Thread: Tort Reform
View Single Post
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 12-28-2006, 07:41 AM
freedomlover freedomlover is offline
Machiavelli Incarnate
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Oklahoma
Posts: 4,493
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by rob View Post
freedomlover, I have to agree with you on that to a point. The real problem with this is the insurance lobby. The cost of malpractice insurance is driving many people away from medicine all together. This is going to effect the less populated areas first before the cityies and metro areas are hit with a shortage of trained qualified medical professionals.

I am very happy to hold manufacturers responsible for producing faulty products but I am afraid that unless damage limits are estblished then the only ones benefiting really are the lawyers.
Well, what I think would help with that is limit "pain and suffering" outlay, which the lawyers can draw on their share and leave the medical open for the manufacturer to pay for. The manufacturers would then be responsible for any future medical bills without set limits, the lawyers couldn't touch the medical settlement, and the consumer is protected.
Reply With Quote