 |
|

03-07-2008, 07:05 AM
|
 |
Machiavelli Incarnate
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: On the Beach
Posts: 3,064
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by PaleRider
So you want to erase all laws from the books so that we can all really do as we please anytime, anywhere, anyhow, and to anyone? Is that really what you want? Or do you really like having a society that is structured and kept reasonably orderly by laws but you really just don't want this particular law. You are fine with having laws that protect you and your rights but just don't want the rights of those particular human beings protected.
You aren't fooling anyone lexi. State your position honestly and I will have no argument with it.
|
Are you really that thick headed or just pretending to be. We're talking about ONE issue only here and has to do with a womans body being her own. If that's to hard for you to understand then I'm wasting my time.
|

03-07-2008, 11:59 AM
|
 |
Machiavelli Incarnate
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 3,831
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Lexi
Are you really that thick headed or just pretending to be. We're talking about ONE issue only here and has to do with a womans body being her own. If that's to hard for you to understand then I'm wasting my time.
|
You said:
"I only want every person to have the right to think for themselves and live their lives the way they want to, not how some nutcases tell them they have to. Unlike you, I believe we should all think for ourselves and do what's best for our OWN lives."
You describe a society in which laws don't exist. You describe a society in which you decide what is best for you and you do it without regard for anyone or anything else. You describe a society in which each individual is number 1 and only acts in accordance with what is best for number 1. Is that really the sort of society you want to live in?
Or, as I suspect, you are perfectly fine with laws that protect your own rights but are not fine with laws that protect the rights of unborn human beings as if you were somehow more deserving of the right to live than they without having ever proved that you are more deserving.
__________________
"It's not alive, It's not alive, It's not alive. Because I said it isnt', there's your proof jerk." ...lexi
"As far as your logical fallicy shit - shove it. I am a woman."...naturemomma
|

03-07-2008, 03:40 PM
|
 |
Machiavelli Incarnate
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: On the Beach
Posts: 3,064
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by PaleRider
You said:
"I only want every person to have the right to think for themselves and live their lives the way they want to, not how some nutcases tell them they have to. Unlike you, I believe we should all think for ourselves and do what's best for our OWN lives."
You describe a society in which laws don't exist. You describe a society in which you decide what is best for you and you do it without regard for anyone or anything else. You describe a society in which each individual is number 1 and only acts in accordance with what is best for number 1. Is that really the sort of society you want to live in?
Or, as I suspect, you are perfectly fine with laws that protect your own rights but are not fine with laws that protect the rights of unborn human beings as if you were somehow more deserving of the right to live than they without having ever proved that you are more deserving.
|
What part of , "we're talking about ONE ISSUE ONLY here don't you understand??? 
|

03-07-2008, 03:44 PM
|
 |
Machiavelli Incarnate
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 3,831
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Lexi
What part of , "we're talking about ONE ISSUE ONLY here don't you understand??? 
|
The problem is that unless you can prove that we are something other than living human beings from the time we are concieved, any argument made for killing them without legal consequence must also apply to killing everyone else without legal consequence. Unless you can prove that they aren't part of we, you are operating in the realm of logical fallacy.
__________________
"It's not alive, It's not alive, It's not alive. Because I said it isnt', there's your proof jerk." ...lexi
"As far as your logical fallicy shit - shove it. I am a woman."...naturemomma
|

03-07-2008, 03:49 PM
|
 |
Machiavelli Incarnate
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: On the Beach
Posts: 3,064
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by PaleRider
The problem is that unless you can prove that we are something other than living human beings from the time we are concieved, any argument made for killing them without legal consequence must also apply to killing everyone else without legal consequence. Unless you can prove that they aren't part of we, you are operating in the realm of logical fallacy.
|
Your wrong again old boy... A sac of blood and cells is not a living human being so there goes your theory out the window. We are not human beings from the time we're conceived . Comparing apples and oranges in this catagory won't work Pale.
|

03-07-2008, 05:27 PM
|
 |
Machiavelli Incarnate
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 3,831
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Lexi
Your wrong again old boy... A sac of blood and cells is not a living human being so there goes your theory out the window. We are not human beings from the time we're conceived . Comparing apples and oranges in this catagory won't work Pale.
|
I keep asking you to prove it and no proof comes. You just bloviate. I have provided plenty of credible science that says we are human beings from conception and you have provided exactly squat to counter it.
As it stands, we are human beings from conception because you haven't proved otherwise. Denying credible science doesn't reduce its credibility in the least.
__________________
"It's not alive, It's not alive, It's not alive. Because I said it isnt', there's your proof jerk." ...lexi
"As far as your logical fallicy shit - shove it. I am a woman."...naturemomma
|

03-07-2008, 10:22 PM
|
|
Machiavelli Incarnate
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 4,455
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by PaleRider
I keep asking you to prove it and no proof comes. You just bloviate. I have provided plenty of credible science that says we are human beings from conception and you have provided exactly squat to counter it.
As it stands, we are human beings from conception because you haven't proved otherwise. Denying credible science doesn't reduce its credibility in the least.
|
Look you pale mike jackson lookalike, there is no way you can speak for somebody that hasn't been born yet so STFU, death is the answer
__________________
You can never dent spiderwebs
|

03-08-2008, 12:38 AM
|
 |
Political Novice
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 8
|
|
The husbands rights
Unless the husband wants to carry the fetus he has no right (Quote)
Excuse me but hello we produced the sperm 26 of those chromosomes are ours! with out it you wouldnt have the baby giving the men rights to to decide.
|

03-08-2008, 12:50 AM
|
|
Machiavelli Incarnate
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 4,455
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by soccerstudmg
The husbands rights
Unless the husband wants to carry the fetus he has no right (Quote)
Excuse me but hello we produced the sperm 26 of those chromosomes are ours! with out it you wouldnt have the baby giving the men rights to to decide.
|
Quote them more directly bro, you got these half ass fags
__________________
You can never dent spiderwebs
|

03-08-2008, 12:58 AM
|
|
Political Mastermind
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 1,398
|
|
the question isnt is abortion right, its is abortion funny......... and the answer is yes
|
| Thread Tools |
|
|
| Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
|