There was not even an attempt to deflect the logic of the Legal System declaring gestating animal life as "alive" and worth protecting and human gestation as "non life" and worthless. Of course, everyone very well knows that a gestating baby is an example of human life, and it is nothing short of murder to abort it. And its strange also, the lack of cognation to logic in your argument that before the act of sex....it is a "shared" responsibility for both the man and women as per the fact of the "protected" sex, because its "HIS" sperm that must be shielded. But, I'll be damned, here comes another "invisible" wall that comes up right after the act of sex and what once was "shared" now becomes the "sole property" of only the female....when she is considering "murdering the infant", its seems that this INVISIBLE SHIELD JUST sprang up stops the "male" from having any parental rights whatsoever in the "decision" that very well holds the life of "his" son/daughter in the balance.

Can anyone figure or keep up with any "female" and her imagined RIGHTS? As I said, hell the US Court Systems have tried but the women have even made them look like total idiots. As I said, the same Federal Court that declares a gestating "egg" of the American Bald Eagle alive and declares to protect the life thereof at any cost......have sided with the Female illogical claim that a "gestating human" holds no consideration where life is concerned. This just shows an example of the "political power" that feminine Nazism holds in this nation. As they now have even our legal systems making decisions on emotional ranting while completely ignoring "provable science" and factual evidence that can prove that a gestating child is not the sole property of the female only because that gestating child "shares" the DNA of both the male and the female, which in fact makes that gestating life...."AN INDIVIDUAL", not a thing nor a piece of property. The "stupidity" of both the American Female and American Court System must each have two "X" Chromosomes. BD

Therein lies the problem. When you start issuing, and protecting, imagined rights, practically any sort of imagined logic is sufficient to protect them. Since they are not based on sound logic to begin with, one really can't, or shouildn't expect sound logic or reason in their defense.

__________________
"It's not alive, It's not alive, It's not alive. Because I said it isnt', there's your proof jerk." ...lexi

"As far as your logical fallicy shit - shove it. I am a woman."...naturemomma

I still can not conclude as to what source the US Supreme Court draws upon that gives them the right to opine any case and "NOT" consider factual evidence, even to the point of "accepting" emotional evidence while ignoring physical evidence. IT SURE AS HELL DOES NOT DRAW UPON THE CONSTITUTION for any opinion that considers a gestating child as "non human". This is the "very reason" that the Femi-Nazi's are fighting so hard to stop any new claim from reaching the Supreme Court to challenge Roe. V. Wade, they very well know that "Science" and technology can and will prove beyond any shadow of a doubt that a gestating child is an "individual" life, and not property. As DNA is already precedented in the fact of "confirming" parenthood in the US Court System, and this same technology will sink Roe V. Wade and the feminine wave of fascism that it crested on, when the "male" DNA shows up in the gestating child and establishes parenthood and rights for the male. The right case will come along and finally put and end to these Nazi death camps that the feminists call "planned parenthood" centers. BD

if the law allowed them the right to have an abortion, but they must lose their own life at the same time?

It is very easy to argue for abortion if you lose nothing......

It is very easy to say that you have decided to end a chance for someone to live if it does not cause your life to be ended as well....

I suggest that a womans life be terminated after an abortion by one of three methods....

suctioning out her brains.....

Not allowing her food until she starves

Not allowing her water....

Maybe if we suctioned out some womens brains on national Television....

Which is exactly what they believe they have a right to do....

Maybe the thoughts on this would change....

I would bet that these femenists would stop running to the clinics in such large numbers....

Ya know, if it caust them their lives...

Viking

Suction out the brains of illiterate Republicant pseudoChristian whackjobs.

They ain't using them, and resources are limited.

Not to mention the rather large, and growing, body of legal precedent for the personhood of the unborn. There are people sitting in jail today having been charged, tried and sentenced separately for the death of an unborn in addition to killing the mother. In this country, you can't even be charged for murder or manslaughter, much less tried and convicted unless you have, in fact, killed a person. I don't know if the court had the establishment for legal precedent for the personhood of the unborn in mind when they first sentenced someone to prison for killing an unborn, but the precedent is undeniably established.

__________________
"It's not alive, It's not alive, It's not alive. Because I said it isnt', there's your proof jerk." ...lexi

"As far as your logical fallicy shit - shove it. I am a woman."...naturemomma

lexi the way you stick to the abortion forum makes me think you're an aborted fetus on a revenge mission

Stop stalking me you faggot troll..

I am telling you, she is here to expiate her own guilt.

__________________
"It's not alive, It's not alive, It's not alive. Because I said it isnt', there's your proof jerk." ...lexi

"As far as your logical fallicy shit - shove it. I am a woman."...naturemomma