 |
|

03-26-2008, 04:37 PM
|
|
Political Mastermind
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Connecticut
Posts: 1,052
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by PaleRider
Your right to not be inconvenienced doesn't outweigh another human being's right to live and you are going to have a rude awakening when the supreme court says exactly that
|
Inconvenience, nothing. Pregnancy and childbirth are life altering experiences. If that human being wants to live, tell him/er to go somewhere else. Better yet, you provide for the move.
|

03-26-2008, 04:48 PM
|
 |
Machiavelli Incarnate
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 3,831
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by marmalade6
Inconvenience, nothing. Pregnancy and childbirth are life altering experiences. If that human being wants to live, tell him/er to go somewhere else. Better yet, you provide for the move.
|
I provided the definition of convenience and then asked any of you pro choicers to name a situation in which a woman's life or long term health was not in danger that didn't amount to convenience. So far, none of you have named such a situation. Here is the definition of convenience:
convenience - n -
1. the quality of being convenient.
2. anything that saves or simplifies work, adds to one's ease or comfort, etc.
3. a convenient situation or time.
4. advantage or accommodation
Maybe you would now like to describe a situation in which the mother's life or long term health is not in danger that doesn't amount to convenience.
By the way. You wanted to talk philosophy so I waxed philosophical. I am a bit dissappointed that you don't seem to want to take up that conversation either.
__________________
"It's not alive, It's not alive, It's not alive. Because I said it isnt', there's your proof jerk." ...lexi
"As far as your logical fallicy shit - shove it. I am a woman."...naturemomma
Last edited by PaleRider; 03-26-2008 at 04:51 PM.
|

03-26-2008, 05:48 PM
|
 |
Machiavelli Incarnate
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: On the Beach
Posts: 3,064
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by PaleRider
I provided the definition of convenience and then asked any of you pro choicers to name a situation in which a woman's life or long term health was not in danger that didn't amount to convenience. So far, none of you have named such a situation. Here is the definition of convenience:
convenience - n -
1. the quality of being convenient.
2. anything that saves or simplifies work, adds to one's ease or comfort, etc.
3. a convenient situation or time.
4. advantage or accommodation
Maybe you would now like to describe a situation in which the mother's life or long term health is not in danger that doesn't amount to convenience.
By the way. You wanted to talk philosophy so I waxed philosophical. I am a bit dissappointed that you don't seem to want to take up that conversation either.
|
All you've provided so far are a bunch of words that pro life scientists have concocted to make people believe their lies. They've been lying since the "coat hanger " theory, remember.... 
__________________
"its potential, its potential, its potential because I said so, there's your proof" --- Palerider
|

03-26-2008, 07:08 PM
|
|
Political Mastermind
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Connecticut
Posts: 1,052
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by PaleRider
1. Hell, accusing me of being a bible thumper is a lie marmalade. There are others but I am not going to go back and bring them here.
2. Calling them zefs doesn't change what they are marmalade. That is another lie. When you use words in an attempt to dehumanize a human being, you are no different at all than a racist who uses racial epithets in an attempt to dehumanize blacks. No different at all.
3. Nope. I used to be pro choice. What happened to me was that I encountered someone who had an argument that I couldn't defeat. No matter what argument I put foreward simply looked stupid when contrasted against hard fact. I spent more time than I care to admit pouring through volumes in several medical school libraries looking for something with which to make a rational rebuttal. I didn't find any because there is none.
That left me with a few options. I could continue to throw out stupid arguments of the sort that you and the other pro choicers throw out knowing that they were vapid and hollow or I could state my position at that time honestly and say that I favored allowing women to kill their children without legal consequence for any or no reason, or I could accept the truth and modify my positon accordingly.
4. You say I have baggage. Tell me about my baggage. We all have it, and I have mine as well. I brought what little I carry back from vietnam. I would be interested to know how my experiences there have any bearing on the fact that abortion denies human beings their most basic right.
5. I was making the point that newborns don't exercise any of their rights either although the do have them. Newborns aren't anything that they weren't before they were born except a little older and a bit more mature. Human beings have an inalenable right to live. To date, you haven't provided any credible evidence that suggests that unborns aren't human beings.
|
1. Why then do you know enough Bible to recall or locate applicable biblical phrases to enhanse your arguements?
2. It is no different than your attempt to glorify the unborn, and increase it's appeal and status to that of a rosie child.
And, how would you explain the difference between a difference of opinion and a lie?
3. Why couldn't you modify your position to include abortion during the first trimester? You studied the zef's brain connections and inability to function. Why are your arguements so black and white?
4. Does this explanation really answer for the passion you display toward the subject. You have been fighting against abortion for years, here and on other sites. Your arguements have become pat and inflexible. What is driving you?
5. Probably because I don't consider the zef any different from another animal at the same stage.
|

03-26-2008, 07:23 PM
|
|
Political Mastermind
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Connecticut
Posts: 1,052
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by PaleRider
I provided the definition of convenience and then asked any of you pro choicers to name a situation in which a woman's life or long term health was not in danger that didn't amount to convenience. So far, none of you have named such a situation. Here is the definition of convenience:
convenience - n -
1. the quality of being convenient.
2. anything that saves or simplifies work, adds to one's ease or comfort, etc.
3. a convenient situation or time.
4. advantage or accommodation
Maybe you would now like to describe a situation in which the mother's life or long term health is not in danger that doesn't amount to convenience.
By the way. You wanted to talk philosophy so I waxed philosophical. I am a bit dissappointed that you don't seem to want to take up that conversation either.
|
If one struggled to keep grades high enough to get into med. school, and is working to pay for med. school, but becomes pregnant, and must now pay the cost of raising a child, which the male could have just as easily afforded but wants nothing to do with, and she no longer has the wherewithall to achieve her dream. That is far more than an inconvenience.
Yes, you did wax philosophical and you gave us much to think about and to read. I will get to it.
|

03-26-2008, 08:34 PM
|
 |
Machiavelli Incarnate
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 3,831
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by marmalade6
1. Why then do you know enough Bible to recall or locate applicable biblical phrases to enhanse your arguements?
|
I could also make an argument from the Koran, the Talmud, the Tao te ching, or the Bhagavad Gita and the beginnings of an argument from the Veda. I have studied philosophy at length.
Quote:
Originally Posted by marmalade6
2. It is no different than your attempt to glorify the unborn, and increase it's appeal and status to that of a rosie child.
|
I don't attempt to make something of them that they are not but by the same token, I don't attempt to deny what they are.
Quote:
Originally Posted by marmalade6
And, how would you explain the difference between a difference of opinion and a lie?
|
An opinion is a position that one holds on grounds that are insufficient to produce certainty while a lie is a false statement made with the deliberate intent to decieve.
Quote:
Originally Posted by marmalade6
3.. Why couldn't you modify your position to include abortion during the first trimester? You studied the zef's brain connections and inability to function. Why are your arguements so black and white?
|
Because to do so would make me a hypocrite. They are nothing after the first trimester than they weren't during the first except older and more mature. I gave you a fairly comprehensive explanation in the thread on philosophical concepts. It isn't our brain that makes us human beings. As I explained, personhood is a matter of kind vs a matter of degree. You can do any number of things to make yourself a better or worse person, but you can do nothing to make yourself more or less a person. Personhood isn't something that we aquire since things aquired may be lost. Person describes the kind of creature you are, not the degree to which you have achieved anything.
Quote:
Originally Posted by marmalade6
4. Does this explanation really answer for the passion you display toward the subject. You have been fighting against abortion for years, here and on other sites. Your arguements have become pat and inflexible. What is driving you?
|
You were the one who suggested that I have baggage that has anything at all to do with this topic. I don't. Odd that you suggest that I have "passion" at this point; haven't you accused me of being cold and heartless? It would seem that passion from one who is cold and heartless is a contradiction in terms.
Quote:
Originally Posted by marmalade6
5. Probably because I don't consider the zef any different from another animal at the same stage.
|
Your opinion is meaningless in the face of hard facts to the contrary. Holding an opinion that flies in the face of fact is evidence of a slow, cumbersome, and inflexible mind.
__________________
"It's not alive, It's not alive, It's not alive. Because I said it isnt', there's your proof jerk." ...lexi
"As far as your logical fallicy shit - shove it. I am a woman."...naturemomma
|

03-26-2008, 08:38 PM
|
 |
Machiavelli Incarnate
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 3,831
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by marmalade6
If one struggled to keep grades high enough to get into med. school, and is working to pay for med. school, but becomes pregnant, and must now pay the cost of raising a child, which the male could have just as easily afforded but wants nothing to do with, and she no longer has the wherewithall to achieve her dream. That is far more than an inconvenience.
Yes, you did wax philosophical and you gave us much to think about and to read. I will get to it.
|
See definition 3. A convenient situation or time.
I don't make up the definitons, but the words mean what they mean. You describe an action of convenience. Killing the child is simply easier than not killing it. If school is her primary concern and the most important thing in her life, why exactly did she take the chance of becoming pregnant. She is in med school after all, doesn't she know the inherent risks?
__________________
"It's not alive, It's not alive, It's not alive. Because I said it isnt', there's your proof jerk." ...lexi
"As far as your logical fallicy shit - shove it. I am a woman."...naturemomma
|

03-26-2008, 09:28 PM
|
 |
Political Junkie
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: I go where the jellyfish are plentiful and the air burns like a whore's rash.
Posts: 300
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by marmalade6
If one struggled to keep grades high enough to get into med. school, and is working to pay for med. school, but becomes pregnant, and must now pay the cost of raising a child, which the male could have just as easily afforded but wants nothing to do with, and she no longer has the wherewithall to achieve her dream. That is far more than an inconvenience.
Yes, you did wax philosophical and you gave us much to think about and to read. I will get to it.
|
Many many mistakes made here...
You CHOSE to fuck, but DECIDED you didn't want a baby. First mistake. Your medical training should have told you that those two aren't compatible decisions.
You CHOSE a guy who bailed when you got pregnant. It doesn't take professional psychologist to get to know a guy well enough to see what kind of man he is. You yourself should have been the first clue...he was the kind of guy who was willing to fuck you without any committment to prepare for the possibility of an accidental child. The fact that he was willing to fuck you in those circumstances should have told you he was not responsible.
You CHOSE to pursue education to the (apparent) exclusion of a family. That decision, combined with the decision to go through the act of making a baby whether or not you wanted one, put you in the imaginary position where you believe your self-pursuits are more important than the debt you now owe this new life.
No matter when you think life starts...(as if there was some way you could combine clusters of living cells to create...dead tissue...? But you're in medical school, so you know that's not possible. There is ACTUAL LIFE inside that you created.)...anyway, no matter when it starts, it NEVER chooses to start. You chose that, all by yourself. Part of being Big Boys and Big Girls is that we take responsibility for our choices.
Now...here's the part a lot of people have trouble wrapping their heads around, so I'll use simple words: When you are a big girl, and you have to take responsibility (that means you owe something to someone) for your acts, always remember: grownups should always try to fulfill their debts by NOT killing stuff.
I know it's complicated, so I'll break it down even further for your specific situation:
When you chose to make a baby, you created what you see as a choice...
You could KILL something and pretend you made good choices, and finish school.
Or, you could NOT kill stuff, wait nine months, and finish school.
So...why do you seem to gravitate toward the KILLING STUFF choice, when BOTH options still allow you to finish school...as if a piece of sheepskin was SOOOO precious that it blurs in value when compared to a human life? And if you choose to not kill stuff, and still are unable to fight your selfish streak, then let someone who MIGHT love the baby have it, and you still get your sheepskin without KILLING STUFF.
You could NOT kill something and stop making irresponsible choices. Then later, you could still finish school.
In every step of the way, you made choices to suit yourself that led to the creation of a baby. Can you not make just ONE choice for the baby and let it live? Not even for nine months, after which you can go fuck more deadbeats and make more selfish choices all you like...? Why is it so hard to just let the baby live?
Last edited by SaintMalaclypse; 03-26-2008 at 09:30 PM.
|

03-26-2008, 11:21 PM
|
|
Political Mastermind
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Connecticut
Posts: 1,052
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by SaintMalaclypse
1. You CHOSE to fuck, but DECIDED you didn't want a baby. First mistake. Your medical training should have told you that those two aren't compatible decisions.
2. You CHOSE a guy who bailed when you got pregnant. It doesn't take professional psychologist to get to know a guy well enough to see what kind of man he is. You yourself should have been the first clue...he was the kind of guy who was willing to fuck you without any committment to prepare for the possibility of an accidental child. The fact that he was willing to fuck you in those circumstances should have told you he was not responsible.
3. You CHOSE to pursue education to the (apparent) exclusion of a family. That decision, combined with the decision to go through the act of making a baby whether or not you wanted one, put you in the imaginary position where you believe your self-pursuits are more important than the debt you now owe this new life.
4. No matter when you think life starts...(as if there was some way you could combine clusters of living cells to create...dead tissue...? But you're in medical school, so you know that's not possible. There is ACTUAL LIFE inside that you created.)...anyway, no matter when it starts, it NEVER chooses to start. You chose that, all by yourself. Part of being Big Boys and Big Girls is that we take responsibility for our choices.
5. Now...here's the part a lot of people have trouble wrapping their heads around, so I'll use simple words: When you are a big girl, and you have to take responsibility (that means you owe something to someone) for your acts, always remember: grownups should always try to fulfill their debts by NOT killing stuff.
6. I know it's complicated, so I'll break it down even further for your specific situation:
When you chose to make a baby, you created what you see as a choice...
You could KILL something and pretend you made good choices, and finish school.
Or, you could NOT kill stuff, wait nine months, and finish school.
7. So...why do you seem to gravitate toward the KILLING STUFF choice, when BOTH options still allow you to finish school...as if a piece of sheepskin was SOOOO precious that it blurs in value when compared to a human life? And if you choose to not kill stuff, and still are unable to fight your selfish streak, then let someone who MIGHT love the baby have it, and you still get your sheepskin without KILLING STUFF.
You could NOT kill something and stop making irresponsible choices. Then later, you could still finish school.
In every step of the way, you made choices to suit yourself that led to the creation of a baby. Can you not make just ONE choice for the baby and let it live? Not even for nine months, after which you can go fuck more deadbeats and make more selfish choices all you like...? Why is it so hard to just let the baby live?
|
1. Was working to save money for med. school. Only completed pre-med.
2. Sorry, but that statement is not true. Some people are chameleons, if they want something you have. Also, when one is dedicated and working hard toward a goal, one will easily become isolated and suseptible to less than genuine intentions from another.
3. You imply family is in position to help financially or to be useful. What if only family member is a destitute mom.
I can sure given more as a doctor than as an accidental mother.
4. Again, working to pay for med. school. Not there yet.
Yes, we do. Tell the boys!
5. And we hope that you and all of yours, live by this rule. But, you don't, do you.
6. Thank you, I'll kill the little bugger while it's brain synapses have not yet connected, and get on with this wonderful job of life. My genes are being passed on by my sibling's children, and I've no great desire to add to over-population.
7. Just playing devil's advocate.
But, your right. One could give up the babe for adoption and get back to work and school. But, those nine months of devotion and caring about nutrition, etc., cause ties to form. Adoption becomes another sweet decision one could regret terribly, later.
Last edited by marmalade6; 03-26-2008 at 11:24 PM.
|

03-27-2008, 12:11 AM
|
|
Political Mastermind
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Connecticut
Posts: 1,052
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by PaleRider
2. I don't attempt to make something of them that they are not but by the same token, I don't attempt to deny what they are.
An opinion is a position that one holds on grounds that are insufficient to produce certainty while a lie is a false statement made with the deliberate intent to decieve.
3.Because to do so would make me a hypocrite. They are nothing after the first trimester than they weren't during the first except older and more mature. I gave you a fairly comprehensive explanation in the thread on philosophical concepts. It isn't our brain that makes us human beings. As I explained, personhood is a matter of kind vs a matter of degree. You can do any number of things to make yourself a better or worse person, but you can do nothing to make yourself more or less a person. Personhood isn't something that we aquire since things aquired may be lost. Person describes the kind of creature you are, not the degree to which you have achieved anything.
4.You were the one who suggested that I have baggage that has anything at all to do with this topic. I don't. Odd that you suggest that I have "passion" at this point; haven't you accused me of being cold and heartless? It would seem that passion from one who is cold and heartless is a contradiction in terms.
5. Your opinion is meaningless in the face of hard facts to the contrary. Holding an opinion that flies in the face of fact is evidence of a slow, cumbersome, and inflexible mind.
|
2. They are not rosie children!
How can you so mistake a poster's motives by seeing "intent to lie" in all postings you disagree with or that disagree with you. I think "opinion" is basically what we reply with. Maybe you attribute too much knowledge to ea. of us, or think that your writings are wholy adsorbed and digested.
Repeatedly identifying other's posting as "a lie" effectively belittles their efforts, instead of teaching or convincing them of new concepts.
3. It would not make you a hypocrite. Acknowledging the many shades of grey in an arguement is to recognize the improbability of certainty, and the imperfections in scientific observation, which often need reformulating.
4. No. Something is carrying you along and I choose to call it passion (I don't think you'd appreciate 'God's work'). And, though I've seen others do so, I don't recall ever even thinking of you as cold and heartless.
5. Yes, I become a slow, cumbersome drudge when someone tries to convince me of something I'm not ready to think or believe. And, something that is not in women's best interests.
Last edited by marmalade6; 03-27-2008 at 12:19 AM.
|
| Thread Tools |
|
|
| Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
|