 |
|

02-26-2008, 02:16 PM
|
 |
Machiavelli Incarnate
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 3,831
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Lexi
When you're trying to take away another persons rights EVERYTHING YOU DO IS RELEVENT. If you don't want to walk the walk , then don't talk the talk.
Take those babies into your home and raise them, that's what people that really cared about them would do. Guess that proves my point that it's all about control with you fanatics.
|
Sorry, it isn't. By asking what any particular person does to help chldren, you are attempting to place them on the horns of a false dilemma. That is a logical fallacy. It is like asking if one is in a burning building and one sees a an embryo in liquid nitrogen and a toddler and one can only take one out, which would you choose. The answer is meaningless because either choice results in a human being burning.
What I do or don't do, or what anyone else does or does not do is irrelavent to the fact that human beings are being denied their right to live.
__________________
"It's not alive, It's not alive, It's not alive. Because I said it isnt', there's your proof jerk." ...lexi
"As far as your logical fallicy shit - shove it. I am a woman."...naturemomma
|

02-26-2008, 05:28 PM
|
 |
Machiavelli Incarnate
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: On the Beach
Posts: 3,064
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by PaleRider
Sorry, it isn't. By asking what any particular person does to help chldren, you are attempting to place them on the horns of a false dilemma. That is a logical fallacy. It is like asking if one is in a burning building and one sees a an embryo in liquid nitrogen and a toddler and one can only take one out, which would you choose. The answer is meaningless because either choice results in a human being burning.
What I do or don't do, or what anyone else does or does not do is irrelavent to the fact that human beings are being denied their right to live.
|
Yes, it is... If you can take away a womans right then you MUST provide for the babies you FORCE these women to have. If not then you are denying these human beings the "food" they need to sustain life..
Very compassionate aren't you? 
|

02-26-2008, 05:33 PM
|
 |
Machiavelli Incarnate
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: On the Beach
Posts: 3,064
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by PaleRider
More lies. If your position were based on human rights, then you must admit that the right to live outweighs an implied right to privacy.
And there is no right to kill one's child listed in the constitution. Not in mine anyway. Maybe you can point it out in yours.
|
The only lies are coming from you. That is based on what each individual believes is a human being. You seem to think "It's my way or the highway" , well YO DAWG, you lose... 
|

02-26-2008, 05:49 PM
|
 |
Machiavelli Incarnate
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 3,831
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Lexi
Yes, it is... If you can take away a womans right then you MUST provide for the babies you FORCE these women to have. If not then you are denying these human beings the "food" they need to sustain life..
Very compassionate aren't you? 
|
My compassion has nothing to do with children being denied their most basic human right.
Sorry if you can't see through your logical fallacy. Don't worry, I never expected that you would. That is just your style. Logical fallacy, denial of the truth, and incoherent argument.
__________________
"It's not alive, It's not alive, It's not alive. Because I said it isnt', there's your proof jerk." ...lexi
"As far as your logical fallicy shit - shove it. I am a woman."...naturemomma
|

02-26-2008, 05:54 PM
|
 |
Machiavelli Incarnate
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: On the Beach
Posts: 3,064
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by PaleRider
My compassion has nothing to do with children being denied their most basic human right.
Sorry if you can't see through your logical fallacy. Don't worry, I never expected that you would. That is just your style. Logical fallacy, denial of the truth, and incoherent argument.
|
You simply have NO compassion at all .. And I'm sorry also that you can't get your sorry behind out of the box and start seeing the whole big picture but like I said before, it's to late for you.. I never deny the truth, that's why you start with the "logical fallacy, denial" crap. You're a loser Pale and always will be one. 
|

02-26-2008, 05:55 PM
|
 |
Machiavelli Incarnate
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 3,831
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Lexi
The only lies are coming from you. That is based on what each individual believes is a human being. You seem to think "It's my way or the highway" , well YO DAWG, you lose... 
|
Are you really not able to see the flaw in that line of reasoning? "what each individual believes is a human being". Individuals don't get to decide what is and isn't a human being. If that were true, you could kill anyone and claim that you "decided" that that person wasn't actually a human being.
The court decided roe on the basis that unborns were not actually human beings but in the majority decision, Justice Blackmun acknowedged that if personhood were ever established for the unborn that roe would fall since unborns, as persons would be entitled to the protection of the 14th amendment.
Well, personhood has been established. I have provided you the text of the law that allows one who kills an unborn in the commission of a federal crime to be charged and sentenced for killing an unborn. You can not be charged or sentenced for either murder or manslaughter in this country unless you have killed a person. I don't think that the courts really meant to establish the personhood of the unborn, but they have done it none the less.
Roe will be overturned on this basis and because unborns will be entitled to the protection of the 14th amendment, no state will allow abortion unless the mother's life is in danger.
The fact that you are in denial of all this does not change the reality at all. In truth, I prefer that people like you remain in denial. That way, when roe is struck down, the shock will be much greater.
__________________
"It's not alive, It's not alive, It's not alive. Because I said it isnt', there's your proof jerk." ...lexi
"As far as your logical fallicy shit - shove it. I am a woman."...naturemomma
|

02-26-2008, 05:59 PM
|
 |
Machiavelli Incarnate
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 3,831
|
|
[quote=PaleRider;321350]
Quote:
Originally Posted by Lexi
You simply have NO compassion at all .. And I'm sorry also that you can't get your sorry behind out of the box and start seeing the whole big picture but like I said before, it's to late for you..
|
I got out of the box a long time ago and started working towards seeing roe overturned. All these past years, people like you are the ones who have been in the box. Believing that the status quo is forever.
Quote:
Originally Posted by marmalade6
I never deny the truth, that's why you start with the "logical fallacy, denial" crap. You're a loser Pale and always will be one. 
|
You never deny the truth? Are you kidding?
"It's not alive, It's not alive, It's not alive. Because I said it isnt', there's your proof jerk."
That is one of the biggest denials of the truth that I have ever seen. Your entire position is a denial of the truth, and one logical fallacy after another.
__________________
"It's not alive, It's not alive, It's not alive. Because I said it isnt', there's your proof jerk." ...lexi
"As far as your logical fallicy shit - shove it. I am a woman."...naturemomma
|

02-26-2008, 06:00 PM
|
 |
Machiavelli Incarnate
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: On the Beach
Posts: 3,064
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by PaleRider
Are you really not able to see the flaw in that line of reasoning? "what each individual believes is a human being". Individuals don't get to decide what is and isn't a human being. If that were true, you could kill anyone and claim that you "decided" that that person wasn't actually a human being.
The court decided roe on the basis that unborns were not actually human beings but in the majority decision, Justice Blackmun acknowedged that if personhood were ever established for the unborn that roe would fall since unborns, as persons would be entitled to the protection of the 14th amendment.
Well, personhood has been established. I have provided you the text of the law that allows one who kills an unborn in the commission of a federal crime to be charged and sentenced for killing an unborn. You can not be charged or sentenced for either murder or manslaughter in this country unless you have killed a person. I don't think that the courts really meant to establish the personhood of the unborn, but they have done it none the less.
Roe will be overturned on this basis and because unborns will be entitled to the protection of the 14th amendment, no state will allow abortion unless the mother's life is in danger.
The fact that you are in denial of all this does not change the reality at all. In truth, I prefer that people like you remain in denial. That way, when roe is struck down, the shock will be much greater.
|
Now you're saying anyone that doesn't believe the same way you do has "flawed thinking" .. Get over yourself Pale... We aren't talking about People that have already been born, we're talking about blood and cells in a sac so stop trying to twist everything around , won't work with me old boy.
Roe will NOT be overturned and if it is NOT all states will follow this law. Geeezzz Pale, you seem to think we live in a dictatorship already. Get a grip DAWG... The only one in denial is you... 
|

02-26-2008, 06:02 PM
|
 |
Machiavelli Incarnate
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: On the Beach
Posts: 3,064
|
|
[quote=PaleRider;321360]
Quote:
Originally Posted by PaleRider
I got out of the box a long time ago and started working towards seeing roe overturned. All these past years, people like you are the ones who have been in the box. Believing that the status quo is forever.
You never deny the truth? Are you kidding?
"It's not alive, It's not alive, It's not alive. Because I said it isnt', there's your proof jerk."
That is one of the biggest denials of the truth that I have ever seen. Your entire position is a denial of the truth, and one logical fallacy after another.
|
Still screaming for attention aren't ya??? When someone does that it just proves that they know they've lost the battle.. LOL
|

02-26-2008, 06:19 PM
|
 |
Machiavelli Incarnate
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 3,831
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Lexi
Now you're saying anyone that doesn't believe the same way you do has "flawed thinking" .. Get over yourself Pale... We aren't talking about People that have already been born, we're talking about blood and cells in a sac so stop trying to twist everything around , won't work with me old boy.
|
When you attempt to dehumanize a human being through the use of "descriptive" language you are no different than a racist who attempts to dehumanize blacks by using words like ni%ger and coon. The difference between pre natals and post natals is nothing more than a level of maturity.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Lexi
Roe will NOT be overturned and if it is NOT all states will follow this law. Geeezzz Pale, you seem to think we live in a dictatorship already. Get a grip DAWG... The only one in denial is you... 
|
If the court says that unborns are human beings and therefore persons, and are entitled to the protection of the 14th amendment, then all states will be required to restrict abortion to the degree that the court says they will restrict it.
When the court that decided roe said that unborns were not human beings and therefore not entitled to the protection of the 14th amendment, every state had to allow abortion whether they liked it or not. Why do you believe it would be any different when roe is overturned?
As to whether or not roe will be overturned, maybe you should take a look at this. It is from CNN, not some far right wing site. These people are pro choicers but the difference between them and you is that they are not in denial. They see the facts for what they are.
Video - Breaking News Videos from CNN.com
Justices uphold ban on abortion procedure - CNN.com
Here is a quote from Justice Ginsburg:
In a bitter dissent read from the bench, Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg, the only woman on the high court, said the majority's opinion "cannot be understood as anything other than an effort to chip away a right declared again and again by this court, and with increasing comprehension of its centrality to women's lives."
She called the ruling "alarming" and noted the conservative majority "tolerates, indeed applauds, federal intervention to ban nationwide a procedure found necessary and proper in certain cases" by doctor's groups, including gyncecologists.
This a supreme court justice lexi. She certainly sees the writing on the wall even if you aren't able to. She knows that the court is now conservative and is going to be conservative for a very long time and she knows that they are waiting for the cases to come in so that they can further restrict abortion.
Kid yourself all you like. If mental masturbation is how you get through the day, help yourself. It doesn't change the facts though, but when a pro choice supreme court justice tells you that roe is in trouble, you really should listen.
__________________
"It's not alive, It's not alive, It's not alive. Because I said it isnt', there's your proof jerk." ...lexi
"As far as your logical fallicy shit - shove it. I am a woman."...naturemomma
|
| Thread Tools |
|
|
| Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
|