Argue With Everyone Political Forums  

Go Back   Argue With Everyone Political Forums > General Political Debate > The Courts

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #11 (permalink)  
Old 12-24-2007, 03:17 PM
Cookie Parker's Avatar
Political Mastermind
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 2,494
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by marmalade6 View Post
Don't you think Cookie's thread might be in response to the courts recent decisions which carry the appearance of political influence.

Forinstance, recent states and supreme court decisions redefining Eminent Domain. Do you believe the intent of E.D. is to seize private property for private development on behalf of private developers?

Hasn't this "fudging" of previously assumed protections occurred under the watch of Bush?

Welcome to AWE, by the way.

Thanks for getting this back on track....
__________________
http://americanpoliticsandmore.com/forum/index.php


When you want to know the truth, search all articles available on your topic. The truth lies somewhere between it all.
Reply With Quote
  #12 (permalink)  
Old 12-24-2007, 10:17 PM
Political Junkie
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Heartland - USA
Posts: 104
Default

That's an interesting hypothesis.

Eminent Domain, a legal concept that previously permitted government to acquire private property at "fair market prices" for the benefit of the community or political entity it represented; has been expanded by a court decision to include government's ability to acquire private property to turn it over to another private owner for the sake of development, thereby increasing the tax base.
The basis for your presentation is accurate if you presume the Supremes are a product of the Bush Administration. In that event, it is only logical to extend such reasoning to all decisions issued by the court during the entire eight years of the present administration.
A logical extension of that conclusion therefore must be that with the election of a Democrat to the White House in 2008, does the Court automatically become a "Democrat" court as of January 20, 2009; and will the next President be held as "responsible" for the court's decisions as is President Bush today?
__________________
Since you are reading this ... thank a teacher. Since you are reading this in English ... thank a veteran.
Reply With Quote
  #13 (permalink)  
Old 12-24-2007, 10:36 PM
ONEWHITEDUCK's Avatar
ONEWHITEDUCK
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Puget Sound
Posts: 21,412
Default

LET ME KNOCK THIS TRAIN OFF THE TRACK AGAIN

WHAT IS THE IGNORER COOKIE PARKER DOING ON AN ARGUE SITE.......WITH BACK-UP FROM A NEW DIP WAD SUPPOSED TEACHER

DON'T YOU KNOW TEACHERS ARE HOMO PSYCHIATRY PUSHERS FOR THE NWO

Live Search: TEACHERS ARE HOMO PSYCHIATRY PUSHERS FOR THE NWO

WHATS A HALO

ANGELS DON'T PLAY THIS HAARP

what is operation mocking bird TEACHER

ANSWER UP OR FUCK YOURSELF
__________________
If you don't KNOW where you come from...you WILL wind up going nowhere.

That goes for Ideas, institutions as well as individuals :-I

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nUncnWxjUXM
^You CAN Handle The Truth - TRANCE Form America - 3of7

PSI TECH INVESTIGATIONS and LAW ENFORCEMENT

~777~ "THE AWACS ANGEL CODE"
Reply With Quote
  #14 (permalink)  
Old 12-25-2007, 02:33 AM
Political Mastermind
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Connecticut
Posts: 1,046
Default

Centurion,

The term to me would be "influenced by" the Bush era of corruption to disregard long held public understanding of protection from eminent domain.

Were not real taxes being paid by the original homeowners. So, it appears to be an opportunistic move by the town (New London lets say) to increase town income at the expense of a lovely neighborhood with views of the Sound.

Whether democrat or republican, the eight years of corruption under the Bush administration has caused corruption to become pretty much systemic in government and the corporate world, doncha think?
Reply With Quote
  #15 (permalink)  
Old 12-25-2007, 03:15 PM
One_Man_Gang's Avatar
Political Novice
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 3
Default An agent of change

"When you can't make them see the light, make them feel the heat." (Ronald Reagan, 1911-2004):beat dead horse
Reply With Quote
  #16 (permalink)  
Old 12-25-2007, 04:59 PM
ONEWHITEDUCK's Avatar
ONEWHITEDUCK
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Puget Sound
Posts: 21,412
Default

THE WINDS OF CHANGE

YouTube - Calvin and Hobbes - Breakaway


^I^

YouTube - Scorpions "Wind of Change" music video

^I^
__________________
If you don't KNOW where you come from...you WILL wind up going nowhere.

That goes for Ideas, institutions as well as individuals :-I

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nUncnWxjUXM
^You CAN Handle The Truth - TRANCE Form America - 3of7

PSI TECH INVESTIGATIONS and LAW ENFORCEMENT

~777~ "THE AWACS ANGEL CODE"
Reply With Quote
  #17 (permalink)  
Old 12-27-2007, 05:16 AM
Moggy's Avatar
Political Mastermind
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: The Greatest Nation on Earth, Australia
Posts: 1,388
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by crowonapost View Post
Um ....... on the back cover of my pet goat.

he scribbled something about goats & eating paper...I think it was originally on hemp too.
What the bushes growing hemp, unbelievable.
__________________
To Love and be Loved, thats all that is required.

CHIEF CRAZY CROTCH
Reply With Quote
  #18 (permalink)  
Old 12-27-2007, 05:21 AM
Moggy's Avatar
Political Mastermind
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: The Greatest Nation on Earth, Australia
Posts: 1,388
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Cookie Parker View Post
Court to be a third branch of our government who defends the constitution and not redefines it...
Can you post more info, won't use links on this forum, not after my experiences with some spammers on this site.
Interested cookie.

Bush is a fool, like our recently disposed leader, Howard. Problem is Rudd is starting to prove the same, with regards of Kowtowing to your Government.
__________________
To Love and be Loved, thats all that is required.

CHIEF CRAZY CROTCH

Last edited by Moggy; 12-27-2007 at 05:22 AM. Reason: can't be bothered
Reply With Quote
  #19 (permalink)  
Old 12-27-2007, 05:49 AM
Cookie Parker's Avatar
Political Mastermind
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 2,494
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Moggy View Post
Can you post more info, won't use links on this forum, not after my experiences with some spammers on this site.
Interested cookie.

Bush is a fool, like our recently disposed leader, Howard. Problem is Rudd is starting to prove the same, with regards of Kowtowing to your Government.
Sure..here's the constitution...

United States Constitution - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Quote:
The Constitution consists of a preamble, seven original articles, twenty-seven amendments, and a paragraph certifying its enactment by the constitutional convention.

[edit] Preamble: Statement of purpose

Main article: Preamble to the United States Constitution

The Preamble states:
“ We the People of the United States, in Order to form a more perfect Union, establish Justice, insure domestic Tranquility, provide for the common defence, promote the general Welfare, and secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity, do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America. ”

The Preamble neither grants any powers nor inhibits any actions; it only explains the rationale behind the Constitution and notes by what authority it is enacted. The preamble is a basic statement of purpose that precedes the constitution. The Preamble, especially the first three words ("We the people"), is one of the most-quoted sections of the Constitution.

[edit] Article One: Legislative power

Main article: Article One of the United States Constitution

Article One establishes the legislative branch of government, the United States Congress, which includes the House of Representatives and the Senate. The Article establishes the manner of election and qualifications of members of each House. In addition, it provides for free debate in Congress and limits self-serving behavior of congressmen, outlines legislative procedure and indicates the powers of the legislative branch. There is a debate as to whether the powers listed in Article 1 Section 8 are a list of enumerated powers. These powers may also be interpreted as a list of powers, formerly either executive or judicial in nature, that have been explicitly granted to the U.S. Congress. This interpretation may be further supported by a broad definition of both the commerce clause and the necessary-and-proper clause of the Constitution. The argument for enumerated powers can be traced back to the 1819 McCulloch v. Maryland United States Supreme Court ruling. Finally, it establishes limits on federal and state legislative power.

[edit] Article Two: Executive power

Main article: Article Two of the United States Constitution

Article Two describes the presidency (the executive branch): procedures for the selection of the president, qualifications for office, the oath to be affirmed and the powers and duties of the office. It also provides for the office of Vice President of the United States, and specifies that the Vice President succeeds to the presidency if the President is incapacitated, dies, or resigns, although whether this succession was on an acting or permanent basis was left unclear. In practice, this has always been treated as succession, and the 25th Amendment provides explicitly for succession. Article Two also provides for the impeachment and removal from office of civil officers (the President, Vice President, judges, and others).

[edit] Article Three: Judicial power

Main article: Article Three of the United States Constitution

Article Three describes the court system (the judicial branch), including the supreme Court. The article requires that there be one court called the supreme Court; Congress, at its discretion, can create lower courts, whose judgments and orders are reviewable by the supreme Court. Article Three also requires trial by jury in all criminal cases, defines the crime of treason, and charges Congress with providing for a punishment for it. It also sets the kinds of cases that may be heard by the federal judiciary, which cases the supreme Court may hear first (called original jurisdiction), and that all other cases heard by the supreme Court are by appeal.

[edit] Article Four: States' powers and limits

Main article: Article Four of the United States Constitution

Article Four describes the relationship between the states and the Federal government and amongst the states. For instance, it requires states to give "full faith and credit" to the public acts, records and court proceedings of the other states. Congress is permitted to regulate the manner in which proof of such acts, records or proceedings may be admitted. The "privileges and immunities" clause prohibits state governments from discriminating against citizens of other states in favor of resident citizens (e.g., having tougher penalties for residents of Ohio convicted of crimes within Michigan). It also establishes extradition between the states, as well as laying down a legal basis for freedom of movement and travel amongst the states. Today, this provision is sometimes taken for granted, especially by citizens who live near state borders; but in the days of the Articles of Confederation, crossing state lines was often a much more arduous (and costly) process. Article Four also provides for the creation and admission of new states. The Territorial Clause gives Congress the power to make rules for disposing of Federal property and governing non-state territories of the United States. Finally, the fourth section of Article Four requires the United States to guarantee to each state a republican form of government, and to protect the states from invasion and violence.

[edit] Article Five: Process of Amendments

Main article: Article Five of the United States Constitution

Article Five describes the process necessary to amend the Constitution. It establishes two methods of proposing amendments: by Congress or by a national convention requested by the states. Under the first method, Congress can propose an amendment by a two-thirds vote (of a quorum, not necessarily of the entire body) of the Senate and of the House of Representatives. Under the second method, two-thirds (2/3) of the state legislatures may convene and "apply" to Congress to hold a national convention, whereupon Congress must call such a convention for the purpose of considering amendments. As of 2007, only the first method (proposal by Congress) has been used.

Once proposed—whether submitted by Congress or by a national convention—amendments must then be ratified by three-fourths (3/4) of the states to take effect. Article Five gives Congress the option of requiring ratification by state legislatures or by special conventions assembled in the states. The convention method of ratification has been used only once (to approve the 21st Amendment). Article Five currently places only one limitation on the amending power—that no amendment can deprive a state of its equal representation in the Senate without that state's consent.

[edit] Article Six: Federal power

Main article: Article Six of the United States Constitution

Article Six establishes the Constitution, and the laws and treaties of the United States made in accordance with it, to be the supreme law of the land, and that "the judges in every state shall be bound thereby, any thing in the laws or constitutions of any state notwithstanding." It also validates national debt created under the Articles of Confederation and requires that all legislators, federal officers, and judges take oaths or affirmations to "support" the Constitution. This means that the states' constitutions and laws should not conflict with the laws of the federal constitution—and that in case of a conflict, state judges are legally bound to honor the federal laws and constitution over those of any state.

Article Six also states that "no religious Test shall ever be required as a Qualification to any Office or public Trust under the United States".

[edit] Article Seven: Ratification

Main article: Article Seven of the United States Constitution

Article Seven sets forth the requirements for ratification of the Constitution. The Constitution would not take effect until at least nine states had ratified the Constitution in state conventions specially convened for that purpose. (See above Drafting and ratification requirements
__________________
http://americanpoliticsandmore.com/forum/index.php


When you want to know the truth, search all articles available on your topic. The truth lies somewhere between it all.
Reply With Quote
  #20 (permalink)  
Old 12-27-2007, 06:03 AM
Moggy's Avatar
Political Mastermind
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: The Greatest Nation on Earth, Australia
Posts: 1,388
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Cookie Parker View Post
Good read, thanks Cookie, but who sets the limits of self-serving Congressmen, why did your nation vote in a family who's origins stem from the Germanic Nazi Party. Lets face it Cookie, only in America, during the 1930's an 1940's do you see the Nazi flag and American flag flying together, recorded on film.
__________________
To Love and be Loved, thats all that is required.

CHIEF CRAZY CROTCH
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On
Forum Jump


» Navigation

Political Links Page

Blogs by AWE Members

Advertisers support this site - if you're interested in their product, take a look!


$5 monthly donation:

$10 monthly donation:



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:06 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.2.0