Argue With Everyone Political Forums  

Go Back   Argue With Everyone Political Forums > Specific Political Issues > Abortion

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #61 (permalink)  
Old 05-22-2008, 01:00 PM
PaleRider's Avatar
Machiavelli Incarnate
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 3,831
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by naturemomma View Post
Hey look paleface, there's you bringing pain into the argument...
More name calling? Is that really the best you can do?

I was responding to wolf's statement. I have never tried to claim that the ability to feel or the inability to feel had anything at all to do with being a living human being. I am not casting about for a reason that sounds plausible to allow women to kill their children.

Quote:
Originally Posted by naturemomma View Post
And for the record, the research I posted was by the American Pain Society, they do not perform abortions, dipshit!!!!
They simply print research. One must look at the doctors who do the research and it is very interesting to note that those from your link who are most vocal in denying that unborns feel pain are psychologists and psychiatrists and not neurologists. The psychologists, by the way aren't arguing that the chid does not feel pain but that it doesn't have a pain "experience". Experience meaning that the pain is not being interpreted in a conscious manner. They are pushing a biopsychosocial model of interpreting pain which is little more than new age babbling. Biomedical science which is the accepted science does not agree.

Quote:
Originally Posted by naturemomma View Post
Here's the study....
You will note that in your own study, they admit physical, stress, and hormonal responses from unborns as early as 7.5 weeks and then proceed to suggest that because the child can't "think" about the pain that the pain doesn't exist. Psychobable.
__________________
"It's not alive, It's not alive, It's not alive. Because I said it isnt', there's your proof jerk." ...lexi

"As far as your logical fallicy shit - shove it. I am a woman."...naturemomma
Reply With Quote
  #62 (permalink)  
Old 05-22-2008, 01:07 PM
PaleRider's Avatar
Machiavelli Incarnate
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 3,831
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by naturemomma View Post
You are the one claiming that the fetus is seperate from it's mother.... If 'it' is so seperate, then why can't a fetus live outside of her body?
Are you really this stupid or are you just being obtuse because it is easier than admitting that you really have no actual argument? Why can't you live in a methane atmosphere? Why can't you live in a vaccum or under an atmospheric pressure of 10,000 psi? We require certain environments to live. Duh. Before being born, the child requires a certain sort of environment to live. That it requires a specific environment does not make it part of its mother, or not alive, or something other than a human being. Your arguments have all the depth of those of a child. Learn something on an adult level before you attempt to have an adult discussion.

Quote:
Originally Posted by naturemomma View Post
It can't. It's not seperate. The mothers body, in conjunction with fetus, turns into a host site for the fetus. It all works together to form a perfect union, one that the fetus cannot live without.
60 years ago polio was pretty common and there were those who, as a result of polio had to live out their lives in iron lungs. They simply couldn't live without them. Take them out and they would die. None of them were ever "part" of those machines. Being inside of, or dependent upon a thing does not make you "part" of that thing.

No one is suggesting that the child can live without its mother. But the fact that it requires her to live does not mean that it is part of her body any more than the fact that you require a certain sort of atmosphere means that you are part of that atmosphere. Your argument is flawed at the most basic level. This isn't about whether the child requires its mother to survive, it is about whether a woman has the right to kill a child because it is less than convenient.
__________________
"It's not alive, It's not alive, It's not alive. Because I said it isnt', there's your proof jerk." ...lexi

"As far as your logical fallicy shit - shove it. I am a woman."...naturemomma
Reply With Quote
  #63 (permalink)  
Old 05-22-2008, 09:42 PM
wolf_22's Avatar
Machiavelli Incarnate
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Chicago :D
Posts: 3,172
Smile

Quote:
Originally Posted by PaleRider View Post
According to the CDC, the gutmacher institute, and family planning, about 11% of all abortions are performed after week 14. That amounts to about 110,000 per year. Describe how 110,000 chidren per year dying in the agony of being torn limb from limb represents almost none.
Between 1996 and 2000, the number of abortions in the United States fell from 1.36 million to 1.31 million. (Finer & Henshaw, 2003). The CDC estimates that 58 percent of legal abortions occur within the first eight weeks of gestation, and 88 percent are performed within the first 12 weeks. Only 1.5 percent occur after 20 weeks. (CDC, 2003).

Since the nationwide legalization of abortion in 1973, the proportion of abortions performed after the first trimester has decreased because of increased access to and knowledge about safe, legal abortion services (Gold, 2003).


-almost all abortions take place within the first 12 weeks. as nature pointed out, some would say at 14 weeks a fetus can't feel and its closer to the end of the second trimester for pain to be felt.

and less than 2% happen after week 20.
__________________
I'm so Obamafied

When other girls wanted to be a ballerina, I wanted to be a Vampire.
Reply With Quote
  #64 (permalink)  
Old 05-23-2008, 03:17 PM
Machiavelli Incarnate
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 7,777
Default

I still think that abortions are great for feminists, lesbians, liberals, commies, leftists, and other dickweeds that I don't like.
__________________
GOD BLESS AMERICA
Reply With Quote
  #65 (permalink)  
Old 05-23-2008, 05:35 PM
Lexi's Avatar
Machiavelli Incarnate
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: On the Beach
Posts: 3,064
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by fenianforever1689 View Post
I still think that abortions are great for feminists, lesbians, liberals, commies, leftists, and other dickweeds that I don't like.

__________________
"its potential, its potential, its potential because I said so, there's your proof" --- Palerider
Reply With Quote
  #66 (permalink)  
Old 05-24-2008, 12:10 AM
wolf_22's Avatar
Machiavelli Incarnate
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Chicago :D
Posts: 3,172
Smile

Quote:
Originally Posted by fenianforever1689 View Post
I still think that abortions are great for feminists, lesbians, liberals, commies, leftists, and other dickweeds that I don't like.
another man who stands by his principles
__________________
I'm so Obamafied

When other girls wanted to be a ballerina, I wanted to be a Vampire.
Reply With Quote
  #67 (permalink)  
Old 05-25-2008, 12:27 AM
areyoushittin'me?'s Avatar
Machiavelli Incarnate
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Huh?
Posts: 6,180
Default

If abortions were made illegal the cons would lose a wedge issue...ain't gonna happen.
__________________
"All the problems we face in the United States today can be traced to an unenlightened immigration policy on the part of the American Indian."

Which side will you be on?


OBAMA/PEROT
Reply With Quote
  #68 (permalink)  
Old 05-25-2008, 05:00 PM
Machiavelli Incarnate
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 7,777
Default

Wrong. The battle isn't really over abortion but Roe.

The demoncunts would lose their "issue" as well you stupid cunt.
__________________
GOD BLESS AMERICA
Reply With Quote
  #69 (permalink)  
Old 05-25-2008, 07:43 PM
Political Novice
 
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 2
Default

Quote:
You are the one claiming that the fetus is seperate from it's mother.... If 'it' is so seperate, then why can't a fetus live outside of her body?



This argument simulates a human fetus being the equivalent of a fungus or parasite that requires a host from which to sustain life rather than an actual reproduction. That chosen argument has therefore been ruled ignorant.
Reply With Quote
  #70 (permalink)  
Old 05-25-2008, 10:58 PM
wolf_22's Avatar
Machiavelli Incarnate
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Chicago :D
Posts: 3,172
Smile

Quote:
Originally Posted by Exposing Ignorance View Post
This argument simulates a human fetus being the equivalent of a fungus or parasite that requires a host from which to sustain life rather than an actual reproduction. That chosen argument has therefore been ruled ignorant.
ruled ignorant by whom?
__________________
I'm so Obamafied

When other girls wanted to be a ballerina, I wanted to be a Vampire.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On
Forum Jump


» Navigation

Political Links Page

Blogs by AWE Members

Advertisers support this site - if you're interested in their product, take a look!


$5 monthly donation:

$10 monthly donation:



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:25 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.2.0