More racism from Liberals

Carson · #21 (**permalink**) 03-28-2008, 02:14 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by wow

Many people agree with you!

their is nothing in your post that shows the officer was innocent or guilty of anything

oceanbreeze · #22 (**permalink**) 03-28-2008, 02:14 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Carson

no the purpose of court is justice

Hypocrit. How do you think cases get to court? The Police.

Carson · #23 (**permalink**) 03-28-2008, 02:15 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by oceanbreeze

Hypocrit. How do you think cases get to court? The Police.

try making a comment that makes sense ocean, I know you can do it

wow · #24 (**permalink**) 03-29-2008, 11:36 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bonzo'sCostar

Did I say that? Or was this yet another attempt at wit from a weak-minded, intellectual wussy, lashing out desperately with limp-wristed slaps?

No, you did not say that.
But, if you are Obama or one of his supporters, you justify your greed for cracker's money by using slavery.
When Obama collects $100 Trillion from African nations, then American crackers should pay up! Good luck!

wow · #25 (**permalink**) 03-29-2008, 11:39 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DEMOCANT

This is the truth, so Obama will have to pay reparations to himself for slavery, being half white. Rev. Wright is also at least half-white, so he's going to have to "pop a cap" in his white half. It's confusing but it will work out fine like all things African......

Hahahaha This should be formed into a "youtube" question for Obomber for their next debate.
Oh wait, that would be unfair because Obomber is half black.
This gets confusing!

wow · #26 (**permalink**) 03-29-2008, 11:42 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Carson

their is nothing in your post that shows the officer was innocent or guilty of anything

I agree, but I was responding to this post.... Originally Posted by World Hegemony View Post
There is none. No racism. Just a man killing another man. A police officer for that matter. Someone who kills an innocent person deserves death. That simple.

wow · #27 (**permalink**) 03-29-2008, 12:07 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Carson

no the purpose of court is justice

Originally Posted by wow View Post
A mostly white jury means this conviction was wrong? No but it doesn't mean anything about the case spreads racial hatred either.
If this is to be true, then couldn't we say that anything less than the death penalty is wrong, because the white cop was shot by a black man? it could have been a justifiable homicide, its not like you provided any details
Equality is the objective, right?
no the purpose of court is justice

The convicted criminal's lawyer implied this verdict was tainted with racism because the jury was mostly white.
If that is not spreading racial hatred, then I do not know what it is?
Since, I'm a cracker, I'm a racism expert, right?

it could have been a justifiable homicide, its not like you provided any details
The convicted criminal's lawyer did not mention justifiable homicide. He mentioned the skin color of the jurors.

no the purpose of court is justice
The convicted criminal's lawyer did not dispute the conviction or legal justice, he objected to the skin color of some jurors and then demanded his client be freed.

*This is a gross example of the racial hatred being promoted in America by people like Obama and his supporters.

*The Civil Rights Bill of 1964, Congressional voting results:

The original House version:

* Democratic Party: 164-96 (63%-37%)
* Republican Party: 138-34 (80%-20%)

The Senate version:

* Democratic Party: 46-22 (68%-32%)
* Republican Party: 27-6 (82%-18%)

The Senate version, voted on by the House:

* Democratic Party: 153-91 (63%-37%)
* Republican Party: 186-35 (84%-16%)

SaintMalaclypse · #28 (**permalink**) 03-29-2008, 01:36 PM

The story isn't really spreading racism...

The kind of people who are racist will see racism everywhere, regardless of whether someone else points it out.

The kind of people who aren't racist will see a story about a policeman getting murdered, and may or may not care that some of the people in the story appear to be racist.

Either way, this story isn't going to change anyone's degree of racism one way or the other. If it were that simple, the left would churn out Equality books all day long and the Right would churn out Superiority books all day long to convert the masses.

I, on the other hand, would churn out "Give Me a Dollar" books all day long.

Carson · #29 (**permalink**) 03-30-2008, 12:58 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by wow

Originally Posted by wow View Post
A mostly white jury means this conviction was wrong? No but it doesn't mean anything about the case spreads racial hatred either.
If this is to be true, then couldn't we say that anything less than the death penalty is wrong, because the white cop was shot by a black man? it could have been a justifiable homicide, its not like you provided any details
Equality is the objective, right?
no the purpose of court is justice

The convicted criminal's lawyer implied this verdict was tainted with racism because the jury was mostly white.
If that is not spreading racial hatred, then I do not know what it is?
Since, I'm a cracker, I'm a racism expert, right? I'm a cracker too but it is the job of the defendant's lawyer to raise every possible doubt he can. The man was just doing his job.

it could have been a justifiable homicide, its not like you provided any details
The convicted criminal's lawyer did not mention justifiable homicide. He mentioned the skin color of the jurors. I was just saying without the details it is impossible to determine the innocence or guilt of either party

no the purpose of court is justice
The convicted criminal's lawyer did not dispute the conviction or legal justice, he objected to the skin color of some jurors and then demanded his client be freed. He did his job, whats the point?

*This is a gross example of the racial hatred being promoted in America by people like Obama and his supporters. If it was anybody but the lawyer of the defendant I would agree, I don't think this lawyer was trying to do anything but get his client off the hook by whatever means necessary

*The Civil Rights Bill of 1964, Congressional voting results:

The original House version:

* Democratic Party: 164-96 (63%-37%)
* Republican Party: 138-34 (80%-20%)

The Senate version:

* Democratic Party: 46-22 (68%-32%)
* Republican Party: 27-6 (82%-18%)

The Senate version, voted on by the House:

* Democratic Party: 153-91 (63%-37%)
* Republican Party: 186-35 (84%-16%)

Why did you post this Civil Rights Bill BS?

gbig · #30 (**permalink**) 03-30-2008, 01:13 PM

This guy is an animal. White, black, green, even a if he is a liberal, he should be treated simply as the animal he is and get the dirt blanket as soon as possible. 25 years this guy has been eating our food and putting his feces in our sewers. the cop he killed, a young 25 yo didnt have the last 25, i guess Bonzo's ability to empathize is stunted.