Quote:
Originally Posted by Smitty0311
This doesent make the liberals right in politisizing this war for their own gain and being responsible for a devided nation as well as motovated terrorists. The plan of oposiong bush isnt a plan at all. They should have united under this war reguardless of party offiliation because they voted for it. There are other ways of bringing new ideas and plans to light without being responsible for aiding terror. The terrorists want the liberals in office because of their views on iraq. That sends a strong message doesent it? Reguardless of the presedents past actions we still should not be content with failure in iraq. The fact that you bring this up shows your resolve to politisize this war. I like to look foward myself not back. What do we need to do to win this war now, not what if we had done this then. Its easy to critisize the presedents plans for iraq when the liberals have no plan themselvs. They know if they arent invalved inthe desision making process then they take none of the responsibility. I say lead follow or get the hell out of the way! If your not a part of the solution then your part of the problem.
|
I agree that the Democrats voted to give the President the power to conduct this war.
They didn’t give him Carte Blanche.
Many feel this administration has been given the opportunity, and they have failed.
Many feel we have been deceived about the progress being made in Iraq.
Quite frankly, many have lost their trust in the President, and I believe you can relate to a loss of trust. Once someone gives you cause to lose trust in them, one will never, NEVER trust that person again. It’s true in our public life, as well as our private life.
Trust is not something you can turn on and off with a switch.