|
aDazed:
Quote:
|
(smile) Translation:" Nuh-uh, and I choose ONLY to believe myself."
|
Translation: "I'm such a twit I think repeatedly using the lame "translation" bit is witty.
Quote:
|
We haven't lost on the Battlefield since Korea...History doesn't "disagree" at all, you do.
|
I pointed to one where we did. Rather than dispute it, you simply re-squawked.
Quote:
|
You also choose to ignore the fact that you wish to follow the same track in Iraq, and don't care that "History" will indeed repeat itself
|
One of the first things a History student learns is that history never repeats itself. Rightard parrots, OTOH, would be mute were cliches prohibitted.
Quote:
|
there if we give in and run..as you Lefty's advocate. Do you actually believe insults to be "debate"?
|
Frankly, I figured at least one of you whiney rightards would catch on to the fact that whimpering about insults as you sling your own limp-wristed versions goes beyond irony. It not only makes you look stupid and hypocritical; it makes you look like a whiney wimp, also.
|
04-11-2008, 02:52 PM
|
|
Political Guru
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 733
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Uncensored2008
We did lose the Vietnam war. We just didn't lose it to the NVA, we lost to the 5th column of people like Bonzo.
|
Yeah, yeah. Democracy's a pain in the ass. Silly people won't goose step and all our good wars get ruined. America would be a great country, if it weren't for all them damned Americans. |
04-11-2008, 03:25 PM
|
 |
Machiavelli Incarnate
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: The Republic of Texas
Posts: 7,113
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by mulp
According to John McCain, citing Supreme Court rulings from the US Supreme Court in cases against the Bush administration, a president Obama or President Hillary Clinton will have the unitary authority to deem any American citizen a threat and order them imprisoned without any access to US Courts.
Do you believe that the US Supreme Court was correct in its ruling, and is John McCain correct in his interpretation of the US Supreme Court decisions?
If President Obama or President Clinton orders you to be swept up, sent to a secret location, and then tortured, as President Bush argues is the right of the US president, will you confess to being a terrorist, or will you claim that you are being held contrary to your rights?
If you are being held contrary to your rights, which rights are you claiming?
Certainly you would not claim the US Constitution gives you rights, unless you believe the conservative, strict constructionist, non-judicial activist, justices are wrong, and the liberal justices are correct.
|
ONLY a Republican President should have such powers.
__________________
President-elect Clinton fooled the American people
|
| Thread Tools |
|
|
| Display Modes |
 Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
|
