Originally Posted by gcburns

Time and Space?

I'm here to argue. I don't think Einstein himself could win this argument. And I'm not saying he's not right. He could be, but where is the answer to this argument in any of his work, or that of any physicist since? I understand the theories well enough. Yet I keep coming back to a fundamental flaw.

The theory has cracks because of its dependance on the human inability to percieve light until it reaches their eyes. Our ability to sense light as vision is a human perspective of a moving substance. How can you create a theory based so heavily on human perspective?

Read about the theory. One argument it makes is that a single event appears to happen at different times depending on where the subjects is. And therefore everything is relative to the subject.

Well thats the whole problem. Things do appear, don't they, but thats not necessarilly how they exist. The extent of the human senses does not define the laws of the universe. I propose a theory of universal perspective. Because the theory of relativety is based largely on the human perspective, not on that of the universe. Yes, I'm calling you out Einstein.