Poster Boy for Pro Life

Lexi · #1 (**permalink**) 03-31-2008, 02:46 PM

Paleface is just a poster boy for pro life fanatics. There is nothing he has to say about scientific facts that have not been posted all over the internet for anyone that wants to see them.

The only difference is that Pale twists and turns every scientific fact into something completely different to benefit the pro life agendas. What he really doesn't know is that anyone can see right through his shallow facade.

Lexi · #2 (**permalink**) 03-31-2008, 04:32 PM

Twisted facts and pictures of plastic babies, that's what Pale is made of..LOL

Just a Geek that reeks of hypocrisy.

PaleRider · #3 (**permalink**) 03-31-2008, 04:50 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Lexi

Paleface is just a poster boy for pro life fanatics. There is nothing he has to say about scientific facts that have not been posted all over the internet for anyone that wants to see them.

The only difference is that Pale twists and turns every scientific fact into something completely different to benefit the pro life agendas. What he really doesn't know is that anyone can see right through his shallow facade.

Feel free to bring forward any scientific facts that I have "twisted". One of the differences between people like you and people like me is that if I am going to accuse you of lying, or say that you have your facts wrong, I bring forward evidence to support my charge. You, on the other hand start a thread that is a blatant lie and demonstrate that it is a lie by not substantiating your charges.

Just one more reason that I say that you are stupid.

PaleRider · #4 (**permalink**) 03-31-2008, 04:52 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Lexi

Twisted facts and pictures of plastic babies, that's what Pale is made of..LOL

Since I don't post picutres of dead babies, I don't know exactly what your complaint is. The picture is an accurate representation of the size and development of a child between 10 and 12 weeks as the pictures that peach posted showed.

If this is the best you have lexi, then you have less than nothing. You have made yourself look even more (if that is possible) foolish than you looked already.

When you grow up enough to make an argument to support your position, let me know.

Lexi · #5 (**permalink**) 03-31-2008, 04:55 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by PaleRider

Since I don't post picutres of dead babies, I don't know exactly what your complaint is. The picture is an accurate representation of the size and development of a child between 10 and 12 weeks as the pictures that peach posted showed.

If this is the best you have lexi, then you have less than nothing. You have made yourself look even more (if that is possible) foolish than you looked already.

When you grow up enough to make an argument to support your position, let me know.

Get a grip Pale, I never said it was a dead baby, just a plastic image of one.

And you say you don't twist facts..LOL You are truly an amazing liar.

Looking foolish is my way of telling you that you are just full of

so bring all the insults on Pale and make yourself look like even a smaller pile

than you already have..

Lexi · #6 (**permalink**) 03-31-2008, 04:58 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by PaleRider

Feel free to bring forward any scientific facts that I have "twisted". One of the differences between people like you and people like me is that if I am going to accuse you of lying, or say that you have your facts wrong, I bring forward evidence to support my charge. You, on the other hand start a thread that is a blatant lie and demonstrate that it is a lie by not substantiating your charges.

Just one more reason that I say that you are stupid.

None of your evidence was presented with an honest and open opinion, just twisted facts to make the Geek look like he knows more than he really does.

And you think your calling me stupid matters to me??? LOL Wrong again Paleone... as usual...

PaleRider · #7 (**permalink**) 03-31-2008, 05:00 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Lexi

And you say you don't twist facts..LOL You are truly an amazing liar.

Still waiting for evidence. Of course, we both know that it won't be forthcoming because I have no need to twist facts. They support my position so there is no need for twisting. But feel free to prove that you aren't a bald faced liar by bringing your evidence here for all to see.

Lexi · #8 (**permalink**) 03-31-2008, 05:02 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by PaleRider

Still waiting for evidence. Of course, we both know that it won't be forthcoming because I have no need to twist facts. They support my position so there is no need for twisting. But feel free to prove that you aren't a bald faced liar by bringing your evidence here for all to see.

And I'm still waiting for you to admit that the picture of the baby was a plastic model .... You're a bald faced liar for even putting that on here.

PaleRider · #9 (**permalink**) 03-31-2008, 05:36 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Lexi

And I'm still waiting for you to admit that the picture of the baby was a plastic model .... You're a bald faced liar for even putting that on here.

I never said that it wasn't lexi. How stupid are you? I clearly said that the picture was what a child looked like between 10 and 12 weeks, not that it was an actual dead child.

Here is a link to the post.

http://www.arguewitheveryone.com/347769-post61.html

As you can see, I said:

Quote:

Originally Posted by palerider

[I ]Well, you have day 5 to 12 covered. A trimester, however, lasts 3 months. Here is what the child looks like between week 10 and 12. At 8 to 10 weeks, when most abortions are performed the child looks very much the same, only smaller. Which part of that doesn't look like a baby to you?

If this is really the best you can do, then you have done nothing but prove once again how stupid you are. If you believe you read somewhere that I said that it was a picture of an actual child rather than what a child looked like at that age, then that would be a product of your own inability to read and not anything that I posted. The picture was posted as a direct response to a deliberate lie that you told in picture form when you posted a picture of a blastosphere claiming that it represented the first trimester here:

http://www.arguewitheveryone.com/347738-post60.html

I don't need to lie to make my point lexi. The facts support me, and I am still waiting for you to bring forward any scientific fact that I have twisted. That accusation was a lie on your part as well.

Lexi · #10 (**permalink**) 03-31-2008, 05:49 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by PaleRider

I never said that it wasn't lexi. How stupid are you? I clearly said that the picture was what a child looked like between 10 and 12 weeks, not that it was an actual dead child.

Here is a link to the post.

http://www.arguewitheveryone.com/347769-post61.html

As you can see, I said:

If this is really the best you can do, then you have done nothing but prove once again how stupid you are. If you believe you read somewhere that I said that it was a picture of an actual child rather than what a child looked like at that age, then that would be a product of your own inability to read and not anything that I posted. The picture was posted as a direct response to a deliberate lie that you told in picture form when you posted a picture of a blastosphere claiming that it represented the first trimester here:

http://www.arguewitheveryone.com/347738-post60.html

I don't need to lie to make my point lexi. The facts support me, and I am still waiting for you to bring forward any scientific fact that I have twisted. That accusation was a lie on your part as well.

Not as stupid as you seem to want everyone to believe Pale or I wouldn't be able to see through all your lies and hypocrisy.

You used the picture to mislead people on what the actual facts are and to say anything else just makes you even more of a liar than you already were.