Quote:
|
Originally Posted by robster
So how is this getting to the point of my uality huh? Do not question my uality because this is not about uality. I have never questioned your uality, but maybe I should.
|
Really? I thought that "do you enjoy this issue, or are you a concerned citizen" was a thinly veiled implication. If not, than I apologize for any personal attacks. I certainly don't want to take the offensive in that department.
Quote:
|
Homophobia... maybe I fear that our country is getting into to this a little too fast so yes I fear of being gay? Do you? I love the way you point strategically my little flaws in my posts... does it make you a better person knowing at the end of the day that you tryed to comment me on my philosphy of life? Again... you seem to go back to this... is it just me or do you agree with everything I said?
|
Which "little flaws" did I point out? The one where you implied that gays are not equal, or that there are no gay animals, that immorality and prejudice are like chocolate and peanut butter, that gays are not in their right mind set or that you are not interested in statistics? Those aren't little flaws, those are the basis of your argument, sir.
Quote:
|
Anyhow at the end of the day (like i said in other posts at the end of the day I will still know whats right and whats wrong)
|
That's great! Knowing right from wrong is the most fundamental virtue. However, you must understand that not everyone agrees with you on definitions of right and wrong. While you are free to believe whatever it is you believe, it is morally treasonable to reduce another group to a second class citizen.
When will we stop legislating morality?
Quote:
|
NG does not educate me but I think you are educating me on how to loose morals and knowlege on uality? If thats what life is about well than I feel sorry for you.
|
Dude.
I understand that NG doesn't educate you, but maybe something other than right wing radio should. You should probably see differing viewpoints on issues, even if those viewpoints contradict your beliefs, then draw conclusions. That's the beauty of this website, but if you just consistently dismiss evidence that contradicts your beliefs with nothing more than your stubborn prejudice it's not really a debate, it's more like beating up a retard.
I'm not trying to make you lose morals, good god, I'm not telling you to go marry a boy. You should have an open mind and tackle these issues with intelligence not emotion.
As far as knowledge on sexuality, you should have a little of this before you start claiming "facts" of such.
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by HuffDawg
The question on the surface seems to be about man marrying a man or woman marrying a woman, but that is just the surface. Why should be stop there? Why can't a man marry 2 women? or 2 men for that matter? If it their religious belief, why should we discriminate? Will it stop there? What if my religion is to worship and marry sheep? The Democrats want full seperation of Church and state, well my religion says I can marry sheep and they shouldn't interfere.
|
I knew someone had to jump on the slippery slope bandwagon. It was only a matter of time. The old, "I don't want no homo marrying my dog" argument.
First there are laws in place against polygamy and the Mormons used to believe that as part of their religion. But people are meant to adapt.
Your argument of the sheep is completely ridiculous. Gay marriage is a union between two consenting adults to legally proclaim their love and commitment to each other. Ever met a consenting sheep? Um..nevermind, I don't wanna know.
Who are you (the collective you) to deprive them of that? Who are you (the literal you) to even remotely imply similiarities between beastiality and homosexuality?
Once again I ask all you who agree with this current administration on this issue...
How does two gay people getting married affect your life? How does it defile your sanctimonious marriage?