Quote:
Originally Posted by coyote
A point that I refuted I might add. As far as water is concerned, the problem stems not from an absence of supplies but from the absence of a proper market that would ensure a balance between supply and demand.
Maintaining water resources in open-access commons leads to depletion and degradation. In a commons argument, no one owns water and therefore no one is responsible for it or has an interest in protecting and preserving it.
Freely operating markets are the most effective means for distributing goods, whether they be bread, apartments, shows or water. Water markets discourage users from wasting valuable water, they channel supply to those who value it most, and they help reduce poverty by providing income and employment to the poor.
|
So, why don't farmers in drought areas go to corporations like Coke and Pepsi and buy the water they need from them?
In fact, why don't you buy the water you flush the toilet and shower with from them and their competitors - in fifteen years they grew their water market by a thousand fold.
The thing is, Atlanta is the home of Coke, if I recall, and yet Atlanta is in a drought. It seems they aren't getting enough rain. Did Georgia stop paying Coke for their rain?