Okay, I'll argue with Einstein

icarus5 · #21 (**permalink**) 06-19-2008, 02:49 PM

and might Anti-Matter,this is just area/or matterial that change his state..??
calculate the hit at supernova..??

icarus5

icarus5 · #22 (**permalink**) 06-19-2008, 02:54 PM

Quote:

Actually do you know that Einstein didn't want to believe in the bang because that meant that if there was a beginning then the universe must have an end

look at page 2..
the tme was before the universe and after the universe will be..

about the big bang,as much as i like not to believe at,but with any point i am going,i am also backing to that point also ,so silly of me..

cohen avshalom charly
israel/haifa
icarus5

icarus5 · #23 (**permalink**) 06-19-2008, 02:57 PM

Quote:

they are stupid and love to show their ignorance

that ok-i am also ignorance ,--but with good hope...

cohen avshalom charly
israel/haifa
icarus5

Cordelier · #24 (**permalink**) 06-20-2008, 06:20 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TakuanSoho

Uhm, we can measure light with machines in ways far more detailed than the human eye can measure.

Have we even resolved what exactly light is yet? How'd that whole wave vs. particle debate turn out?

Back Atcha · #25 (**permalink**) 06-20-2008, 06:37 PM

Hey Cord... we're getting close...

Slashdot | Fastest-Ever Flashgun Captures Image of Light Wave

Lummy · #26 (**permalink**) 06-22-2008, 05:44 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by gcburns

Well thats the whole problem. Things do appear, don't they, but thats not necessarilly how they exist. The extent of the human senses does not define the laws of the universe. I propose a theory of universal perspective. Because the theory of relativety is based largely on the human perspective, not on that of the universe. Yes, I'm calling you out Einstein.

This morning, I crossed a busy street thinking to myself gcb is onto something. I concentrated hard, and every one of the eight vehicles I crossed paths with simply traveled right through me. Either they weren't there in the first place at the same time I was, or I wasn't actually there when they were. I sit here living proof that you are correct.

Cordelier · #27 (**permalink**) 06-22-2008, 08:04 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Back Atcha

Hey Cord... we're getting close...

Slashdot | Fastest-Ever Flashgun Captures Image of Light Wave

We already knew that light acted as a wave, didn't we? Huygens could have told you that back in the 1600's and he didn't need a picture to do it. Doesn't mean Newton was wrong about how it acted like a particle, though.

I think E.T. had it right... the universe is about Reese's Pieces. It doesn't have to be about chocolate or peanut butter - why can't it be both? *L*

Back Atcha · #28 (**permalink**) 06-24-2008, 02:43 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Cordelier

I think E.T. had it right... the universe is about Reese's Pieces. It doesn't have to be about chocolate or peanut butter - why can't it be both? *L*

THAT.... is fantastic... ty

Cordelier · #29 (**permalink**) 06-26-2008, 01:19 AM

*L* My pleasure...

E.T. had it right about a lot of things... like if you're going to call across the galaxy, the smart way to avoid the roaming charges is to use someone else's phone.

r8dmarshall · #30 (**permalink**) 06-26-2008, 09:54 PM

gcb:

Unless one gives the Universe self awareness, one must use a theory based upon human prespective. It ,though is possible to use abstract thought to base a different human prespective regarding the static electrical attraction that attracts non ferrous materials.

One can have a Universal theory, but only from human awareness of the Universe.