Argue With Everyone Political Forums  

Go Back   Argue With Everyone Political Forums > General Political Debate > The Courts

Your Ad Here
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #51 (permalink)  
Old 04-09-2008, 03:34 PM
Political Guru
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 733
Default

Wo!

Hey, moron. Do you ever read before you regurgitate? FISA required warrants.

Stick to explaining how the loss in Vietnam led to the Cold War.

I would be interested in an essay from you on what it feels like to be the biggest bozo on this bus.
Reply With Quote
  #52 (permalink)  
Old 04-09-2008, 03:49 PM
Machiavelli Incarnate
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 11,108
Default

Quote:
Democrats play partisan politics with national security.
>>>Nobody allowed Jimmy Carter the authority to make people disappear. That's a few steps beyong eavesdropping, doncha think?
Reply With Quote
  #53 (permalink)  
Old 04-09-2008, 04:06 PM
Amazed's Avatar
Political Mastermind
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Omaha, which is why Dave won't come here
Posts: 2,404
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bonzo'sCostar View Post
Wo!

Hey, moron. Do you ever read before you regurgitate? FISA required warrants.

Stick to explaining how the loss in Vietnam led to the Cold War.

I would be interested in an essay from you on what it feels like to be the biggest bozo on this bus.

What you don't know about FISA would fill volume's. Historically the SC has held that the Prez did NOT need them in protecting the Nation in times of War....

The Truong court, as did all the other courts to have decided the issue, held that the President did have inherent authority to conduct warrantless searches to obtain foreign intelligence information.26 It was incumbent upon the court, therefore, to determine the boundaries of that constitutional authority in the case before it. We take for granted that the President does have that authority and, assuming that is so, FISA could not encroach on the President’s constitutional power. The question before us is the reverse, does FISA amplify the President’s power by providing a mechanism that at least approaches a classic warrant and which therefore supports the government’s contention that FISA searches are constitutionally reasonable.

Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court of Review Opinion

Best not to talk of things you have absolutely no knowledge of.
Reply With Quote
  #54 (permalink)  
Old 04-09-2008, 04:07 PM
Yellowjacket's Avatar
Political Junkie
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Ohio
Posts: 173
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by RAIDER56 View Post
good observation.I have been wondering where in the constitution is
the fedaral government given the ability to create so many, or any
for that matter regulatory commissions.Such as the highways and
transportation bodies.The federal government is only there to protect
our borders( which they are not doing well) and regulatory bodies
and rules are to be run by state.In the hands of the federal government
these agencies become about profit and coruption
For interesting reading, try the U.S. Constitution, Article I, Section 8 and Article II, Section 2.

LII: Constitution
Reply With Quote
  #55 (permalink)  
Old 04-10-2008, 11:13 AM
wow's Avatar
wow wow is offline
Machiavelli Incarnate
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: The Republic of Texas
Posts: 5,503
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bonzo'sCostar View Post
Wo!

Hey, moron. Do you ever read before you regurgitate? FISA required warrants.

Stick to explaining how the loss in Vietnam led to the Cold War.

I would be interested in an essay from you on what it feels like to be the biggest bozo on this bus.
Stick to explaining how the loss in Vietnam led to the Cold War.
The USSR armed and funded the Vietnam war against Americans.
Democrats surrendered to the Communists and the Communists figured they could keep pushing around Americans.....until Ronald Reagan ended the white flag diplomacy.
__________________
Victory in Iraq
Reply With Quote
  #56 (permalink)  
Old 04-10-2008, 09:31 PM
Machiavelli Incarnate
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 4,944
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by wow View Post
Stick to explaining how the loss in Vietnam led to the Cold War.
The USSR armed and funded the Vietnam war against Americans.
Democrats surrendered to the Communists and the Communists figured they could keep pushing around Americans.....until Ronald Reagan ended the white flag diplomacy.
Do you know where Vietnam is?Why were we in Vietnam>
__________________
I respect your right to have your own opinion,but I do not necessarily respect your opinion.
Reply With Quote
  #57 (permalink)  
Old 04-11-2008, 02:11 AM
noneof yourbusiness's Avatar
Machiavelli Incarnate
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 13,136
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by wow
Stick to explaining how the loss in Vietnam led to the Cold War.
The USSR armed and funded the Vietnam war against Americans.
Democrats surrendered to the Communists and the Communists figured they could keep pushing around Americans.....until Ronald Reagan ended the white flag diplomacy.
Jesus fuckign christ. You are the dumb and crazy. Amazing.

Are all you little fuckers in your 20's? Vietnam LED?!?!? to. FDR's Soviet cocksucking allowed this "Cold war" to occur. It was widley known by educated folks that by 1947 this "War" was pretty much on. Vietnam is but one chapter further down the line.
__________________
Cussing out low class inbreds isnt uninteligent, its honest

Good typing is not inteligent its dexiteritous.

Everything you just said is total bullshit

Patriotism is the last refuge of a scoundrel.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-V8Ek...eature=related
Reply With Quote
  #58 (permalink)  
Old 04-11-2008, 10:22 AM
wow's Avatar
wow wow is offline
Machiavelli Incarnate
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: The Republic of Texas
Posts: 5,503
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by sotmfs View Post
Do you know where Vietnam is?Why were we in Vietnam>
Dumb question.
__________________
Victory in Iraq
Reply With Quote
  #59 (permalink)  
Old 04-11-2008, 10:28 AM
wow's Avatar
wow wow is offline
Machiavelli Incarnate
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: The Republic of Texas
Posts: 5,503
Default

I'm old enough to remember these anti-war protesters lying about Vietnam.
These Liberals would say "We are not fighting Communism in Vietnam, we are creating Communism in Vietnam by being there"
American POWs were being tortured by Communists from all over the world and these Liberals keep lying about it and calling our troops baby killers.
All you have to do is replace Vietnam with the word "Iraq" and we have the same lies being repeated today.
__________________
Victory in Iraq
Reply With Quote
  #60 (permalink)  
Old 04-11-2008, 10:32 AM
Machiavelli Incarnate
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 14,347
Default

"All you have to do is replace Vietnam with the word "Iraq" and we have the same lies being repeated today."
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On
Forum Jump


» Navigation

Political Links Page

Blogs by AWE Members

Advertisers support this site - if you're interested in their product, take a look!


$5 monthly donation:

$10 monthly donation:



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:29 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.2.0
Ad Management by RedTyger
Poltical Topsites PolitiPoll.net - Political Web Rankings