Thread: Good example of lib media distortion on abortion.

You can search and find lots of items on lib media sites (I heard it on the HLN network, owned by ultra-lib CNN) that a judge has restrained a new oklahoma law that would report the "personal information" of women who have abortions, on a web site.

Actually, the Statistical Reporting of Abortions Act, passed by an overwhelming number of oklahoma legislators and signed by the governor, would report anonymous STATISTICAL information on such as women's reasons for getting an abortion. This is about like if you got a speeding ticket, and the National Highway Safety Administration published the total speeding tickets in the country for a year, you claimed they were divulging your personal information. The purpose of the law is an attempt to find ways to prevent abortion by determining why they occur. The opponents of the law are using this trick because they know that is the case, and because for them, the only bad abortion is the one that doesn't happen.

Liberals love privacy when it comes to their destructive nature. Being a whore, being a killer... But then suddenly when we want privacy at the air-port, at the gas pump, at Wal-Mart, on the highway... suddenly liberals aren't so interested in our privacy.

You have to ask yourself if these assclowns are purposely trying to be evil, because why would you be so militant in protecting whores and babykillers, but not letting us go about our daily lives relatively government free? Do you just like making people suffer and die?

Originally Posted by Demonman

Liberals love privacy when it comes to their destructive nature. Being a whore, being a killer... But then suddenly when we want privacy at the air-port, at the gas pump, at Wal-Mart, on the highway... suddenly liberals aren't so interested in our privacy.

You have to ask yourself if these assclowns are purposely trying to be evil, because why would you be so militant in protecting whores and babykillers, but not letting us go about our daily lives relatively government free? Do you just like making people suffer and die?

LMAO! You actually think you're going to get any privacy at wallyworld, the gas pump, airport, or the highway? That is too funny! {still laughing}
You won't have any privacy in any of those places. I'm surprised you didn't mention a truck stop in all your nonsense.

Originally Posted by Demonman

Liberals love privacy when it comes to their destructive nature. Being a whore, being a killer... But then suddenly when we want privacy at the air-port, at the gas pump, at Wal-Mart, on the highway... suddenly liberals aren't so interested in our privacy.

You have to ask yourself if these assclowns are purposely trying to be evil, because why would you be so militant in protecting whores and babykillers, but not letting us go about our daily lives relatively government free? Do you just like making people suffer and die?

Isn't it obvious?

They do their BEST to get people to 'embrace sexuality' (AKA bunnyhop like rabbits thinking its not meant for marriage and babies but fun with strangers), look at wolf, she says how great it is being a bohemian, and spouting how great protection is, and then she admits she 'cuts corners'.

Abortion is the greatest bastion of defense of the ones pushing promiscuity.

STDs are ALMOST covered by their protection-argument except HPV/cervical cancer doesn't care if there's lining or not in between. Protection only protects from MOST problems.

KY here doesn't even understand properly what is meant by privacy and truck stops to begin with, her reply is not even in the ballpark of context. She also noticeably fails to mention/deflect the 'evil ' thing.....

Some may consider what information this law will reveal in fact personal, the bottom line is, this information is

1) Date of abortion
2) County in which abortion is performed
3) Age of mother
4) Marital status of mother
5) Race of mother
6) Years of education of mother
7) State or foreign country of residence of mother
8) Total number of previous pregnancies of the mother

It's all about personal opinion on this matter.

Originally Posted by Rick

You can search and find lots of items on lib media sites (I heard it on the HLN network, owned by ultra-lib CNN) that a judge has restrained a new oklahoma law that would report the "personal information" of women who have abortions, on a web site.

Actually, the Statistical Reporting of Abortions Act, passed by an overwhelming number of oklahoma legislators and signed by the governor, would report anonymous STATISTICAL information on such as women's reasons for getting an abortion. This is about like if you got a speeding ticket, and the National Highway Safety Administration published the total speeding tickets in the country for a year, you claimed they were divulging your personal information. The purpose of the law is an attempt to find ways to prevent abortion by determining why they occur. The opponents of the law are using this trick because they know that is the case, and because for them, the only bad abortion is the one that doesn't happen.

We do not want to hurt Planned Parenthood's tax sheltered profits!!

Democrats are forcing the taxpayers to fund abortions!

The taxpayers now control women's bodies!

Women are slaves to the US Govt.

Originally Posted by Shermana

Isn't it obvious?

They do their BEST to get people to 'embrace sexuality' (AKA bunnyhop like rabbits thinking its not meant for marriage and babies but fun with strangers),
sex is different things for different people
look at wolf, she says how great it is being a bohemian,
when did I ever say that?
and spouting how great protection is, and then she admits she 'cuts corners'.
yes. do you have a point?
its always better to use full proof methods, sometimes for one reason or another you use a less reliable method.
Abortion is the greatest bastion of defense of the ones pushing promiscuity.
your defination of 'promiscuity' probably differs from most of the population
STDs are ALMOST covered by their protection-argument except HPV/cervical cancer doesn't care if there's lining or not in between. Protection only protects from MOST problems.
HPV is like the common cold. we have a vacine to protect against most forms of cervical cancer.
there is no reason why one can't have safe sex with reasonable protection from cancers that stem friom HPV (they might even approve the vaccine for males soon)
KY here doesn't even understand properly what is meant by privacy and truck stops to begin with, her reply is not even in the ballpark of context. She also noticeably fails to mention/deflect the 'evil ' thing.....

the evil thing is giving out people's information - information of any kind for whatever purpose

Originally Posted by yayog

Some may consider what information this law will reveal in fact personal, the bottom line is, this information is

1) Date of abortion
2) County in which abortion is performed
3) Age of mother
4) Marital status of mother
5) Race of mother
6) Years of education of mother
7) State or foreign country of residence of mother
8) Total number of previous pregnancies of the mother

It's all about personal opinion on this matter.

exactly. this is about releasing personal information that can pressure women into not aborting in order to protect their privacy

Originally Posted by wolf_22

the evil thing is giving out people's information - information of any kind for whatever purpose



exactly. this is about releasing personal information that can pressure women into not aborting in order to protect their privacy

Sex means different things to different people? What is this sexual philosophy 101?

SEX IS BIOLOGICALLY, NATURALLY, FOR HAVING BABIES. EVERYTHING BESIDES THAT IS A PERSONAL PERVERSION FOR PHYSICAL GRATIFICATION.

Sex is the act of a woman allowing a man she chooses to engage in the act to impregnate her, or a man forcing himself upon her, with or without an aid to prevent the flow of DNA from reaching its biologically directed target of fertilization . The very nature of the pleasure and drive of sex for all species is for REPRODUCTION. Relationships and a woman's emotions involved are all part of the Reproductive process. Most sex is NOT FOR REPRODUCTION. IT IS FOR PERSONAL PERVERSE PHYSICAL PLEASURE, NOT FOR ITS BIOLOGICAL INTENTION.

Interference in that process is NOT NATURAL. Anymore natural than building a coal plant. People are aroused by a variety of things and enjoy the physical pleasure from defiling themselves with their perversions, but in the end....

SEX IS BIOLOGICALLY FOR HAVING BABIES

Originally Posted by Shermana

Sex means different things to different people? What is this sexual philosophy 101?

SEX IS BIOLOGICALLY, NATURALLY, FOR HAVING BABIES EVERYTHING BESIDES THAT IS A PERSONAL PERVERSION FOR PHYSICAL GRATIFICATION
sex can mean many different things and be used in a number of ways over a lifetime
Sex is the act of a woman allowing a man she chooses to engage in the act to impregnate her, sex is also oral sex or anal sex with any number of sexes involved.
or a man forcing himself upon her, thats rape. rape is not sex
with or without an aid to prevent the flow of DNA from reaching its biologically directed target of fertilization . The very nature of the pleasure and drive of sex for all species is for Relationships and a woman's emotions involved are all part of the Reproductive process. Most sex is NOT FOR REPRODUCTION. IT IS FOR PERSONAL PERVERSE PHYSICAL PLEASURE, NOT FOR ITS BIOLOGICAL INTENTION.

its for health, stress relief, bonding, fun, and dozens of other reasons
Interference in that process is NOT NATURAL. Anymore natural than building a coal plant. People are aroused by a variety of things and enjoy the physical pleasure from defiling themselves with their perversions, but in the end....

SEX IS BIOLOGICALLY FOR HAVING BABIES

in the end, thats what sex is for you.
and maybe that will change when you get older. maybe it won't.

maybe you need a new keyboard. your capslock seems to be sticking.
I'd try overstock.com
they have good deals around this time of the year

Originally Posted by wolf_22

the evil thing is giving out people's information - information of any kind for whatever purpose



exactly. this is about releasing personal information that can pressure women into not aborting in order to protect their privacy

Originally Posted by wolf_22

in the end, thats what sex is for you.
and maybe that will change when you get older. maybe it won't.

It won't. As I get older my hate for perverts who try to inflict their perversions on the taxpayer will only grow.

"
its for health, stress relief, bonding, fun, and dozens of other reasons"

No. That's your humanistic categorization of your interpretation. It's for HAVING BABIES. All those are benefits that go with the act. As for 'fun', this is where your interpretation and objective reality comes into friction.

That's what sex is. FOR HAVING BABIES. Transmission of DNA to the egg. The call to reproduce is what even causes the pleasure in the region to begin with, as well as the drive. Hence why people like you need PROTECTION to PROTECT from its NATURAL EFFECTS. What else is it, you got nothing to say on that part I see. Why are humans different than animals in this regard?

Yes, it is physically and psychologically gratifying, and dishonorable people like to trade what feels good with what is best for their body and soul and honor, so what's your point. If you had nuclear war and no more protection and abortion doctors, people would start being more careful who they knock boots with once their costly, unnatural 'alternate options' are gone.' You must have missed the part when I talked about personal perverse practices. The oral and anal stuff is just different ways to pervert yourself. There's been proof that Oral cancer is directed to Oral sex. Oral sex is also a guaranteed way of transmitting Herpes and others and is also starting to be studied as a serious cause of oral cancer (why not, all that DNA passing through morphing cells), and anal sex almost always involves fecal bacteria exchanges and is another extreemly-high risk zone for STD transmission . A sizeable percentage of STDs are said to originate solely from anal activities. Doctors warn against having anal then standard vaginal sex even with protection. Either way, these activities are clearly not natural and are deviations from the intended purpose of the sexual act with obvious consequences. 100,000,000,000 sore asses can't be wrong for one thing.


By the way, your defense of HPV vaccines does not fly, you obviously have not read all the protests and research against them there is, they just like the Swine flu vaxes. Do you want stats on the HPV vaccine? Is that your solution to everything?

As for my capslock, that is to make sure you see my points and don't gloss over and ignore and dance over and tangent away from them, I am used to having to do that to prevent this from happening with most who I argue with because they will fail to address important points.

I know some other things on overstock you can get to help with your 'corner cutting' problem.