Quote:
Originally Posted by cat's meow
We did not invade or OVERTHROW him though. So what does that mean exactly...start to connect the dots, as they say...and does that mean Saddam could have changed with the right amount of force done the right way(?), why is Khadaffi any more or less special than Saddam. Saddam did not bomb the WTC Buildings on 9/11(?)
|
I'm not sure we needed to overthrow Saddam, and I am dead sure that we didn't need to lose 3000 of our own to put him on trial before a bunch of cutthroat asshole Shias. I'm not even sure Saddam needed an attitude adjustment, like Muammar did. Neocons are starting to say that we were better off with Saddam in power than we are now.