
Originally Posted by
TakuanSoho
Ya know Pale, just because you spent hours and hours pouring through medical journals (as you have confessed) to find a couple of articles that supports your position, really doesn't defend your position.
The fact that neither you, nor any other pro choicer can find credible material that rebutts it says it all.

Originally Posted by
TakuanSoho
As I said, it ain't scientists who determine who deserves to covered under the law, but society. So if society says that birth is when protection should be given, well their you have it.
No, that isn't what you have said. You originally said that society determines what is and isn't a human being. Now you have moderated your postion to say that society determines who is covered under the law. It is good to see that you have given up your losing position and have adopted one that is rational and true. Refer to the constitution for further truth about whose life is to be protected without regard to what "society" says and you will be well on the way to abandoning your pro choice position if you are a thinking person.
Why are you wrong? Because I say so....Rosewood
I must put my hand up for that one - I plead total ignorance as to what a "indefninite intergal" is. We are not taught these mathematical concepts in Australia....Hooded
"It's not alive, It's not alive, It's not alive. Because I said it isnt', there's your proof jerk." ...lexi
"As far as your logical fallicy shit - shove it. I am a woman."...naturemomma
Bookmarks