Okay, I'll argue with Einstein

gcburns · #1 (**permalink**) 03-05-2008, 06:16 PM

Time and Space?

I'm here to argue. I don't think Einstein himself could win this argument. And I'm not saying he's not right. He could be, but where is the answer to this argument in any of his work, or that of any physicist since? I understand the theories well enough. Yet I keep coming back to a fundamental flaw.

The theory has cracks because of its dependance on the human inability to percieve light until it reaches their eyes. Our ability to sense light as vision is a human perspective of a moving substance. How can you create a theory based so heavily on human perspective?

Read about the theory. One argument it makes is that a single event appears to happen at different times depending on where the subjects is. And therefore everything is relative to the subject.

Well thats the whole problem. Things do appear, don't they, but thats not necessarilly how they exist. The extent of the human senses does not define the laws of the universe. I propose a theory of universal perspective. Because the theory of relativety is based largely on the human perspective, not on that of the universe. Yes, I'm calling you out Einstein.

A. Crowley · #2 (**permalink**) 03-05-2008, 06:18 PM

Hey DammitBoy![sic]!

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA H!!!!!!!!

IHNR · #3 (**permalink**) 03-06-2008, 08:52 AM

You have to be fucking kidding me... If you want, I'll play for Einstein's team and you can debate away.

You are not that bright and I CAN SEE (EVEN WITHOUT LIGHT) that you will be easy pickin's Stupid.

IHNR · #4 (**permalink**) 03-06-2008, 08:54 AM

Anyone else want in on this subject (NATHAN?) not dom of course, his small mind can't grasp these complex theories. He has proved this before so if doesn't want to try he can play for team dipshit and I'll play for team Relativity in Einstein's stead.

icarus5 · #5 (**permalink**) 06-19-2008, 08:24 AM

gcburns..
first of all,you try and this is more then ather do.
second what is you alternative?
what do you adopt /and what not?? string /big bang/all ???
who do you see the universe today ??

icarus5
universe at time minus

IHNR · #6 (**permalink**) 06-19-2008, 11:41 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by IHNR

You have to be fucking kidding me... If you want, I'll play for Einstein's team and you can debate away.

You are not that bright and I CAN SEE (EVEN WITHOUT LIGHT) that you will be easy pickin's Stupid.

Again... I'm on Team Einstein.

IHNR · #7 (**permalink**) 06-19-2008, 11:42 AM

Hey Dom... want to prove how little you know about cosmology? CHALLENGE.

TakuanSoho · #8 (**permalink**) 06-19-2008, 11:43 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by gcburns

Time and Space?

I'm here to argue. I don't think Einstein himself could win this argument. And I'm not saying he's not right. He could be, but where is the answer to this argument in any of his work, or that of any physicist since? I understand the theories well enough. Yet I keep coming back to a fundamental flaw.

The theory has cracks because of its dependance on the human inability to percieve light until it reaches their eyes. Our ability to sense light as vision is a human perspective of a moving substance. How can you create a theory based so heavily on human perspective?

Read about the theory. One argument it makes is that a single event appears to happen at different times depending on where the subjects is. And therefore everything is relative to the subject.

Well thats the whole problem. Things do appear, don't they, but thats not necessarilly how they exist. The extent of the human senses does not define the laws of the universe. I propose a theory of universal perspective. Because the theory of relativety is based largely on the human perspective, not on that of the universe. Yes, I'm calling you out Einstein.

Uhm, we can measure light with machines in ways far more detailed than the human eye can measure.

IHNR · #9 (**permalink**) 06-19-2008, 12:00 PM

Actually humans can't perceive that time and space are woven together... Einstein was the king of the "thought experiment" which means he could run experiments in his mind that could never be run in a lab.

This was something that even Newton couldn't do... in fact he never even tried to explain how gravity worked, just that "it did."

IHNR · #10 (**permalink**) 06-19-2008, 12:02 PM

Is this some bullshit religious debate against evolution?