Quote:
Originally Posted by Realist1
I answered you with this:
Originally Posted by Realist1
I'll answer you question on extracting the oil. In Long Beach CA., over 25 years ago they'd inject steam into tapped out pockets to glean the barrels of oil out...
Let's carry a known step further. Shale oil hasn't been worth the cost to extract it,,,until now. Again I'll pass on what I'll learned.
The Tri-State area has more oil then the entire Middle East. I'd rather spend my money on our own research and development, than piss it away to the Islamic Assholes right now.
Possibly,,,you might agree? 
You present me with this drivel:
You did not answer my questions and you ignored what I tried to share with you...you are obviously clueless on this topic which is fine but your obvious lack of willingness to learn leads me to conclude that conversing with you on this topic is a monumental waste of time...normally, I don't let that get in the way of presenting information because in explaining it to you someone else may benefit...however...repeating it shouldn't be necessary if they are paying attention so I won't bother...have a good day.[/QUOTE
If you ever find one,,,have a good day.
|
Bullshit...
I've shared with you that there is a big difference between tar sands and shale oil...both in formation type and product type contained in each.
I've explained why the conventional steaming such as they use in Long Beach is irrelevant in recovery in the shale...a process I was involved in over 25 years ago.
I've provided you with a study that shows we are not yet able to commercially produce the shale that we have...it is too deep for strip mining economically and the in situ process is still in the test phases.
And in the past, I and others have explained about oil being a world market commodity...and...that for the most part, the companies that will likely get involved in producing it are International companies anyway.
You choose to ignore all of that and the best you can come up with is "drivel"...
