|
View Poll Results: Abortion should be...
|
|
Legal based on "Civil rights"
|
  
|
20 |
50.00% |
|
Legal based on morality
|
  
|
3 |
7.50% |
|
Illegal based on "Civil rights"
|
  
|
6 |
15.00% |
|
Illegal based on morality
|
  
|
11 |
27.50% |
 |
|

06-17-2008, 05:32 AM
|
 |
Machiavelli Incarnate
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 3,831
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by My Winter Storm
More sex education is needed, for a start. Women need to know that contraception is available to them, they need to know how to use it, etc. Sex education in schools would go a long way in helping the situation.
|
We have more sex education in the schools and oddly enough, the more sex ed we get in schools, the more teen pregnancies we get. Clearly your idea hasn't worked. The only way to decrease the numbers of abortions is to ban the proceedure and punish those who are caught.
Quote:
Originally Posted by My Winter Storm
In order to tackle the abortion issue, we need to first understand why women have them. Is it because the contraception fails? Is it because of a lack of contraception? Is it ignorance?
Once we know the answers, we should be able to work on a solution to the problem.[/font]
|
We know precisely why women have abortions. Survey after survey and study after study has been done exactly to find out why women have abortions. The answer? Because the child would inconvenience them.
__________________
"It's not alive, It's not alive, It's not alive. Because I said it isnt', there's your proof jerk." ...lexi
"As far as your logical fallicy shit - shove it. I am a woman."...naturemomma
|

06-17-2008, 06:42 AM
|
 |
Political Junkie
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Australia
Posts: 210
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by PaleRider
We have more sex education in the schools and oddly enough, the more sex ed we get in schools, the more teen pregnancies we get. Clearly your idea hasn't worked. The only way to decrease the numbers of abortions is to ban the proceedure and punish those who are caught.
|
The problem is, if you ban abortion, women will still have them, only this time, they will out their lives at risk, and many will die.
Should we punish those women seeking the abortion, or the abortion providers?
Quote:
Originally Posted by PaleRider
We know precisely why women have abortions. Survey after survey and study after study has been done exactly to find out why women have abortions. The answer? Because the child would inconvenience them.
|
Is there a link to such a study? I don't doubt what you say, but I'd like to check for myself before I reply to this.
__________________
No More Fate And No More Mystery Even As Time Falls Away I Live My Days Every Moment And Its Memory Not Only To Survive, To Die Alive.
|

06-17-2008, 10:52 AM
|
 |
Machiavelli Incarnate
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Huh?
Posts: 6,180
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by PaleRider
Sorry, never happened. Unlike you, I thought out my position long before I began to argue it.
|
Yeah, I never thought about this issue before.
Quote:
Originally Posted by PaleRider
A woman isn't arrested because the supreme court decided roe on the basis that unborns were not human beings and if she is killing a non human, she is not guilty of a crime. Justice Blackmun, however, in his majority decision acknowledged that shoud a case for the personhood of the unborn ever be made, that roe would necessarily be struck down as unborns would be entitled to the protection of the 14th amendment. Such a case for the personhood of the unborn replete with an ever growing body of legal precedent now exists. The supreme court has reversed itself some 200 times in its history, roe will just be one more.
|
Does that make your entire argument logical fallacy then? You are arguing that it is murder which would make it illegal and yet it's not illegal therefore it's not murder?
Quote:
Originally Posted by PaleRider
More logical fallacy. It is clear that you are completely unable to defend your postion or you wouldn't be spending so much time attacking me. If you can't defend your position, why not simply admit it?
|
You've been attacking me from the beginning...speaks volumes about your argument, I guess.
You obviously feel that you have some right to make choices for another adult but don't wish to take responsibility for taking on that authority...perhaps you should get a job in government.
__________________
"All the problems we face in the United States today can be traced to an unenlightened immigration policy on the part of the American Indian."
Which side will you be on?
OBAMA/PEROT
|

06-17-2008, 11:42 AM
|
 |
Machiavelli Incarnate
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 3,831
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by My Winter Storm
The problem is, if you ban abortion, women will still have them, only this time, they will out their lives at risk, and many will die.
|
Some women will attempt to get abortions. So what? Some people go ahead and do every single thing that we have passed laws prohibiting. The law can't stop people from doing a thing, it only provides a means by which to punish them if they do it.
And how much time do you spend worrying about people who get injured or killed while attempting to break other laws?
Quote:
Originally Posted by My Winter Storm
Should we punish those women seeking the abortion, or the abortion providers?
|
Do we presently punish people who attempt to kill others? Is attempted murder not a crime? And if you hire a killer to do the deed for you, are not both you and the hired killer subject to punishment whether you actually kill or not?
Is there a link to such a study? I don't doubt what you say, but I'd like to check for myself before I reply to this.[/quote]
http://www.guttmacher.org/pubs/psrh/full/3711005.pdf
Why Do Women Have Abortions?
Cookie Absent
Reasons Why Women Have Induced Abortions: Evidence from 27 Countries
There are plenty more and all have the same findings within a few percentage points.
__________________
"It's not alive, It's not alive, It's not alive. Because I said it isnt', there's your proof jerk." ...lexi
"As far as your logical fallicy shit - shove it. I am a woman."...naturemomma
|

06-17-2008, 11:52 AM
|
 |
Machiavelli Incarnate
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 3,831
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by areyoushittin'me?
Yeah, I never thought about this issue before.
|
Your arguments don't indicate any real thought. So far they have amounted to no more than one logical fallacy after another. Unless of course, your entire way of thinking is structured on logical fallacy.
Quote:
Originally Posted by areyoushittin'me?
Does that make your entire argument logical fallacy then? You are arguing that it is murder which would make it illegal and yet it's not illegal therefore it's not murder?
|
No it doesn't. You really aren't very good at thinking are you? The whole argument exists because the Supreme Court decided roe on the basis that unborns were not human beings. Slavery is perfectly analogous to this issue. The court said that blacks were not human beings and therefore could be owned as property and used or abused in any manner that the owner of the property wished. That the court said that blacks were not human beings didn't, in fact, make them something other than human beings, it simply allowed a class of human beings to be denied their most basic human rights.
Abortion is exactly the same. The court's decison never made unborns something other than living human beings, it only allowed those who are so inclined to deny a class of human beings their most basic human right.
Quote:
Originally Posted by areyoushittin'me?
You've been attacking me from the beginning...speaks volumes about your argument, I guess.
|
Pointing out the fallacy of your argument constitutes an attack in your mind? If you could put up a coherent argument that isn't rife with faulty logic then we could discuss the issue. So far, however, you haven't been able to do that.
Quote:
Originally Posted by areyoushittin'me?
You obviously feel that you have some right to make choices for another adult but don't wish to take responsibility for taking on that authority...perhaps you should get a job in government.
|
More fallacy. And hypocricy. Tell me, do you have a problem with law that makes child abuse or spousal abuse illegal? After all, unless it is you or your child that is being abused, it really doesn't affect you. Now if you believe that such laws should be stricken from the books to allow people to do as they please, you won't be proven to be a hypocrite but if you have no problem with laws that make certain behaviors illegal then it is a hypocrite that you are.
__________________
"It's not alive, It's not alive, It's not alive. Because I said it isnt', there's your proof jerk." ...lexi
"As far as your logical fallicy shit - shove it. I am a woman."...naturemomma
|

06-17-2008, 01:10 PM
|
 |
Political Mastermind
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 1,221
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by PaleRider
It's apparently not nice to point out the glaring inaccuracies, and contradictions in the pro choicer's arguments.
|
As my friend David Boez would point out, too many people these days think "choice" only refers to abortion. I'd like to hear a presidential candidate say, "I believe in a woman's right to choose. I believe in a woman's right to choose whether to have a child. I believe in a woman's right to choose any job someone will hire her for. I believe in a woman's right to choose to own a gun. I believe in a woman's right to choose the school she thinks is best for her child, public or private. I believe in a woman's right to choose what kinds of art she will spend her money on, even if she prefers Madonna or Randy Travis and Congress wants to give her money to Robert Mapplethorpe or Luciano Pavarotti. I believe in a woman's right to choose to drive a cab, even if she doesn't have a license. I believe in a woman's right to choose the employees she wants for her business, even if they don't fit some government quota. I believe in a woman's right to choose the drugs she prefers for recreation, whether she chooses Coors or cocaine. I believe in a woman's right to choose how to spend all of her hard-earned money, without giving half of it to the government."
Whether or not you support the right to choose abortion, surely that is a more difficult issue, involving more lives and more complexities than the right to choose a school for your child, to use marijuana, or to own a gun. And yet many of the supporters of "a woman's right to choose" don't support a woman's right to make those choices.
__________________
"If capitalism had never existed, any honest humanitarian should have been struggling to invent it. But when you see men struggling to evade its existence, to misrepresent its nature, and to destroy its last remnants - you may be sure that whatever their motives, love for man is not one of them." - Ayn Rand, Capitalism: The Unknown Ideal
Coyote Blog
New Law Trashes Genetic Science
|

06-17-2008, 03:10 PM
|
 |
Machiavelli Incarnate
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Huh?
Posts: 6,180
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by PaleRider
Your arguments don't indicate any real thought. ....You really aren't very good at thinking are you? ...Pointing out the fallacy of your argument constitutes an attack in your mind?
|

__________________
"All the problems we face in the United States today can be traced to an unenlightened immigration policy on the part of the American Indian."
Which side will you be on?
OBAMA/PEROT
|

06-17-2008, 03:26 PM
|
 |
Machiavelli Incarnate
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: On the Beach
Posts: 3,064
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by areyoushittin'me?
Yeah, I never thought about this issue before.
Does that make your entire argument logical fallacy then? You are arguing that it is murder which would make it illegal and yet it's not illegal therefore it's not murder?
You've been attacking me from the beginning...speaks volumes about your argument, I guess.
You obviously feel that you have some right to make choices for another adult but don't wish to take responsibility for taking on that authority...perhaps you should get a job in government.
|
He's been attacking me for so long I had to put him on my ignore list. He gets rabid at times and foams at the mouth. 
__________________
"its potential, its potential, its potential because I said so, there's your proof" --- Palerider
|

06-17-2008, 03:36 PM
|
 |
Machiavelli Incarnate
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Huh?
Posts: 6,180
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Lexi
He's been attacking me for so long I had to put him on my ignore list. He gets rabid at times and foams at the mouth. 
|
It certainly appears to be an exercise in futility trying to carry on a rational discussion with him...that became rather obvious though when from the very beginning he preferred to project what he thinks I believe than to actually have a discussion about it...he simply tries to discount anything that I have to say so I've decided not to bother putting much effort into addressing him.
__________________
"All the problems we face in the United States today can be traced to an unenlightened immigration policy on the part of the American Indian."
Which side will you be on?
OBAMA/PEROT
|

06-17-2008, 04:04 PM
|
 |
Machiavelli Incarnate
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Virginia
Posts: 4,248
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by FreedomForWho
Just a simple poll to see where everyone stands. Please make a post claiming your vote and why.
|
Keep it to the bare essentials. Let those that want to, kill off their offspring. Keep an accurate Record of those that do,,,and after the third time they've used abortion as a Birth Control method, Tie their tubes.
Also,,,request the "Fathers" Name...Obviously he's not worth procreating either. 
__________________
A Liberal is a Man too broadminded to take his own side in a quarrel (Robert Frost 1874-1963).
|
| Thread Tools |
|
|
| Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
|